The real mystery is how he passed a medical for us

i have a name change awaiting if i lose sir and fine you know it.

i dont care if he stays or goes, i just want an answer to our bet.

so you can lose

part of the bet is i get to choose what u get on the back of your top. i'm thinking "laudrup 1"

JKF "Laudrup?"

Cannae say fairer than that

comment by Wieghorst (U12621)
posted 2 minutes ago
Efe can leave on a free Stuttgart interested apparentlyHernanes still on the radar as is McCarthy. Mulgrew to join Blackburn.

Jozo has not failed the medical apparently and talks are ongoing.

Any others???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heard efe is going to Rotherham

What are the terms of the bet?


Let's hear them, to avoid another "Laudrup" scenario.

(Although I have full faith in Ginger to keep his word)

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
i have a name change awaiting if i lose sir and fine you know it.

i dont care if he stays or goes, i just want an answer to our bet.

so you can lose

part of the bet is i get to choose what u get on the back of your top. i'm thinking "laudrup 1"


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oi keep all this to the real transfer thread, Admin you know what to do

Jozo has not failed the medical apparently and talks are ongoing

Various media outlets reporting he has

Well most of them talk pash, the truth will out soon

if i recall correctly mick, ginger stated we paid 4.5 million upfront for simunovic, i dont think we will have paid that, upfront being the key word.

if we have not paid that upfront then ginger has to wear a rangers top to the next old firm game after the victor has been declared..

if i lose i get a name change for a month.

comment by GTB... (U14017)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oi keep all this to the real transfer thread, Admin you know what to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's 2

also, ginger has to sit in the celtic end.

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 8 seconds ago
if i recall correctly mick, ginger stated we paid 4.5 million upfront for simunovic, i dont think we will have paid that, upfront being the key word.

if we have not paid that upfront then ginger has to wear a rangers top to the next old firm game after the victor has been declared..

if i lose i get a name change for a month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems a very fair balanced forfeit

There is no way we paid £4.5 up front.


How will you settle it though? Are there certain papers you will trust?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Laudrup: how did Barton play? (U12366)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTB... (U14017)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oi keep all this to the real transfer thread, Admin you know what to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah for ffs, mine was all inclusive and all

there in lies the dilemma mick, i'm hoping there will be some sort of chat about the fee once he leaves

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 36 seconds ago
if i recall correctly mick, ginger stated we paid 4.5 million upfront for simunovic, i dont think we will have paid that, upfront being the key word.

if we have not paid that upfront then ginger has to wear a rangers top to the next old firm game after the victor has been declared..

if i lose i get a name change for a month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://twitter.com/AgentScotland/status/770626969344106496

that counts tapper.

u lose ginger.

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Laudrup: how did Barton play?(U12366)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edgie (U7142)
posted 41 seconds ago
laudrup
I have no issue with paying players that contribute more getting paid more
I do have issues with players that don't contribute getting a penny.
If they are seriously injured aye pay them, but players that are constantly injured like he has been ...best rid of
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did say it was genius on lawwells part getting the money back on him but it would appear something has shown up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So now we can start believing the Daily Record again?

Cool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
o bu@@er if it was in the record its crap we are stuck with him

Like fwck it does.

And just for the record it was £4m. Everything else as stated.

i'm sure it was 4.5

i went hunting yesterday and found one for 5.5

Not from me you didn't.

It was £4m although I could see Celtic paying out the £4.4m

https://www.facebook.com/all4/photos/a.667990616668961.1073741829.523948101073214/872166569584697/?type=3&theater