Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 20 minutes ago
Just watched the highlights and for what it's worth (fwck all I know) Garner was onside for his goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasn't
Jesus what are you lot like man
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 30 minutes ago
Just watched the highlights and for what it's worth (fwck all I know) Garner was onside for his goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Original lauders 👌 More Than a ♧ (U9757)
posted 6 minutes ago
Jesus what are you lot like man
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂
comment by BB - The Brodge (U13430)
posted 34 minutes ago
Are Barton, Senderos and Kranjcar Warbys signings? Really? Granted he was stuck and desperate to go for Senderos but the other two? At the expense of younger players doesn't seem like War by to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is all this talk of wars?
Banners about wars? What war is it ?
https://youtu.be/Mr4vnX55jmM
😂😂😂😂😂😂
No gingernuts he was def offside according to the second phase rule. If he made no attempt to play the ball and it went straight in from miller then it wouldve been legitimate.
He didn't attempt to play the ball though.
It was floated straight over to Miller and was miles over his head.
As it was our defenders obviously.
And the ref and linesmen had a great game. They got almost every decision right including that one.
Glad he touched it so Miller canny get credited for another goal against us the wee bassa
He was off side ginge.. rules are rules
comment by Kazakami Celtic Tsunami (U21008)
posted 5 minutes ago
No gingernuts he was def offside according to the second phase rule. If he made no attempt to play the ball and it went straight in from miller then it wouldve been legitimate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The goal stood, there was no claim from the players, legitimate goal
Nope.
He wasn't.
He was inside and within the rules. These goals get analysed over and over on tv. Not one suggestion from anyone on there that he was offside.
He wasn't.
End of
That's it.
See?
Can't be ersed arguing any more.
No its called the second phase rule. Im not talking about moving towards the ball when it went to miller but after miller headed it back across. Hold on ill try to find a link
Onside. Wasn't interfering with play.
Amazed you are talking about it though. If i was in your lots boots i wouldn't even remember our one goal.
Exactly.
He is well behind Miller before the ball is headed back over. That's second phase. Look at their positions relative to the 6 yard line.
Guinny already has a link up.
And now I'm not arguing any more. Have a wee look
comment by Kazakami Celtic Tsunami (U21008)
posted 34 seconds ago
No its called the second phase rule. Im not talking about moving towards the ball when it went to miller but after miller headed it back across. Hold on ill try to find a link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take an ad out in a French language newspaper try and get it changed
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Was his only contribution to the game so maybe a little unfair but rules are rules
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
No laudrup dont want to get it chanhed. Just pointing out the mistake.
Btw does anyone think Warburton asked the team to try and get celtic players in trouble with the ref. Happened three or four times and was quite blatant i thought.
Joe garner
Page 2 of 3
posted on 11/9/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/9/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/9/16
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 20 minutes ago
Just watched the highlights and for what it's worth (fwck all I know) Garner was onside for his goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasn't
posted on 11/9/16
Jesus what are you lot like man
posted on 11/9/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/9/16
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 30 minutes ago
Just watched the highlights and for what it's worth (fwck all I know) Garner was onside for his goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 11/9/16
comment by Original lauders 👌 More Than a ♧ (U9757)
posted 6 minutes ago
Jesus what are you lot like man
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂
posted on 11/9/16
comment by BB - The Brodge (U13430)
posted 34 minutes ago
Are Barton, Senderos and Kranjcar Warbys signings? Really? Granted he was stuck and desperate to go for Senderos but the other two? At the expense of younger players doesn't seem like War by to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is all this talk of wars?
Banners about wars? What war is it ?
posted on 11/9/16
SSSSHHHHH
Shhhhhh
posted on 11/9/16
https://youtu.be/Mr4vnX55jmM
😂😂😂😂😂😂
posted on 11/9/16
No gingernuts he was def offside according to the second phase rule. If he made no attempt to play the ball and it went straight in from miller then it wouldve been legitimate.
posted on 11/9/16
He didn't attempt to play the ball though.
It was floated straight over to Miller and was miles over his head.
As it was our defenders obviously.
And the ref and linesmen had a great game. They got almost every decision right including that one.
posted on 11/9/16
Glad he touched it so Miller canny get credited for another goal against us the wee bassa
posted on 11/9/16
He was off side ginge.. rules are rules
posted on 11/9/16
comment by Kazakami Celtic Tsunami (U21008)
posted 5 minutes ago
No gingernuts he was def offside according to the second phase rule. If he made no attempt to play the ball and it went straight in from miller then it wouldve been legitimate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The goal stood, there was no claim from the players, legitimate goal
posted on 11/9/16
Nope.
He wasn't.
He was inside and within the rules. These goals get analysed over and over on tv. Not one suggestion from anyone on there that he was offside.
He wasn't.
End of
That's it.
See?
Can't be ersed arguing any more.
posted on 11/9/16
No its called the second phase rule. Im not talking about moving towards the ball when it went to miller but after miller headed it back across. Hold on ill try to find a link
posted on 11/9/16
Onside. Wasn't interfering with play.
Amazed you are talking about it though. If i was in your lots boots i wouldn't even remember our one goal.
posted on 11/9/16
Exactly.
He is well behind Miller before the ball is headed back over. That's second phase. Look at their positions relative to the 6 yard line.
Guinny already has a link up.
And now I'm not arguing any more. Have a wee look
posted on 11/9/16
comment by Kazakami Celtic Tsunami (U21008)
posted 34 seconds ago
No its called the second phase rule. Im not talking about moving towards the ball when it went to miller but after miller headed it back across. Hold on ill try to find a link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take an ad out in a French language newspaper try and get it changed
posted on 11/9/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/9/16
Was his only contribution to the game so maybe a little unfair but rules are rules
posted on 11/9/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/9/16
No laudrup dont want to get it chanhed. Just pointing out the mistake.
posted on 11/9/16
Btw does anyone think Warburton asked the team to try and get celtic players in trouble with the ref. Happened three or four times and was quite blatant i thought.
Page 2 of 3