The Chelsea cbs were trying to mark the same guy. Cahill had no faith in Luiz at all and it showed.
Contrast with matip who simply stepped in behind klavan and let him go win it. They were in perfect harmony but then it was only hull I suppose.
Chelsea were terrible. They seem to have just lost it and badly need a back to basics bit of training
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 3 minutes ago
The Chelsea cbs were trying to mark the same guy. Cahill had no faith in Luiz at all and it showed.
Contrast with matip who simply stepped in behind klavan and let him go win it. They were in perfect harmony but then it was only hull I suppose.
Chelsea were terrible. They seem to have just lost it and badly need a back to basics bit of training
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most new managers need half a season, it's called transition.
Poor Liquid. Still trying
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Pegguy Arphexad (U1217)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yes and we scored three, so it was a three-goal tanking. But I've no idea why you've brought it up anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JimmyTheRed was on about tankins
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well maybe you should consider a bigger and more recent tanking, i.e. 5-1
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 25 minutes ago
The Chelsea cbs were trying to mark the same guy. Cahill had no faith in Luiz at all and it showed.
Contrast with matip who simply stepped in behind klavan and let him go win it. They were in perfect harmony but then it was only hull I suppose.
Chelsea were terrible. They seem to have just lost it and badly need a back to basics bit of training
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We made them look terrible that's why
"That was nearly 10 years ago
And you actually only beat us by three "
You have no qualms calling your 4-3 win against us a "tanking".
At least keep it consistent.
I've never called it a tanking. We had a 20 minute spell where we absolutely destroyed you but overall it wasn't a tanking.
I think the tanking thing was just RimmyTheRed trying to get bites, wouldn't read too much into it.
The only real tanking anyone has received so far out of the three teams was Chelsea on Saturday IMO.
Solid beating is how I would describe it.
It was quite an easy win against a poor Chelsea side.
Conte needs to turn things around quickly or Roman will do what normally does.
Got it in one, The Bag, well done son!
Rimmy?
Take more water with it mate.
JimmyTheRed
Sign in if you want to comment
Those poor boys, them Blues
Page 3 of 3
posted on 25/9/16
The Chelsea cbs were trying to mark the same guy. Cahill had no faith in Luiz at all and it showed.
Contrast with matip who simply stepped in behind klavan and let him go win it. They were in perfect harmony but then it was only hull I suppose.
Chelsea were terrible. They seem to have just lost it and badly need a back to basics bit of training
posted on 25/9/16
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 3 minutes ago
The Chelsea cbs were trying to mark the same guy. Cahill had no faith in Luiz at all and it showed.
Contrast with matip who simply stepped in behind klavan and let him go win it. They were in perfect harmony but then it was only hull I suppose.
Chelsea were terrible. They seem to have just lost it and badly need a back to basics bit of training
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most new managers need half a season, it's called transition.
posted on 25/9/16
Poor Liquid. Still trying
posted on 25/9/16
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Pegguy Arphexad (U1217)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yes and we scored three, so it was a three-goal tanking. But I've no idea why you've brought it up anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JimmyTheRed was on about tankins
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well maybe you should consider a bigger and more recent tanking, i.e. 5-1
posted on 25/9/16
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 25 minutes ago
The Chelsea cbs were trying to mark the same guy. Cahill had no faith in Luiz at all and it showed.
Contrast with matip who simply stepped in behind klavan and let him go win it. They were in perfect harmony but then it was only hull I suppose.
Chelsea were terrible. They seem to have just lost it and badly need a back to basics bit of training
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We made them look terrible that's why
posted on 25/9/16
"That was nearly 10 years ago
And you actually only beat us by three "
You have no qualms calling your 4-3 win against us a "tanking".
At least keep it consistent.
posted on 25/9/16
I've never called it a tanking. We had a 20 minute spell where we absolutely destroyed you but overall it wasn't a tanking.
posted on 26/9/16
I think the tanking thing was just RimmyTheRed trying to get bites, wouldn't read too much into it.
The only real tanking anyone has received so far out of the three teams was Chelsea on Saturday IMO.
posted on 26/9/16
Solid beating is how I would describe it.
It was quite an easy win against a poor Chelsea side.
Conte needs to turn things around quickly or Roman will do what normally does.
posted on 26/9/16
Got it in one, The Bag, well done son!
Rimmy?
Take more water with it mate.
JimmyTheRed
Page 3 of 3