Obviously, Clinton is a friend of Wall Street

.................

So is Trump.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 seconds ago
Instantly reminded me of the vid of Trump stalking Clinton in the second debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Media spin,

..........................

It is on tape you moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On tape her going over his side, in his space you fool.

Politicians love gullible easy to manipulate people like you.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 15 seconds ago
Obviously, Clinton is a friend of Wall Street

.................

So is Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, he is not, the bankers have made him declare bankruptcy a few times.

Plus the bankers are waiting on sweet deals Hillary has promised them involving robbing the American people.

On tape her going over his side, in his space you fool.

.............

No, you idiot, it is on tape of Trump actually stalking her. people were taking the pee out of the sexual predator the next day.

You must have missed it on purpose.

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 15 seconds ago
Obviously, Clinton is a friend of Wall Street

.................

So is Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, he is not, the bankers have made him declare bankruptcy a few times.

...................

You do know that that has helped him not pay his debts, yes? Six time in fact.

Please tell me you know this and are not this stupid for real, and it is all an act.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
On tape her going over his side, in his space you fool.

.............

No, you idiot, it is on tape of Trump actually stalking her. people were taking the pee out of the sexual predator the next day.

You must have missed it on purpose.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she is not on his side of the stage?

Damn you are crazy

Whats VC going to do when Trump wins?

Wall street definitely does not want trump to win

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 15 seconds ago
Obviously, Clinton is a friend of Wall Street

.................

So is Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, he is not, the bankers have made him declare bankruptcy a few times.

...................

You do know that that has helped him not pay his debts, yes? Six time in fact.

Please tell me you know this and are not this stupid for real, and it is all an act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankers done him over with the loans. They are Hillary's friends not his.

comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 5 minutes ago
Whats VC going to do when Trump wins?

.................

Exactly the same as I will do if Clinton wins. Nothing different what so ever.

I will be better off if Trump wins because the US economy will plummet.

comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 4 minutes ago
Wall street definitely does not want trump to win
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. Hillary will quite literally give them billions, well she gave them trillions last time out.

Still shocking how they got away with it, and it because of people like Clinton.

Wall street definitely does not want trump to win

............

Of course it doesn't as it sees the US economy going south. Same as why the bankers didn't want Brexit.

Self interest.

Shame that idiots still think the economy of the wealthy matters more than the poverty of the people.

Hillary will quite literally give them billions

.............

How will she give them billions?

.......................

well she gave them trillions last time out.

.........................

I can see why you like Trump. You make things up and stick with it.

Shame that idiots still think the economy of the wealthy matters more than the poverty of the people.

................

You do know that Clinton plans to raise taxes on the wealthy and lower them for the middle class, yes? Or are you so misinformed?

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 55 seconds ago
Shame that idiots still think the economy of the wealthy matters more than the poverty of the people.

................

You do know that Clinton plans to raise taxes on the wealthy and lower them for the middle class, yes? Or are you so misinformed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know Clinton has said she has a public stance on things, and a private one that she really believes in.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
Hillary will quite literally give them billions

.............

How will she give them billions?

.......................

well she gave them trillions last time out.

.........................

I can see why you like Trump. You make things up and stick with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you been hiding under a rock?

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 2 hours, 23 minutes ago
Whilst both candidates are less than trustworthy, HC has been in politics her entire adult life. She at least, has the basic qualifications. In fact she is more than qualified.

Trump can offer nothing. Which is why he has focused on anything but policy. His economic policy for example has been universally ridiculed by economists. So much so, he's had to completely rework it on a number of occasions.

While neither are a great choice, at least HC has the practical intelligence to hold office.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/11/01/prominent-economists-including-eight-nobel-laureates-do-not-vote-for-donald-trump/


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Her record has shown what a despicable callous human being she is and how she cares little about the people only her donors and is a threat to world peace.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet still unconditionally more qualified to be POTUS than DT.

Not because I think she’s a great politician, or I’m keen on her. Nor because I think she is trustworthy.

Because she represents considerably less risk than DT.

Have you been hiding under a rock?

.............

No.

Explain to me how 'she gave them trillions last time out'.

Considering there has never been a last time out for her, this should be very good.

D4thincarnation

“The bankers” had nothing to do with DT’s bankruptcy.

DT used bankruptcy as (yet another) tax avoidance scheme. Wall St had no involvement whatsoever. It was an arrangement of his own doing.

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 2 hours, 23 minutes ago
Whilst both candidates are less than trustworthy, HC has been in politics her entire adult life. She at least, has the basic qualifications. In fact she is more than qualified.

Trump can offer nothing. Which is why he has focused on anything but policy. His economic policy for example has been universally ridiculed by economists. So much so, he's had to completely rework it on a number of occasions.

While neither are a great choice, at least HC has the practical intelligence to hold office.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/11/01/prominent-economists-including-eight-nobel-laureates-do-not-vote-for-donald-trump/


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Her record has shown what a despicable callous human being she is and how she cares little about the people only her donors and is a threat to world peace.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet still unconditionally more qualified to be POTUS than DT.

Not because I think she’s a great politician, or I’m keen on her. Nor because I think she is trustworthy.

Because she represents considerably less risk than DT.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is the one sabre rattling angling for a war with Russia, not Trump

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 5 minutes ago
Have you been hiding under a rock?

.............

No.

Explain to me how 'she gave them trillions last time out'.

Considering there has never been a last time out for her, this should be very good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She voted to give the bankers trillions

You know Clinton has said she has a public stance on things, and a private one that she really believes in.

..............

No, I don't know what she privately thinks on taxes. Neither do you. But I bet you quote wikileaks to me as if that backs anything up.

What we do know for certain is that Clinton has declared her tax return for the year as public record. Trump has not.

Why do you think he has not?

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 55 seconds ago
Shame that idiots still think the economy of the wealthy matters more than the poverty of the people.

................

You do know that Clinton plans to raise taxes on the wealthy and lower them for the middle class, yes? Or are you so misinformed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know Clinton has said she has a public stance on things, and a private one that she really believes in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://taxfoundation.org/article/details-and-analysis-hillary-clinton-s-tax-proposals

She is the one sabre rattling angling for a war with Russia

................

No she isn't.