sanchez and morata if costa and hazard leave
Id like us to sign Sanchez for a multitude of reasons.
Sanchez plz
Hazard Sanchez Pedro would be insane,
Dont rate Morata and Lukaku is meh big fish in a small pond
It's highly doubtful Hazard will leave this summer. Costa on the other hand probably will, so that leaves us to fill his place.
Sanches is not really is striker, but can play there if needed, so can Pedro !!! Whereas, the other two are out and strikers.
Sanches to Chelsea would be hilarious if it happens though
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id like us to sign Sanchez for a multitude of reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The meltdown on here would be hilarious
The G00ns on twitter already started the meltdown yesterday
I like Sanchez the player. And I know we need players for the ‘here and now’ but am I right in thinking he’s 28?
I wouldn’t be distraught if he departed these shores.
"It happened before when we had to sell our best players. But, that's not the case anymore. He has 1.5 years left in his contract. I don't think it's an immediate concern for Arsenal" Wenger said in his press conference ahead of Man City game.
Well good luck with that Wenger
Fecking hell its SancheZ not SancheS. How do people constantly mis spell something when it's written right in front of them multiple times?
As for who we should sign Sanchez please Roman
All I know is, if Conte wants a player and Emanalo another, our manager better win the argument.
Last summer to secure the signing of Kante we went over and above his release clause. I think we should do the same with Sanchez this summer, whatever any club from continental Europe offer we should stick another £10-20m on top because he really is that good and worth it.
He would take us up a notch to amongst the European elite. Can you imagine counter attacking in the CL with Hazard and Sanchez on the wings fecking immense
Don’t get me wrong, but I wonder how hard Pool tried, when negotiating the sale of Suarez, to get Sanchez as part of the negotiations? I’m guessing the “London” factor might have played a part.
I also remember a lot our fans wanted Sanchez when he was at Udinese, that in hindsight would have been an absolute steal.
--------------------------
WW
I hope the Manager/Head Coach of Chelsea Football Club always has the main say, i've been ranting about this for some time, because i think he's the person who stands to lose his job based on the players at his disposal.
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 4 minutes ago
Last summer to secure the signing of Kante we went over and above his release clause. I think we should do the same with Sanchez this summer, whatever any club from continental Europe offer we should stick another £10-20m on top because he really is that good and worth it.
He would take us up a notch to amongst the European elite. Can you imagine counter attacking in the CL with Hazard and Sanchez on the wings fecking immense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers
I think that ‘release clause’ was related to Champions League based clubs only? I could be wrong but I am sure I heard that statement somewhere a few weeks back. Could even have been on Sunday Supplement.
We can't afford to fling Sanchez on to Conte. What a tragedy that would be, giving our manager a world class player to fit into his squad
Remember that last summer Conte didn't exactly want Luiz yet he's turned him into an exceptional CB.
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 4 minutes ago
Last summer to secure the signing of Kante we went over and above his release clause. I think we should do the same with Sanchez this summer, whatever any club from continental Europe offer we should stick another £10-20m on top because he really is that good and worth it.
He would take us up a notch to amongst the European elite. Can you imagine counter attacking in the CL with Hazard and Sanchez on the wings fecking immense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers
I think that ‘release clause’ was related to Champions League based clubs only? I could be wrong but I am sure I heard that statement somewhere a few weeks back. Could even have been on Sunday Supplement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It could well have been and I think you are right. But just because we couldn't officially pay the release clause doesn't mean we couldn't have offered the exact amount and let Kante decide.
Offering £10m more basically secured us his signature.
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Fecking hell its SancheZ not SancheS. How do people constantly mis spell something when it's written right in front of them multiple times?
As for who we should sign Sanchez please Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good spot. I always spell his name wrong for some reason
Sanchez will prove difficult to sign even though he wants to come to us. Will see what happens. Hopefully we can pull this one off
I'd be happy with Lukaku but would prefer Morata. The idea of Sanchez and Hazard in the same side is so good that I don't wanna put too much hope into it actually happening.
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
We can't afford to fling Sanchez on to Conte. What a tragedy that would be, giving our manager a world class player to fit into his squad
Remember that last summer Conte didn't exactly want Luiz yet he's turned him into an exceptional CB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers agree with your example, but I think that one can cut both ways…………….
I’m sure a few of the players bought the Summer before last, were not ones Jose would have chosen. I cannot in a million years believe Hector was. Dijil-Nobody? No chance. Baba? I have my doubts.
So I think I would still prefer the man who ultimately lives and dies by the recruitment policy to be the main influence in their recruitment.
I’m not saying that was all that got Jose the George W’ by the way.
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
We can't afford to fling Sanchez on to Conte. What a tragedy that would be, giving our manager a world class player to fit into his squad
Remember that last summer Conte didn't exactly want Luiz yet he's turned him into an exceptional CB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers agree with your example, but I think that one can cut both ways…………….
I’m sure a few of the players bought the Summer before last, were not ones Jose would have chosen. I cannot in a million years believe Hector was. Dijil-Nobody? No chance. Baba? I have my doubts.
So I think I would still prefer the man who ultimately lives and dies by the recruitment policy to be the main influence in their recruitment.
I’m not saying that was all that got Jose the George W’ by the way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The examples you are given above were mainly Emenalo - Djililjihohhnotgoodenoughforastonvilla was an Emenalo recommendation as was the worst LB I have ever seen in Rahman
If reports are true then the player Emenalo wants us to sign is Lukaku, but then he never wanted us to sell him in the first place.
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 27 minutes ago
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if the club agree a deal with Arsenal and Sanchez wants to come, is Conte really going to turn it down?
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 27 minutes ago
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if the club agree a deal with Arsenal and Sanchez wants to come, is Conte really going to turn it down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd rather have the players Conte wants
Any manager who doesn't want Sanchez is insane
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 27 minutes ago
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if the club agree a deal with Arsenal and Sanchez wants to come, is Conte really going to turn it down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If reports are to believed Conte has Sanchez in his wishlist. I would imagine Conte sits down and discuss with Emenalo and Granovskaia the targets that have been identified and recommended by our scouts who mainly report to Emenalo, once they decide together who they want, then Granovskaia starts negotiations with the other clubs.
In my opinion the Lukaku ship has sailed. We had our chance to nurture him, but chose to sign a more proven striker.
IF Costa is going to be sold this summer, then I would like a world class upgrade to come in. Lukaku coming in if Costa is sold, would be a disappointment. He is similar to Costa in that he is raw but a decent goal scorer, but with the very same flaws to his game. We should be looking for a proven upgrade, so we can actually compete on multiple fronts next year.
So for me should go for Sanchez or at least look to keep Costa. Lukaku and Morata I'm not sure will be able to fill Costa's shoes. But Sanchez could actually make our attack one of the best in Europe.
Sign in if you want to comment
Morata, Lukaku and Sanchez
Page 1 of 2
posted on 30/3/17
sanchez and morata if costa and hazard leave
posted on 30/3/17
Id like us to sign Sanchez for a multitude of reasons.
posted on 30/3/17
Sanchez plz
Hazard Sanchez Pedro would be insane,
Dont rate Morata and Lukaku is meh big fish in a small pond
posted on 30/3/17
It's highly doubtful Hazard will leave this summer. Costa on the other hand probably will, so that leaves us to fill his place.
Sanches is not really is striker, but can play there if needed, so can Pedro !!! Whereas, the other two are out and strikers.
Sanches to Chelsea would be hilarious if it happens though
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id like us to sign Sanchez for a multitude of reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The meltdown on here would be hilarious
posted on 30/3/17
The G00ns on twitter already started the meltdown yesterday
posted on 30/3/17
I like Sanchez the player. And I know we need players for the ‘here and now’ but am I right in thinking he’s 28?
I wouldn’t be distraught if he departed these shores.
posted on 30/3/17
"It happened before when we had to sell our best players. But, that's not the case anymore. He has 1.5 years left in his contract. I don't think it's an immediate concern for Arsenal" Wenger said in his press conference ahead of Man City game.
Well good luck with that Wenger
posted on 30/3/17
Fecking hell its SancheZ not SancheS. How do people constantly mis spell something when it's written right in front of them multiple times?
As for who we should sign Sanchez please Roman
posted on 30/3/17
All I know is, if Conte wants a player and Emanalo another, our manager better win the argument.
posted on 30/3/17
Last summer to secure the signing of Kante we went over and above his release clause. I think we should do the same with Sanchez this summer, whatever any club from continental Europe offer we should stick another £10-20m on top because he really is that good and worth it.
He would take us up a notch to amongst the European elite. Can you imagine counter attacking in the CL with Hazard and Sanchez on the wings fecking immense
posted on 30/3/17
Don’t get me wrong, but I wonder how hard Pool tried, when negotiating the sale of Suarez, to get Sanchez as part of the negotiations? I’m guessing the “London” factor might have played a part.
I also remember a lot our fans wanted Sanchez when he was at Udinese, that in hindsight would have been an absolute steal.
--------------------------
WW
I hope the Manager/Head Coach of Chelsea Football Club always has the main say, i've been ranting about this for some time, because i think he's the person who stands to lose his job based on the players at his disposal.
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 4 minutes ago
Last summer to secure the signing of Kante we went over and above his release clause. I think we should do the same with Sanchez this summer, whatever any club from continental Europe offer we should stick another £10-20m on top because he really is that good and worth it.
He would take us up a notch to amongst the European elite. Can you imagine counter attacking in the CL with Hazard and Sanchez on the wings fecking immense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers
I think that ‘release clause’ was related to Champions League based clubs only? I could be wrong but I am sure I heard that statement somewhere a few weeks back. Could even have been on Sunday Supplement.
posted on 30/3/17
We can't afford to fling Sanchez on to Conte. What a tragedy that would be, giving our manager a world class player to fit into his squad
Remember that last summer Conte didn't exactly want Luiz yet he's turned him into an exceptional CB.
posted on 30/3/17
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 4 minutes ago
Last summer to secure the signing of Kante we went over and above his release clause. I think we should do the same with Sanchez this summer, whatever any club from continental Europe offer we should stick another £10-20m on top because he really is that good and worth it.
He would take us up a notch to amongst the European elite. Can you imagine counter attacking in the CL with Hazard and Sanchez on the wings fecking immense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers
I think that ‘release clause’ was related to Champions League based clubs only? I could be wrong but I am sure I heard that statement somewhere a few weeks back. Could even have been on Sunday Supplement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It could well have been and I think you are right. But just because we couldn't officially pay the release clause doesn't mean we couldn't have offered the exact amount and let Kante decide.
Offering £10m more basically secured us his signature.
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Fecking hell its SancheZ not SancheS. How do people constantly mis spell something when it's written right in front of them multiple times?
As for who we should sign Sanchez please Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good spot. I always spell his name wrong for some reason
Sanchez will prove difficult to sign even though he wants to come to us. Will see what happens. Hopefully we can pull this one off
posted on 30/3/17
I'd be happy with Lukaku but would prefer Morata. The idea of Sanchez and Hazard in the same side is so good that I don't wanna put too much hope into it actually happening.
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
We can't afford to fling Sanchez on to Conte. What a tragedy that would be, giving our manager a world class player to fit into his squad
Remember that last summer Conte didn't exactly want Luiz yet he's turned him into an exceptional CB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers agree with your example, but I think that one can cut both ways…………….
I’m sure a few of the players bought the Summer before last, were not ones Jose would have chosen. I cannot in a million years believe Hector was. Dijil-Nobody? No chance. Baba? I have my doubts.
So I think I would still prefer the man who ultimately lives and dies by the recruitment policy to be the main influence in their recruitment.
I’m not saying that was all that got Jose the George W’ by the way.
posted on 30/3/17
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
posted on 30/3/17
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
We can't afford to fling Sanchez on to Conte. What a tragedy that would be, giving our manager a world class player to fit into his squad
Remember that last summer Conte didn't exactly want Luiz yet he's turned him into an exceptional CB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obers agree with your example, but I think that one can cut both ways…………….
I’m sure a few of the players bought the Summer before last, were not ones Jose would have chosen. I cannot in a million years believe Hector was. Dijil-Nobody? No chance. Baba? I have my doubts.
So I think I would still prefer the man who ultimately lives and dies by the recruitment policy to be the main influence in their recruitment.
I’m not saying that was all that got Jose the George W’ by the way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The examples you are given above were mainly Emenalo - Djililjihohhnotgoodenoughforastonvilla was an Emenalo recommendation as was the worst LB I have ever seen in Rahman
If reports are true then the player Emenalo wants us to sign is Lukaku, but then he never wanted us to sell him in the first place.
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 27 minutes ago
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if the club agree a deal with Arsenal and Sanchez wants to come, is Conte really going to turn it down?
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 27 minutes ago
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if the club agree a deal with Arsenal and Sanchez wants to come, is Conte really going to turn it down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd rather have the players Conte wants
posted on 30/3/17
Any manager who doesn't want Sanchez is insane
posted on 30/3/17
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 27 minutes ago
Common sense states that the manager should have the final say on transfers. He is the one that pays the price if they go wrong.
Granovskaia and Emenalo currently oversees transfers and will still be heavily involved. But, Conte has been given assurances that he will have ultimate say on transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if the club agree a deal with Arsenal and Sanchez wants to come, is Conte really going to turn it down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If reports are to believed Conte has Sanchez in his wishlist. I would imagine Conte sits down and discuss with Emenalo and Granovskaia the targets that have been identified and recommended by our scouts who mainly report to Emenalo, once they decide together who they want, then Granovskaia starts negotiations with the other clubs.
posted on 30/3/17
In my opinion the Lukaku ship has sailed. We had our chance to nurture him, but chose to sign a more proven striker.
IF Costa is going to be sold this summer, then I would like a world class upgrade to come in. Lukaku coming in if Costa is sold, would be a disappointment. He is similar to Costa in that he is raw but a decent goal scorer, but with the very same flaws to his game. We should be looking for a proven upgrade, so we can actually compete on multiple fronts next year.
So for me should go for Sanchez or at least look to keep Costa. Lukaku and Morata I'm not sure will be able to fill Costa's shoes. But Sanchez could actually make our attack one of the best in Europe.
Page 1 of 2