comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 1 minute ago
Because it clearly is pig boy. Ranieri basically said it was last night.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he facking didn't you stupid cant! That's just your interpretation. He said he had a good relationship with him and he doesn't have that power, it would have to be a director or an owner. That's what he actually said so shut the fack up!
So why did Pig boy come out and say that shiiit about how his conscience was clear?
Come on bro, everyone knows what Ranieri was saying.
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 12 seconds ago
So why did Pig boy come out and say that shiiit about how his conscience was clear?
Come on bro, everyone knows what Ranieri was saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you for real? If his conscience wasn't clear he wouldn't say it you utter moron! The fact his conscience is clear suggests he had nothing to do with it.
And yes in one week, all it needed was to change our tactics to suit the players. CR should have done it, it should never have got to that point but he was too stubborn to change it. CS recognises what the players are beat at and playing that way they're confident in their ability.
Are you this furrrking stupid? He said it because he knew that everyone now knows its him because of what Ranieri said. If Ranieri hadn't basically said it was him he wouldn't have needed to say anything.
Going two goals up early changed everything, it gave us confidence and once we'd beaten them of course we fancied ourselves to beat Hull. Beat them and you fancy beating West Ham away because they're in poor form and poor at home and you beat Sevilla in between too. Confidence grows and one win can change everything.
How do you think we managed to survive a couple of seasons ago? It wouldn't have anything to do with us changing our style of play to something that suits the players would it? Could we possibly have won just one game and then go on to win seven out of nine?
We already did what you're suggesting isn't possible. You are so dumb!
The obvious explanation is that the players started trying again after Ranieri was fired. You're just ignoring it.
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 8 seconds ago
Are you this furrrking stupid? He said it because he knew that everyone now knows its him because of what Ranieri said. If Ranieri hadn't basically said it was him he wouldn't have needed to say anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seriously need to keep up with play. CR was interviewed in Italy where he divulged more. He said he had a good relationship and they didn't fall out so. He then said that only directors or owners could have pushed him out.
Go and find the interview and stop wasting my time!
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 12 seconds ago
The obvious explanation is that the players started trying again after Ranieri was fired. You're just ignoring it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it's not at all. That's not what happened and you won't find a single person on here who will agree with that, not even Nev!
I think I know what you're doing here. Your players did go behind Maureen's back and they did get him sacked. You don't like the fact your team are rats but you have to accept it but aren't willing to accept you're the only team of rats.
Well sorry to disappoint you but you're the one that supports a team full of rats, not me.
http://www.101greatgoals.com/news/claudio-ranieri-backtracks-over-craig-shakespeare-allusion-on-monday-night-football/
He doesn't think it's CS, it's just you who does!
You're so naive. What he said yesterday clearly showed it was piggy. If he says anything else its because he realises that piggy is the manager of Lester and he doesn't want to cause the team any trouble.
Why do you think the Chelsea players are rats and the Lester players aren't when both situations were basically the same. In fact Chelsea are less likely to be rats since our form didn't improve as much as Lester's did.
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 21 seconds ago
Why do you think the Chelsea players are rats and the Lester players aren't when both situations were basically the same. In fact Chelsea are less likely to be rats since our form didn't improve as much as Lester's did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your players just stopped playing, they fell out with him over Eva and got him sacked.
Our players didn't fall out with him like yours did, we just changed our style and started winning again.
CR is Italian and English isn't his first language so you have to take everything he says and consider what he means. He said "someone behind him" now that could be anyone but you insist it's CS because you don't like him. Someone "behind" him would also be a director.
It's known that he did have a problem with Rudkin and he blamed him for lack of crucial signings in the summer. CR wanted Keane but we didn't bid enough and CR blamed him. Now you have someone who did actually fall out with him.
Also why would CR come out and essentially clear CS's name if he thought it was him? He obviously wouldn't, he'd keep his mouth shut because he didn't actually say anything to name CS.
He came out and said it because he has a good relationship with CS and doesn't want people to think it was him.
But unfortunately there are still morons like you around.
He'd 'clear' his name because he wouldn't want what he said to put pressure on Lester and pig boy.
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only in your little bubble world. Nobody else sees it like that. Have you not read what everyone else is saying on this board? It's only idiots like you who aren't interested in the truth that still think this way.
You're a moron and I'm done with you!
CoE - stop arguing with children, it really doesn't become you.
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 7 hours, 55 minutes ago
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CoE is spot on so I'm agreeing with him. You're the one who's clueless about this topic, clearly in complete WUM mode and unfortunately CoE is taking the bait.
Now you two have finished and BS can't comment on this as he has filtered me thank God.
Interesting comment from Alan Brazil he said he heard from a player (unnamed of course)That the players had stop listening to CR and did not think he knew what he was doing.
That would lead you to believe that they would turn to someone the did believe.
So despite your protestations in our case as with Chelsea the players got the manager sacked and in our case because they did not want to do what he wanted them to do. Now the assistant manager could of said don't be silly boys lets work this through with CR or not who knows but it explains a lot.
I have an idea know whos taken it to the board but it not anyone who has been mentioned.
Alan Brazil who listens to this piiissed up idiot?
Well I heard that CR did the team talk before the Man City game and, just before kick off, the players all decided to ignore what they had been told and play their own game. The result? 4-2 and us playing exciting, attacking goal scoring football.
Give me a choice of that or the players acting on CR's instructions and losing that game 3 or 4 nil, I'll take the players deciding their own playing style.
If that was the case why did they loose so many games or did they pick which matches to listen to cr and which ones to ignore him
Sign in if you want to comment
So it wasn't the players then
Page 4 of 5
posted on 11/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 1 minute ago
Because it clearly is pig boy. Ranieri basically said it was last night.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he facking didn't you stupid cant! That's just your interpretation. He said he had a good relationship with him and he doesn't have that power, it would have to be a director or an owner. That's what he actually said so shut the fack up!
posted on 11/4/17
So why did Pig boy come out and say that shiiit about how his conscience was clear?
Come on bro, everyone knows what Ranieri was saying.
posted on 11/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 12 seconds ago
So why did Pig boy come out and say that shiiit about how his conscience was clear?
Come on bro, everyone knows what Ranieri was saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you for real? If his conscience wasn't clear he wouldn't say it you utter moron! The fact his conscience is clear suggests he had nothing to do with it.
And yes in one week, all it needed was to change our tactics to suit the players. CR should have done it, it should never have got to that point but he was too stubborn to change it. CS recognises what the players are beat at and playing that way they're confident in their ability.
posted on 11/4/17
Are you this furrrking stupid? He said it because he knew that everyone now knows its him because of what Ranieri said. If Ranieri hadn't basically said it was him he wouldn't have needed to say anything.
posted on 11/4/17
Going two goals up early changed everything, it gave us confidence and once we'd beaten them of course we fancied ourselves to beat Hull. Beat them and you fancy beating West Ham away because they're in poor form and poor at home and you beat Sevilla in between too. Confidence grows and one win can change everything.
How do you think we managed to survive a couple of seasons ago? It wouldn't have anything to do with us changing our style of play to something that suits the players would it? Could we possibly have won just one game and then go on to win seven out of nine?
We already did what you're suggesting isn't possible. You are so dumb!
posted on 11/4/17
The obvious explanation is that the players started trying again after Ranieri was fired. You're just ignoring it.
posted on 11/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 8 seconds ago
Are you this furrrking stupid? He said it because he knew that everyone now knows its him because of what Ranieri said. If Ranieri hadn't basically said it was him he wouldn't have needed to say anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seriously need to keep up with play. CR was interviewed in Italy where he divulged more. He said he had a good relationship and they didn't fall out so. He then said that only directors or owners could have pushed him out.
Go and find the interview and stop wasting my time!
posted on 11/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 12 seconds ago
The obvious explanation is that the players started trying again after Ranieri was fired. You're just ignoring it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it's not at all. That's not what happened and you won't find a single person on here who will agree with that, not even Nev!
posted on 11/4/17
I think I know what you're doing here. Your players did go behind Maureen's back and they did get him sacked. You don't like the fact your team are rats but you have to accept it but aren't willing to accept you're the only team of rats.
Well sorry to disappoint you but you're the one that supports a team full of rats, not me.
posted on 11/4/17
http://www.101greatgoals.com/news/claudio-ranieri-backtracks-over-craig-shakespeare-allusion-on-monday-night-football/
He doesn't think it's CS, it's just you who does!
posted on 11/4/17
You're so naive. What he said yesterday clearly showed it was piggy. If he says anything else its because he realises that piggy is the manager of Lester and he doesn't want to cause the team any trouble.
posted on 11/4/17
Why do you think the Chelsea players are rats and the Lester players aren't when both situations were basically the same. In fact Chelsea are less likely to be rats since our form didn't improve as much as Lester's did.
posted on 11/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 21 seconds ago
Why do you think the Chelsea players are rats and the Lester players aren't when both situations were basically the same. In fact Chelsea are less likely to be rats since our form didn't improve as much as Lester's did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your players just stopped playing, they fell out with him over Eva and got him sacked.
Our players didn't fall out with him like yours did, we just changed our style and started winning again.
CR is Italian and English isn't his first language so you have to take everything he says and consider what he means. He said "someone behind him" now that could be anyone but you insist it's CS because you don't like him. Someone "behind" him would also be a director.
It's known that he did have a problem with Rudkin and he blamed him for lack of crucial signings in the summer. CR wanted Keane but we didn't bid enough and CR blamed him. Now you have someone who did actually fall out with him.
posted on 11/4/17
Also why would CR come out and essentially clear CS's name if he thought it was him? He obviously wouldn't, he'd keep his mouth shut because he didn't actually say anything to name CS.
He came out and said it because he has a good relationship with CS and doesn't want people to think it was him.
posted on 11/4/17
But unfortunately there are still morons like you around.
posted on 11/4/17
He'd 'clear' his name because he wouldn't want what he said to put pressure on Lester and pig boy.
posted on 11/4/17
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
posted on 12/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only in your little bubble world. Nobody else sees it like that. Have you not read what everyone else is saying on this board? It's only idiots like you who aren't interested in the truth that still think this way.
You're a moron and I'm done with you!
posted on 12/4/17
CoE - stop arguing with children, it really doesn't become you.
posted on 12/4/17
comment by Cesc + Costa - The Spanish Duo (U21341)
posted 7 hours, 55 minutes ago
And our players did give up on Mourinho. Some did. Just like most or all of your players gave up on Ranieri. It's so clear for everyone to see apart from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CoE is spot on so I'm agreeing with him. You're the one who's clueless about this topic, clearly in complete WUM mode and unfortunately CoE is taking the bait.
posted on 12/4/17
Now you two have finished and BS can't comment on this as he has filtered me thank God.
Interesting comment from Alan Brazil he said he heard from a player (unnamed of course)That the players had stop listening to CR and did not think he knew what he was doing.
That would lead you to believe that they would turn to someone the did believe.
So despite your protestations in our case as with Chelsea the players got the manager sacked and in our case because they did not want to do what he wanted them to do. Now the assistant manager could of said don't be silly boys lets work this through with CR or not who knows but it explains a lot.
I have an idea know whos taken it to the board but it not anyone who has been mentioned.
posted on 12/4/17
Nev
posted on 12/4/17
Alan Brazil who listens to this piiissed up idiot?
posted on 12/4/17
Well I heard that CR did the team talk before the Man City game and, just before kick off, the players all decided to ignore what they had been told and play their own game. The result? 4-2 and us playing exciting, attacking goal scoring football.
Give me a choice of that or the players acting on CR's instructions and losing that game 3 or 4 nil, I'll take the players deciding their own playing style.
posted on 12/4/17
If that was the case why did they loose so many games or did they pick which matches to listen to cr and which ones to ignore him
Page 4 of 5