Not at all!
Firstly you should do some research into what you're actually trying to talk about so someone doesn't make you look like a grade a be11end.
Me - say Robertson is average and deny that he's the joint best LB in the league. Provide evidence of defensive weakness with Walker's dominance of him in game vs Hull (Eriksen goal)
Counter - but the newspaper said he was good!
Rinsed
It's pretty easy to ridicule someone who can't even remember the score of the game they claimed a player absolutely dominated another player.
The fact the journalist thought the opposite of what you were claiming was just the icing on the cake. It doesn't have to mean the Journo was more right than you are. I'm not about to watch the 90 mins myself to find out and don't really care as it's one game and doesn't prove anything anyway even if Walker destroyed him like no full back has ever been destroyed.
It's still worth ridiculing.
Far more worrying than the shiiite above, I've just learned that Oxlade-Chamberlain's agent is the same as Raheem's - Aidy Ward.
Not even with your fekin barge pole!
JimmyTheRed
Meh. I'll have the last laugh when you sign Robertson and he becomes a player you want to sell by summer 2019
I bet you are the type to actually care about that too.
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 30 minutes ago
Me - say Robertson is average and deny that he's the joint best LB in the league. Provide evidence of defensive weakness with Walker's dominance of him in game vs Hull (Eriksen goal)
Counter - but the newspaper said he was good!
Rinsed
-----------------------
You - say spurs beat hull 5-0
Counter - When they didn't!
You - say Robertson was dominated by Walker.
Counter - match report in multi selling national newspaper says total opposite.
You - say that that doesn't matter because you were wrong on so many levels!
= Rinsed!
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 11 hours, 29 minutes ago
Absolutely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit sad...
So what if he got beaten down the wing? It's not as though we actually worry about defending..
As long as he has pace, stamina, and can score a goal he's in. Left footed is a bonus.
Definitely a Liverpool standard singing.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by TheWhiteWall (U17633)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Definitely a Liverpool standard singing.
--------------------------------
How a Chelsea fan has the audacity to talk about us signing a young left back with 57 premier league games behind him for £8m, after they signed Rahman Baba for £17m is beyond me.
Rahman Baba - struggle to remember the name!
Just pointing out that this is a classic Liverpool type signing that's all.
You seem very keen to deflect back to Chelsea signings? Champions. Massive difference.
What role did Baba Rahman play in your title victory?
Is he the newest incarnation of Winston Bogarde?
It's a signing that if it works out then we've got a good player for little money, if it doesn't work out we'll make money on him = win/win!
You chaavski mugs can go back to getting mugged off from Man Utd to you're own striker.
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 3 hours, 16 minutes ago
It's a signing that if it works out then we've got a good player for little money, if it doesn't work out we'll make money on him = win/win!
You chaavski mugs can go back to getting mugged off from Man Utd to you're own striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again please, this time in English.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Seems you are very sensitive about the fact that players like Robertson are your standard. Strange. It's not like you've been champions in the last 26 years, so you're hardly a draw for the talent Chelsea are. Plus you're in Liverpool. Which, let's face it, isn't SW6.
Sooner you scousers accept your place in today's game, the easier you'll find it accepting signing players like Robertson.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by TheWhiteWall (U17633)
posted 8 seconds ago
Sooner you scousers accept your place in today's game, the easier you'll find it accepting signing players like Robertson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth best team in the country. I'm cool with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should rename yourself Greatexpectations
Sign in if you want to comment
Robertson, any good?
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 16/7/17
Not at all!
Firstly you should do some research into what you're actually trying to talk about so someone doesn't make you look like a grade a be11end.
posted on 16/7/17
Me - say Robertson is average and deny that he's the joint best LB in the league. Provide evidence of defensive weakness with Walker's dominance of him in game vs Hull (Eriksen goal)
Counter - but the newspaper said he was good!
Rinsed
posted on 16/7/17
It's pretty easy to ridicule someone who can't even remember the score of the game they claimed a player absolutely dominated another player.
The fact the journalist thought the opposite of what you were claiming was just the icing on the cake. It doesn't have to mean the Journo was more right than you are. I'm not about to watch the 90 mins myself to find out and don't really care as it's one game and doesn't prove anything anyway even if Walker destroyed him like no full back has ever been destroyed.
It's still worth ridiculing.
posted on 16/7/17
Far more worrying than the shiiite above, I've just learned that Oxlade-Chamberlain's agent is the same as Raheem's - Aidy Ward.
Not even with your fekin barge pole!
JimmyTheRed
posted on 16/7/17
Meh. I'll have the last laugh when you sign Robertson and he becomes a player you want to sell by summer 2019
posted on 16/7/17
I bet you are the type to actually care about that too.
posted on 16/7/17
Absolutely
posted on 16/7/17
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 30 minutes ago
Me - say Robertson is average and deny that he's the joint best LB in the league. Provide evidence of defensive weakness with Walker's dominance of him in game vs Hull (Eriksen goal)
Counter - but the newspaper said he was good!
Rinsed
-----------------------
You - say spurs beat hull 5-0
Counter - When they didn't!
You - say Robertson was dominated by Walker.
Counter - match report in multi selling national newspaper says total opposite.
You - say that that doesn't matter because you were wrong on so many levels!
= Rinsed!
posted on 17/7/17
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 11 hours, 29 minutes ago
Absolutely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit sad...
posted on 18/7/17
So what if he got beaten down the wing? It's not as though we actually worry about defending..
As long as he has pace, stamina, and can score a goal he's in. Left footed is a bonus.
posted on 18/7/17
Definitely a Liverpool standard singing.
posted on 18/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/7/17
comment by TheWhiteWall (U17633)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Definitely a Liverpool standard singing.
--------------------------------
How a Chelsea fan has the audacity to talk about us signing a young left back with 57 premier league games behind him for £8m, after they signed Rahman Baba for £17m is beyond me.
posted on 18/7/17
Rahman Baba - struggle to remember the name!
posted on 18/7/17
Just pointing out that this is a classic Liverpool type signing that's all.
posted on 18/7/17
You seem very keen to deflect back to Chelsea signings? Champions. Massive difference.
posted on 19/7/17
What role did Baba Rahman play in your title victory?
Is he the newest incarnation of Winston Bogarde?
posted on 19/7/17
Salah £40m
posted on 19/7/17
It's a signing that if it works out then we've got a good player for little money, if it doesn't work out we'll make money on him = win/win!
You chaavski mugs can go back to getting mugged off from Man Utd to you're own striker.
posted on 19/7/17
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 3 hours, 16 minutes ago
It's a signing that if it works out then we've got a good player for little money, if it doesn't work out we'll make money on him = win/win!
You chaavski mugs can go back to getting mugged off from Man Utd to you're own striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again please, this time in English.
posted on 19/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/7/17
Seems you are very sensitive about the fact that players like Robertson are your standard. Strange. It's not like you've been champions in the last 26 years, so you're hardly a draw for the talent Chelsea are. Plus you're in Liverpool. Which, let's face it, isn't SW6.
posted on 19/7/17
Sooner you scousers accept your place in today's game, the easier you'll find it accepting signing players like Robertson.
posted on 19/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/7/17
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by TheWhiteWall (U17633)
posted 8 seconds ago
Sooner you scousers accept your place in today's game, the easier you'll find it accepting signing players like Robertson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth best team in the country. I'm cool with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should rename yourself Greatexpectations
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8