I dont have a problem with it to be honest, and if he was bankrolling arsenal like city an chelsea you wouldn't neither!

Pathetic

"Sell your car"

"No, it's my car"

"Yes but I don't like how you drive it"

"Tough"

you couldnt get wenger out and i doubt and i doubt you'll get kroenke out. in fact knowing your luck, he'll probably increase his shareholding and pisss you lot off even more.

comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 2 minutes ago
you couldnt get wenger out and i doubt and i doubt you'll get kroenke out. in fact knowing your luck, he'll probably increase his shareholding and pisss you lot off even more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Yeah but if they sign a petition.

comment by Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 2 minutes ago
you couldnt get wenger out and i doubt and i doubt you'll get kroenke out. in fact knowing your luck, he'll probably increase his shareholding and pisss you lot off even more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Yeah but if they sign a petition.
-------------------------------
Maybe he'll put a price on Claude's head, so every game you'll get people out hunting.

Should make Arsenal tv a better watch every week.

Is there a petition to shoot live animals during half time at the emirates? I'd sign that

When city come we can shoot Sanchez dogs instead.

comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 2 minutes ago
When city come we can shoot Sanchez dogs instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by RedMen7 (U8888)
posted 44 minutes ago
I dont have a problem with it to be honest, and if he was bankrolling arsenal like city an chelsea you wouldn't neither!

Pathetic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In fairness I know a lot of Arsenal fans (myself) included who don't want a sugar daddy financing "success". We simply don't need it, we also don't need a leech like Kroenke regardless of his out of football behaviour.

He just broke our club transfer record 2 weeks ago

comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 2 minutes ago
He just broke our club transfer record 2 weeks ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With whose money?

Well it is his money he owns the club.

comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 8 minutes ago
Well it is his money he owns the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to Abramovic putting his money into Chelsea then?

So it's not his money. Yet it's his fault we don't spend enough?

First comment - I dont have a problem with it to be honest, and if he was bankrolling arsenal like city an chelsea you wouldn't neither!

Pathetic
------------------

Me - In fairness I know a lot of Arsenal fans (myself) included who don't want a sugar daddy financing "success". We simply don't need it, we also don't need a leech like Kroenke regardless of his out of football behaviour.

You - He just broke our club transfer record 2 weeks ago

Me - With whose money?

You - Well it is his money he owns the club.

Me - Comparable to Abramovic putting his money into Chelsea then?

You - So it's not his money. Yet it's his fault we don't spend enough?
-----------------------------
The bloke bought the club as football clubs like Arsenal gain value rapidly. He will make hundreds of millions should he sell - that's all he's here for.

Have we improved since his takeover?

Do we need him to succeed?

Is he pumping his money in like Abramovic (see my first comment)?

Signed.

Getting up towards 30,000 signatures already.

It's not really his personal money as such. Our transfers are funded by arsenals own profits from sponsorship, tv money, sales etc. Kronke doesn't add personal money into Arsenal as far as I'm aware

He really is not the right fit for the Arsenal lacks any desire or passion for the club IMO.

Signed

Not bothered in the slightest. The despotic Saudi royal family, one of the most ruthless regimes in the world today, are one of Liverpool's sponsors, but nobody says a word.

Why are we only doing a petition because of a hunting channel? We should have done one when we started selling our best players to our rivals and stopped competing seriously for the PL and CL.

Weird people think he's just in it to sell. If he was he wouldn't own so many other teams

Your owner is a complete and utter kunnnt and you're straight in with comments about City.

Pathetic

Signed, btw. What a twaatt

comment by RedMen7 (U8888)
posted 10 hours, 41 minutes ago
I dont have a problem with it to be honest, and if he was bankrolling arsenal like city an chelsea you wouldn't neither!

Pathetic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It promotes the shooting of endangered species and has been reported as having some comments about shooting elephants, lions and other animals I find unacceptable. I have no problem with hunting and killing animals but only for food. One particular program apparently talks about a shot with an arrow being particularly good that did lung and liver damage on what I think was a rare or possibly endangered animal while they were waiting for it to die of blood loss from the shot and one of its lungs would have been filling with blood.

If you find that acceptable I think you will be in the minority.

Maybe you should complain to the countries governments which allow and encourage it