kane

Kane

Sterling is on better form but Kane will always get goals and goals win games

Is this a serious question?

Kane and Sterling are both in that second tier of top Prem players alongside Salah/Ozil/Sanchez/Martial etc but definitely not in the top tier of Prem player like Hazard/Coutinho/De Gea/Pogba/Rooney/Rashford

Come on ffs Sterling is 19 years old and only made 5 mins appearance in the CL Wednesday for us.

To soon to start comparing them

Come on ffs Sterling is 19 years old and only made 5 mins appearance in the CL Wednesday for us.

To soon to start comparing them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good one

comment by Mark O'Hara (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
Kane and Sterling are both in that second tier of top Prem players alongside Salah/Ozil/Sanchez/Martial etc but definitely not in the top tier of Prem player like Hazard/Coutinho/De Gea/Pogba/Rooney/Rashford
----------------------------------------------------------------------
wow, every article

Kane and Sterling are both in that second tier of top Prem players alongside Salah/Ozil/Sanchez/Martial etc but definitely not in the top tier of Prem player like Hazard/Coutinho/De Gea/Pogba/Rooney/Rashford
---------------------------------------------------------------------

And how did you come up with that dodgy tier system of random players?

Kane. Then we just need to spend another £100m each on Sane and Mane and have a front 3 of Sane, Kane and Mane.

Rooney.

comment by -Baz-tango-in-Paris (U19119)
posted 54 seconds ago
Rooney.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane+Sterling=Rooney/2

For £100m I'd want both and some change

comment by sᴉɥƃuǝlפ (U19365)
posted 1 minute ago
For £100m I'd want both and some change
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, change definitely needed at Liverpool.

Is that a serious question?

I know Arsenal love buying attacking midfielders but surely the answer is very obviously Kane.

If I was spending £100m on a single player Sterling and Kane would not be near the top of my shopping list.

Is that a serious question?

I know Arsenal love buying attacking midfielders but surely the answer is very obviously Kane.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It's just a question at the end of the work day.
Most people have said Kane, but if your team already has a good striker, then is it worth spending 100mil on another striker?

comment by WOKO - thats Wenger out, Kronke out. Xhaka is crapper (U16927)
posted 3 minutes ago
If I was spending £100m on a single player Sterling and Kane would not be near the top of my shopping list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rooney.

£100m would be seen as a bargain for Kane in todays market, or at least a good price.

Can't see why anyone would want to pay £100m (double what he was bought for) for a City flop though.

The figure is irrelevent to be honest,
you could get either player, for the same price, who would you choose for your team excluding City or THFC fans?

comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 1 minute ago
The figure is irrelevent to be honest,
you could get either player, for the same price, who would you choose for your team excluding City or THFC fans?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rooney

comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 7 minutes ago
Is that a serious question?

I know Arsenal love buying attacking midfielders but surely the answer is very obviously Kane.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It's just a question at the end of the work day.
Most people have said Kane, but if your team already has a good striker, then is it worth spending 100mil on another striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fair enough, I just think there's quite a gap in quality.

I rate Sterling and think he'll end up being an excellent player but I'd pick Kane without hesitation.

Alli or Sterling would be much closer imo.

comment by Can Solo (U6997)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 7 minutes ago
Is that a serious question?

I know Arsenal love buying attacking midfielders but surely the answer is very obviously Kane.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It's just a question at the end of the work day.
Most people have said Kane, but if your team already has a good striker, then is it worth spending 100mil on another striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fair enough, I just think there's quite a gap in quality.

I rate Sterling and think he'll end up being an excellent player but I'd pick Kane without hesitation.

Alli or Sterling would be much closer imo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rooney

Is that a serious question?

I know Arsenal love buying attacking midfielders but surely the answer is very obviously Kane.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It's just a question at the end of the work day.
Most people have said Kane, but if your team already has a good striker, then is it worth spending 100mil on another striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fair enough, I just think there's quite a gap in quality.

I rate Sterling and think he'll end up being an excellent player but I'd pick Kane without hesitation.

Alli or Sterling would be much closer imo.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
True,Alli and Sterling would be a better comparison.
The main reason i used these 2 is because i believe right now, they're Englands 2 best players.

if we are talking for england than lallana, rashford, alli are all better than sterling.