Agree. Giroud is a much better olayer than he gets credit for and we should keep him and offer A) More money for Auba instead of €50m (worth more than that imo) or B) offer them Welbz

If we do sign Aubameyang then what's the point of keeping Giroud if he can barely get any game time in the PL already?

comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 9 minutes ago
If we do sign Aubameyang then what's the point of keeping Giroud if he can barely get any game time in the PL already?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We havent got a plan B. Why cant we just keep players that contributes for once? You will say that he may have an interest to leave because of the WC. I give a fack on that. Arsenal interest comes first.

I do think he will moving though and going on loan as the Kicker reporting.

If Giroud starts all the remaining games he will probably score as many, of not more goals then lacazette

If we do sign Aubameyang then what's the point of keeping Giroud if he can barely get any game time in the PL already?
————
This is true. Giroud is better than a plan B he deserved to be starting more games but not for us if we have Aub and Laca.
I love Giroud but Aub is a real goal scorer and I believe he will score goals wherever he is (I hope lol).

f Giroud starts all the remaining games he will probably score as many, of not more goals then lacazette
—————-
But we spent loads on lacazette so we have to use him more. They will score toughly the same amount of goals but Giroud always seems to score more as an impact sub for us.

I love Giroud but Aub is a real goal scorer and I believe he will score goals wherever he is (I hope lol).

Hope you wont be disappointed.

Giroud doesn’t want to be a plan b tho. Aubameyang is the quality we need, if Dortmund want giroud then it makes sense to involve him.

Giroud offers something completely different which has been very useful for us. I’d like aubameyang and keep Giroud, but I suppose that’d mean aubameyang played more on the wing, or Lacazette dropped. I think if we got rid of Giroud we’d miss what he offers the team. But then maybe we’d have Aubameyang who could potentially score a load of goals, depending where you play him. With Giroud you know what you’ve getting, I feel Aubameyang could go either way

fack off

Giroud is one of those "he does a job" "offers something a bit different" but just isn't that great - strikers

If moving him on secures and an actual top striker it's a no brainer

Honestly I expect Auba on the wing. He wont replace Laca.

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 14 minutes ago
Honestly I expect Auba on the wing. He wont replace Laca.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I think you're right although if he does come I'd hope to see him become first choice CF

Rather see laca on the wing than Aubamayang. Unlike Laca he actually gets into the box and has great movement.

Castor praying for a 2019, Giroud/Cazorla reunion to bring us to title glory.

It will be a loan. I would take that. We have goals enough for 6th.

It's funny how no one is interested in Welbeck

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 6 hours, 9 minutes ago
It's funny how no one is interested in Welbeck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Calling Welbeck a striker is harsh on real strikers