For us? Impossible actually!

No don’t want him back....

He can only play in a 442

So unless we change formation it will never happen.

Lets move on.

This is McCormack's most recent outing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf0hpWi2qog
Yes, he left us on bad terms, but he also scored a pile of goals in his last season. There is an argument for being pragmatic here. He's miles ahead of what we have at the moment.

My mum could score goals in the Australian leagues.

I would get Alan Smith too back with Ross, then Bob's uncle, with the 2 Becks as backup, Snoddy and Howsy in the middle - mighty stuff..

My goodness, we are an unforgiving lot, aren't we?

On loan...yes

We are too poor to pay his wages or buy him. Not happening.

I'd much rather have Becchio!.

Peter Orouke formerly of sky reckons we've spent our transfer budget and cannot afford to make a move for anyone else. I hope he's joking tbh

No no no please why do people want to look back to go froward?

comment by Kernow White (U21542)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
No no no please why do people want to look back to go froward?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

When we've sold really good players and replaced them with dross.

Given a choice, personally I'd have Snoddy back over McCormack. Think he offers more to the team.

Both are wildly unrealistic signings. The worst is when people say we should resign beckford, or Becchio (even Alan Smith, though I choose to hope that was a joke). These are not progressive signings. McCormack has already proved how little he cares about Leeds.

People question Lasogga for his comittment and then want us to sign someone who was equally uncomitted, and who has struggled to find form and appearances at one of our playoff rivals.

Agree with Lubo..... I know I know

Macattack?
No thank you. He’ll never be the same player that he was for us again.

Also : “According to Football Insider, Leeds have no money left in their transfer kitty for permanent deals and have called off the search for a new striker.”

No money left? Where’s the Wood and CT money gone?

Oh, he’s back from Melbourne and back at Villa now but unlikely to play under Bruce.

comment by Peakwhite (U7815)
posted 12 hours, 11 minutes ago
Macattack?
No thank you. He’ll never be the same player that he was for us again.

Also : “According to Football Insider, Leeds have no money left in their transfer kitty for permanent deals and have called off the search for a new striker.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would we have been trying to sign a striker the other day then? It's a nothing story.

Might as well put this story to bed, because he can't possibly play us as it would be breaking the rules. Already played for 2 clubs this season

comment by lufc - Harrogate (U6810)
posted 43 minutes ago
Might as well put this story to bed, because he can't possibly play us as it would be breaking the rules. Already played for 2 clubs this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. It ain’t gonna happen! Next?

comment by Lubo - Feel the Vurn! (U14008)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by Peakwhite (U7815)
posted 12 hours, 11 minutes ago
Macattack?
No thank you. He’ll never be the same player that he was for us again.

Also : “According to Football Insider, Leeds have no money left in their transfer kitty for permanent deals and have called off the search for a new striker.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would we have been trying to sign a striker the other day then? It's a nothing story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s the evidence about us trying to sign a new striker? They’re ALL nothing stories!