comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - If he asked me to I would move to Egypt just to iron Salah's socks. (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
She's in my loft anyway and seems fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are something else, condoning violence, joking about a dead child. Hope your parents fecked you out of the house early so they dont have to deal with their cuuunt of a son.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This house?
https://tinyurl.com/yb2uh9r3
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - If he asked me to I would move to Egypt just to iron Salah's socks. (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
She's in my loft anyway and seems fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are something else, condoning violence, joking about a dead child. Hope your parents fecked you out of the house early so they dont have to deal with their cuuunt of a son.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - 2017 joy squids (U2958)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - If he asked me to I would move to Egypt just to iron Salah's socks. (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
She's in my loft anyway and seems fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are something else, condoning violence, joking about a dead child. Hope your parents fecked you out of the house early so they dont have to deal with their cuuunt of a son.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's only messing about... I know this because she's actually in my basement and FAR from fine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never knew the McCanns posted on JA
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard them accused of various things, but never that they were involved in the death of the nobel peace prize winning scientist.
Time to get investigating.
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - 2017 joy squids (U2958)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard them accused of various things, but never that they were involved in the death of the nobel peace prize winning scientist.
Time to get investigating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooooops “killed her”
Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
Could you rate yourself please?
Using the graph below rate how much you like kids
McCanns 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 Jimmy Saville
Just on Arabs theory that the Government knew what happened.
Gordon Brown put one of his spin doctors on the case. A prat called Clarence Mitchell. He pretty much lied in every comment about the McCanns that he made.
At the very least they should have been prosecuted. It would be very interesting what would have come out during a trial. There seems to be a lack of pressure on them. Every avenue should have been explored, and if they were the most viable suspects, they should have faced trial.
I do wonder though, had it happened in this country, would it have turned out different. Did foreign politics play any part in there not being a trial?
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the kids gone, no sign of a break in, parents last to see her, Maddie blood found in the apartment, scent of death found in the apartment as well by trained dogs. Worth noting scent of death only found in one apartment, guess which one
comment by rosso is facking happy (U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
Why would they cover up an accident?
................
Panic.
.................
What reason would they have to do that?
.................
Guilt
................
How much did Amaral make from his book?
.................
Who cares. It is irrelevant.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 27 minutes ago
Sick pervs deserve a neck shot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about murderous cretins what do they deserve
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the kids gone, no sign of a break in, parents last to see her, Maddie blood found in the apartment, scent of death found in the apartment as well by trained dogs. Worth noting scent of death only found in one apartment, guess which one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So is that proof they killed her?
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 7 minutes ago
Why would they cover up an accident?
................
Panic.
.................
What reason would they have to do that?
.................
Guilt
................
How much did Amaral make from his book?
.................
Who cares. It is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Panic. That's ridiculous. If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened. You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
It's not irrelevant. His lies in the book were debunked but he made a fortune on it anyway.
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
vidicschin, nicely summed up.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 7 minutes ago
Why would they cover up an accident?
................
Panic.
.................
What reason would they have to do that?
.................
Guilt
................
How much did Amaral make from his book?
.................
Who cares. It is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Panic. That's ridiculous. If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened. You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
It's not irrelevant. His lies in the book were debunked but he made a fortune on it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depending how the "accident" happened. And if she was already dead when they got back. Panic would be a logical reaction. Whether you or I would have hidden the body isn't here or there. People are capable of many things in a blind panic.
Not saying this is what happened btw, in case you try to spin it that way.
As for the book, was it debunked as lies, and by whom?
If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened.
..................
I can see it now. 'I think I may have accidentally killed my child'.
.................
You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
.....................
Are you saying they should have left it around, after claiming someone had taken the child? Good grief.
...................
It's not irrelevant.
.............
It really is.
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the book says her father was standing at the window when it happened. Can't you read?
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the book says her father was standing at the window when it happened. Can't you read?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not talking about the book. I haven't read it so can't comment. I can however see it's possible that they came home, found her dead after some sort of accident and covered it up.
Them being involved is the only reason they wouldn't answer the police's questions.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened.
..................
I can see it now. 'I think I may have accidentally killed my child'.
.................
You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
.....................
Are you saying they should have left it around, after claiming someone had taken the child? Good grief.
...................
It's not irrelevant.
.............
It really is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The book didn't claim they accidentally killed the child, you've made that up. The removal of the body would have had to come before claiming an abduction. Jesus, you're bloody stupid.
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the book says her father was standing at the window when it happened. Can't you read?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not talking about the book. I haven't read it so can't comment. I can however see it's possible that they came home, found her dead after some sort of accident and covered it up.
Them being involved is the only reason they wouldn't answer the police's questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So wtf are you arguing my points for when we're specifically talking about the book you imbecile? Wasting my bloody time because of your lack of intelligence.
I'm out. Bloody arguing with dumb and dumber here.
Sign in if you want to comment
One rule for the McCanns....
Page 8 of 22
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - If he asked me to I would move to Egypt just to iron Salah's socks. (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
She's in my loft anyway and seems fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are something else, condoning violence, joking about a dead child. Hope your parents fecked you out of the house early so they dont have to deal with their cuuunt of a son.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This house?
https://tinyurl.com/yb2uh9r3
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - If he asked me to I would move to Egypt just to iron Salah's socks. (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
She's in my loft anyway and seems fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are something else, condoning violence, joking about a dead child. Hope your parents fecked you out of the house early so they dont have to deal with their cuuunt of a son.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - 2017 joy squids (U2958)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - If he asked me to I would move to Egypt just to iron Salah's socks. (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
She's in my loft anyway and seems fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are something else, condoning violence, joking about a dead child. Hope your parents fecked you out of the house early so they dont have to deal with their cuuunt of a son.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's only messing about... I know this because she's actually in my basement and FAR from fine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never knew the McCanns posted on JA
posted on 1/5/18
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard them accused of various things, but never that they were involved in the death of the nobel peace prize winning scientist.
Time to get investigating.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - 2017 joy squids (U2958)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard them accused of various things, but never that they were involved in the death of the nobel peace prize winning scientist.
Time to get investigating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooooops “killed her”
posted on 1/5/18
Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
Could you rate yourself please?
Using the graph below rate how much you like kids
McCanns 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 Jimmy Saville
posted on 1/5/18
Just on Arabs theory that the Government knew what happened.
Gordon Brown put one of his spin doctors on the case. A prat called Clarence Mitchell. He pretty much lied in every comment about the McCanns that he made.
posted on 1/5/18
At the very least they should have been prosecuted. It would be very interesting what would have come out during a trial. There seems to be a lack of pressure on them. Every avenue should have been explored, and if they were the most viable suspects, they should have faced trial.
I do wonder though, had it happened in this country, would it have turned out different. Did foreign politics play any part in there not being a trial?
posted on 1/5/18
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the kids gone, no sign of a break in, parents last to see her, Maddie blood found in the apartment, scent of death found in the apartment as well by trained dogs. Worth noting scent of death only found in one apartment, guess which one
posted on 1/5/18
comment by rosso is facking happy (U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
posted on 1/5/18
Why would they cover up an accident?
................
Panic.
.................
What reason would they have to do that?
.................
Guilt
................
How much did Amaral make from his book?
.................
Who cares. It is irrelevant.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 27 minutes ago
Sick pervs deserve a neck shot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about murderous cretins what do they deserve
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
at least they didn't kill the kid and act like she had been kidnapped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s your proof that they killed Einstein?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the kids gone, no sign of a break in, parents last to see her, Maddie blood found in the apartment, scent of death found in the apartment as well by trained dogs. Worth noting scent of death only found in one apartment, guess which one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So is that proof they killed her?
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 7 minutes ago
Why would they cover up an accident?
................
Panic.
.................
What reason would they have to do that?
.................
Guilt
................
How much did Amaral make from his book?
.................
Who cares. It is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Panic. That's ridiculous. If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened. You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
It's not irrelevant. His lies in the book were debunked but he made a fortune on it anyway.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
posted on 1/5/18
vidicschin, nicely summed up.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
posted on 1/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 7 minutes ago
Why would they cover up an accident?
................
Panic.
.................
What reason would they have to do that?
.................
Guilt
................
How much did Amaral make from his book?
.................
Who cares. It is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Panic. That's ridiculous. If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened. You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
It's not irrelevant. His lies in the book were debunked but he made a fortune on it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depending how the "accident" happened. And if she was already dead when they got back. Panic would be a logical reaction. Whether you or I would have hidden the body isn't here or there. People are capable of many things in a blind panic.
Not saying this is what happened btw, in case you try to spin it that way.
As for the book, was it debunked as lies, and by whom?
posted on 1/5/18
If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened.
..................
I can see it now. 'I think I may have accidentally killed my child'.
.................
You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
.....................
Are you saying they should have left it around, after claiming someone had taken the child? Good grief.
...................
It's not irrelevant.
.............
It really is.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the book says her father was standing at the window when it happened. Can't you read?
posted on 1/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the book says her father was standing at the window when it happened. Can't you read?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not talking about the book. I haven't read it so can't comment. I can however see it's possible that they came home, found her dead after some sort of accident and covered it up.
Them being involved is the only reason they wouldn't answer the police's questions.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
If your child had an accident you'd be calling an ambulance and explaining what happened.
..................
I can see it now. 'I think I may have accidentally killed my child'.
.................
You wouldn't get rid of the body ffs
.....................
Are you saying they should have left it around, after claiming someone had taken the child? Good grief.
...................
It's not irrelevant.
.............
It really is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The book didn't claim they accidentally killed the child, you've made that up. The removal of the body would have had to come before claiming an abduction. Jesus, you're bloody stupid.
posted on 1/5/18
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is facking happy(U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
The actual police also think they know what happened (to an extent).
------------------
What do they think happened, in a nutshell?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy who led the Portuguese police's initial investigation, Gonçalo Amaral (amongst others involved in the investigation) believed that Madeleine died in an accident and the McCanns tried to cover it up.
The Portuguese police worked with this theory, which is well supported by circumstantial evidence, for years. Amaral wrote a book about it and the McCanns tried (and failed) to get it banned. They then sued Amaral and the publishers for libel, covering their legal fees with Madeleine's fund. And eventually lost again.
The British press (in particular the Sun) has tried to vilify Amaral as a disgraced and incompetent officer, neither of which is true.
The Portuguese public have certainly made their minds up about the McCanns. And they have been exposed to all of the evidence and theories presented by the police. Not just the bits the British press has wanted to pedal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would they cover up an accident? What reason would they have to do that? How much did Amaral make from his book?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd have gone to prison for neglect obviously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His book says the father was right outside the window when Madelaine feel from the sofa and died. How would it be neglect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they'd spent the night in a bar eating and drinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the book says her father was standing at the window when it happened. Can't you read?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not talking about the book. I haven't read it so can't comment. I can however see it's possible that they came home, found her dead after some sort of accident and covered it up.
Them being involved is the only reason they wouldn't answer the police's questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So wtf are you arguing my points for when we're specifically talking about the book you imbecile? Wasting my bloody time because of your lack of intelligence.
I'm out. Bloody arguing with dumb and dumber here.
Page 8 of 22
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13