I will be more optimistic if they persevere with the defensive line-up they used against Spurs.
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 minutes ago
So the Guardian (the most anti City paper out there) has invented a new buzzword but unfortunately for them, you're to only person to have adopted it.
Let's have a party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
anti Man City paper?
wtf, paranoid clown.. Just because they don't print the UAE has rainbows and unicorns theyre anti city?
If you're owned by an official of an authoritarian government that convincts and imprisons on a whim rather than evidence, all the while pouring masses of wealth from government entities into the club to "buy" opinion then you get what comes to you.
then you get what comes to you
————————
Which is what exactly?
A few harsh words from impotent no-nothing posters on an insignificant forum?
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 9 minutes ago
then you get what comes to you
————————
Which is what exactly?
A few harsh words from impotent no-nothing posters on an insignificant forum?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask Inky, he already had his tinfoil hat on regarding anti-Man City newspapers ffs
no, I’ve asked you.
You said it, so you tell me
David Conn wrote a fekin book on our Arab takeover and it wasn't complimentary.
Barney Ronay writes a weekly article slating us.
Colin Schindler, a regular contributor has totally continually denounces us despite making a healthy wedge from his book and film "Manchester United Ruined My Life".
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
David Conn wrote a fekin book on our Arab takeover and it wasn't complimentary.
Barney Ronay writes a weekly article slating us.
==========
People would be hating your owners even if they didn't own City.
They don't hate them because of City, they hate them because they are the closest thing to Hitler we have in the modern world and they happen to own City.
You need to understand that City is just a small pawn in this game.
People have been fighting your despicable owners since before they owned City you know, fighting for multitudes of suffering women, men and children
The sheikh bought you and other entities as a pawn to control opinion about themselves. You are part of the game.
If people are against your owner, its victimous of you to claim they are against your club when in truth they are fighting for a multitude of human beings who suffer at the whim of a few, not fighting against City or because its City.
Now anyone fighting for justice and human rights has to get past some extra opposition from some sports fans who perceive all criticism of the sheikh as criticism towards their club.
Your owner is a piece of sheet. You love it when he dopes you up but you feel any criticism is unjust.
You were desperate enough to sell out to a despot. Enjoy the success but you must also take the ridicule, abuse and resentment that comes with it like a man and stop crying.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
no, I’ve asked you.
You said it, so you tell me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your owners don’t get flack because they own City.
They get flack anyway, for someone to claim they are only getting that due to owning City is disingenuous.
Why do you think they are throwing money into sports? It’s not exactly a lucrative venture for them, however they understand that sports carries with it a huge following, fanatical - that’s why they’re called fans.
Twitter had Man City fans defending their owner over Matthew Hedges ffs.
They have effectively purchased part of public opinion and turned it to be ardent support of themselves and by extension their regime.
“Ah we know he’s a despot but he’s our benefactor of a despot so we have to defend, deflect and engage in whatabouttery”
It really is exactly what happens, Inky is an absolute case study of that even going to the extent that papers have an agenda v City because of the owner. That’s what “Sports Washing” does, as No Love says, they would be scathing no matter if he owned a football club or not.
The fact he owns a British football club puts him in the limelight and makes him more present to receive condemnation for actions he and his government take.
If you’re too chequebook blind to see it, that’s on you.
These are serious issues for many people in the world and it should be taken with the seriousness it deserves.
How much suffering is a trophy worth?
How many lives is a trophy worth?
Literally sold soul to devil.
Twitter had Man City fans defending their owner over Matthew Hedges ffs.
So a handful of anonymous people are now a voice to be reckoned with.
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Twitter had Man City fans defending their owner over Matthew Hedges ffs.
So a handful of anonymous people are now a voice to be reckoned with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just shows that “sports washing” is a real thing.. you might want to laugh it off but you’re as afflicted by it as anyone else.
At least you’ve given up denying it, you’ll accept it soon enough.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 52 minutes ago
These are serious issues for many people in the world and it should be taken with the seriousness it deserves.
How much suffering is a trophy worth?
How many lives is a trophy worth?
Literally sold soul to devil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You shouldn’t mention lives considering your fans were responsible for so many lost ones.
Over a trophy.
Fooking hypocrite caaant.
comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 52 minutes ago
These are serious issues for many people in the world and it should be taken with the seriousness it deserves.
How much suffering is a trophy worth?
How many lives is a trophy worth?
Literally sold soul to devil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You shouldn’t mention lives considering your fans were responsible for so many lost ones.
Over a trophy.
Fooking hypocrite caaant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want, you can point out where No Love excused the actions that you refer to so that your claim of he being a hypocrite can be validated.
That is unless you cannot, at which case you’re a simple cant
Ignores the actions of his fans, I have seen no condemnation ever from him.
Hence hypocrite.
Simple enough for you.
comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 14 seconds ago
Ignores the actions of his fans, I have seen no condemnation ever from him.
Hence hypocrite.
Simple enough for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are, just because you haven’t seen him condemn something 30 years ago.
Try again you simple cant.. if you want to persist in deflecting the topic of conversation away from Mansour.
Pranks, get a hold of your thread ffs.
Still waiting for someone to post concrete evidence that the Sheikh is personally involved in torture or had influence over this court case.
I'll have a look on Twitter.
So you shouldn’t condemn something after a certain amount of time has passed, the Germans will be happ about that.
He’s a hypocrite he’s never on here as far as I know said anything about it yet is trying to point score against city fans using human rights and deaths in a another country.
Your clubs shirt sponsors have been done for laundering saudi money used in terrorism and has been accused of involvement in human rights abuses in Tibet.
Not seen any comdemnation from any of you over that.
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Still waiting for someone to post concrete evidence that the Sheikh is personally involved in torture or had influence over this court case.
I'll have a look on Twitter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he had nothing to do with the pardon?
He still very much represents the UAE government with your main corporate sponsor being a state owned entity from the UAE, the wealth that Mansour extolls comes from the UAE state coffers via the natural resources with him being in a privileged position in the UAE government.
That is freely
.. available as info.
Man City are the UAEs flag bearer in the UK. Whatever you want to turn a blind eye to is on you.
So you won’t address your shirt sponsors links with human rights abuses or laundering money for terrorism by the Saudis.
Or the damage your fans have done to innocent people’s lives.
What ever you turn a blind eye to is up to you.
comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 28 minutes ago
So you won’t address your shirt sponsors links with human rights abuses or laundering money for terrorism by the Saudis.
Or the damage your fans have done to innocent people’s lives.
What ever you turn a blind eye to is up to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you on about you sports washed fool? You’re Doug exactly what the UAE government wanted, is to engage in deflection and whatabouttery to defend their regime.
You’re just straight making things up now just like Inky (saying Liverpool is owned by the US government wtf )
Show me where you find Standard Chartered involved in money laundering for Saudi terrorism..
You’ll find Standard Chartered pulled out of a Saudi event due to human rights abuses.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-45876239
What you make up due to your blind eye is up to you.
https://amp.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/20/standard-chartered-fined-300m-money-laundering-compliance
Not made up
And you don’t know about your clubs partnership withy he Chinese water company that’s commiting human rights abuses in tibet.
Your own clubs official water partnership?
Easy to look the other way for you it seems.
so not laundering money for terrorism like you made up then, wow you're wrong a lot.
as for tibet water, what can the fans do.. oh yeah we can join a protest and we did, guess before which game..
yup..
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42655418
so showing you how its done when its time to call your despot owner to account.
Your defacto owners, the UAE, can bang up a guy for life on false charges via a confession he didnt understand without access to a lawyer.
Not a peep out of city fans except to draw conclusions about the guys actions.
Whats the matter? afraid of getting your hands chopped off?
Sign in if you want to comment
Top 6 Season 2021/22 Mini Table
Page 14 of 53
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
posted on 26/11/18
I will be more optimistic if they persevere with the defensive line-up they used against Spurs.
posted on 26/11/18
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 minutes ago
So the Guardian (the most anti City paper out there) has invented a new buzzword but unfortunately for them, you're to only person to have adopted it.
Let's have a party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
anti Man City paper?
wtf, paranoid clown.. Just because they don't print the UAE has rainbows and unicorns theyre anti city?
If you're owned by an official of an authoritarian government that convincts and imprisons on a whim rather than evidence, all the while pouring masses of wealth from government entities into the club to "buy" opinion then you get what comes to you.
posted on 26/11/18
then you get what comes to you
————————
Which is what exactly?
A few harsh words from impotent no-nothing posters on an insignificant forum?
posted on 26/11/18
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 9 minutes ago
then you get what comes to you
————————
Which is what exactly?
A few harsh words from impotent no-nothing posters on an insignificant forum?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask Inky, he already had his tinfoil hat on regarding anti-Man City newspapers ffs
posted on 26/11/18
no, I’ve asked you.
You said it, so you tell me
posted on 26/11/18
David Conn wrote a fekin book on our Arab takeover and it wasn't complimentary.
Barney Ronay writes a weekly article slating us.
Colin Schindler, a regular contributor has totally continually denounces us despite making a healthy wedge from his book and film "Manchester United Ruined My Life".
posted on 26/11/18
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
David Conn wrote a fekin book on our Arab takeover and it wasn't complimentary.
Barney Ronay writes a weekly article slating us.
==========
People would be hating your owners even if they didn't own City.
They don't hate them because of City, they hate them because they are the closest thing to Hitler we have in the modern world and they happen to own City.
You need to understand that City is just a small pawn in this game.
People have been fighting your despicable owners since before they owned City you know, fighting for multitudes of suffering women, men and children
The sheikh bought you and other entities as a pawn to control opinion about themselves. You are part of the game.
If people are against your owner, its victimous of you to claim they are against your club when in truth they are fighting for a multitude of human beings who suffer at the whim of a few, not fighting against City or because its City.
Now anyone fighting for justice and human rights has to get past some extra opposition from some sports fans who perceive all criticism of the sheikh as criticism towards their club.
Your owner is a piece of sheet. You love it when he dopes you up but you feel any criticism is unjust.
You were desperate enough to sell out to a despot. Enjoy the success but you must also take the ridicule, abuse and resentment that comes with it like a man and stop crying.
posted on 26/11/18
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
no, I’ve asked you.
You said it, so you tell me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your owners don’t get flack because they own City.
They get flack anyway, for someone to claim they are only getting that due to owning City is disingenuous.
Why do you think they are throwing money into sports? It’s not exactly a lucrative venture for them, however they understand that sports carries with it a huge following, fanatical - that’s why they’re called fans.
Twitter had Man City fans defending their owner over Matthew Hedges ffs.
They have effectively purchased part of public opinion and turned it to be ardent support of themselves and by extension their regime.
“Ah we know he’s a despot but he’s our benefactor of a despot so we have to defend, deflect and engage in whatabouttery”
It really is exactly what happens, Inky is an absolute case study of that even going to the extent that papers have an agenda v City because of the owner. That’s what “Sports Washing” does, as No Love says, they would be scathing no matter if he owned a football club or not.
The fact he owns a British football club puts him in the limelight and makes him more present to receive condemnation for actions he and his government take.
If you’re too chequebook blind to see it, that’s on you.
posted on 27/11/18
These are serious issues for many people in the world and it should be taken with the seriousness it deserves.
How much suffering is a trophy worth?
How many lives is a trophy worth?
Literally sold soul to devil.
posted on 27/11/18
Twitter had Man City fans defending their owner over Matthew Hedges ffs.
So a handful of anonymous people are now a voice to be reckoned with.
posted on 27/11/18
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Twitter had Man City fans defending their owner over Matthew Hedges ffs.
So a handful of anonymous people are now a voice to be reckoned with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just shows that “sports washing” is a real thing.. you might want to laugh it off but you’re as afflicted by it as anyone else.
At least you’ve given up denying it, you’ll accept it soon enough.
posted on 27/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 52 minutes ago
These are serious issues for many people in the world and it should be taken with the seriousness it deserves.
How much suffering is a trophy worth?
How many lives is a trophy worth?
Literally sold soul to devil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You shouldn’t mention lives considering your fans were responsible for so many lost ones.
Over a trophy.
Fooking hypocrite caaant.
posted on 27/11/18
comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 52 minutes ago
These are serious issues for many people in the world and it should be taken with the seriousness it deserves.
How much suffering is a trophy worth?
How many lives is a trophy worth?
Literally sold soul to devil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You shouldn’t mention lives considering your fans were responsible for so many lost ones.
Over a trophy.
Fooking hypocrite caaant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want, you can point out where No Love excused the actions that you refer to so that your claim of he being a hypocrite can be validated.
That is unless you cannot, at which case you’re a simple cant
posted on 27/11/18
Ignores the actions of his fans, I have seen no condemnation ever from him.
Hence hypocrite.
Simple enough for you.
posted on 27/11/18
comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 14 seconds ago
Ignores the actions of his fans, I have seen no condemnation ever from him.
Hence hypocrite.
Simple enough for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are, just because you haven’t seen him condemn something 30 years ago.
Try again you simple cant.. if you want to persist in deflecting the topic of conversation away from Mansour.
posted on 27/11/18
Pranks, get a hold of your thread ffs.
posted on 27/11/18
Still waiting for someone to post concrete evidence that the Sheikh is personally involved in torture or had influence over this court case.
I'll have a look on Twitter.
posted on 27/11/18
So you shouldn’t condemn something after a certain amount of time has passed, the Germans will be happ about that.
He’s a hypocrite he’s never on here as far as I know said anything about it yet is trying to point score against city fans using human rights and deaths in a another country.
Your clubs shirt sponsors have been done for laundering saudi money used in terrorism and has been accused of involvement in human rights abuses in Tibet.
Not seen any comdemnation from any of you over that.
posted on 27/11/18
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Still waiting for someone to post concrete evidence that the Sheikh is personally involved in torture or had influence over this court case.
I'll have a look on Twitter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he had nothing to do with the pardon?
He still very much represents the UAE government with your main corporate sponsor being a state owned entity from the UAE, the wealth that Mansour extolls comes from the UAE state coffers via the natural resources with him being in a privileged position in the UAE government.
That is freely
posted on 27/11/18
.. available as info.
Man City are the UAEs flag bearer in the UK. Whatever you want to turn a blind eye to is on you.
posted on 27/11/18
So you won’t address your shirt sponsors links with human rights abuses or laundering money for terrorism by the Saudis.
Or the damage your fans have done to innocent people’s lives.
What ever you turn a blind eye to is up to you.
posted on 27/11/18
comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 28 minutes ago
So you won’t address your shirt sponsors links with human rights abuses or laundering money for terrorism by the Saudis.
Or the damage your fans have done to innocent people’s lives.
What ever you turn a blind eye to is up to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you on about you sports washed fool? You’re Doug exactly what the UAE government wanted, is to engage in deflection and whatabouttery to defend their regime.
You’re just straight making things up now just like Inky (saying Liverpool is owned by the US government wtf )
Show me where you find Standard Chartered involved in money laundering for Saudi terrorism..
You’ll find Standard Chartered pulled out of a Saudi event due to human rights abuses.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-45876239
What you make up due to your blind eye is up to you.
posted on 27/11/18
https://amp.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/20/standard-chartered-fined-300m-money-laundering-compliance
Not made up
And you don’t know about your clubs partnership withy he Chinese water company that’s commiting human rights abuses in tibet.
Your own clubs official water partnership?
Easy to look the other way for you it seems.
posted on 27/11/18
so not laundering money for terrorism like you made up then, wow you're wrong a lot.
as for tibet water, what can the fans do.. oh yeah we can join a protest and we did, guess before which game..
yup..
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42655418
so showing you how its done when its time to call your despot owner to account.
posted on 27/11/18
Your defacto owners, the UAE, can bang up a guy for life on false charges via a confession he didnt understand without access to a lawyer.
Not a peep out of city fans except to draw conclusions about the guys actions.
Whats the matter? afraid of getting your hands chopped off?
Page 14 of 53
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19