comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
Someone who thinks 'math' is acceptable on an English website is a bit odd or semi literate and only a pedant would argue over less than 5% but I see one did.
Foolish child.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained, i was pulling the guy up on his statement that Kane & Son score half our goals. This is wrong. It is position that implies we rely on these guys to score all our goals, when actually we rely on them as much as most other teams rely on their main strikers.
We also have Alli (6), Eriksen (4), Lucas (6), Lamela (4) also providing goals.
In fact Liverpool have Salah (16) and Firmono (9) scoring 25 of their 54 goals. That's a greater proportion (46.3%) than Kane & Son (45.8%).
Aubameyang & Lacazette also have 22 of Arsenals 48 goals.
Kinda wish the be||end had made an article about the non-story that Spurs rely on our best 2 strikers, just like Liverpool and Arsenal do. It would have been fascinating
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 29 minutes ago
Someone who thinks 'math' is acceptable on an English website is a bit odd or semi literate and only a pedant would argue over less than 5% but I see one did.
Foolish child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
bomdia having a shocker here! Making less and less sense with every post.
Hoody and bomdia
Hope this helps. Good luck:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/maths.shtml
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 3 minutes ago
Hoody and bomdia
Hope this helps. Good luck:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/maths.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up Dev. You’ve made your point.
And Alli is out too so that takes the percentage over 50 pc
Silly cild. If you have a PhD in a numerate subject i am happy to learn from you. If not then take your pedantry elsewhere than the City board.
Am I safe in saying that Spurs have now lost half or over half of their goal scorers, with Ali is out?
We only deal in precise percentages on this article.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the analogies made by desperate people on 606
It's normally mortgages or used cars in relation to net spend, bollox like that, but payrise percentages is a new one.
Carry on
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the analogies made by desperate people on 606
It's normally mortgages or used cars in relation to net spend, bollox like that, but payrise percentages is a new one.
Carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes it easier for simpletons to understand
Yeah? You sound like a fvcking geek mate.
"Two players that are injured have scored half your goals"
"Actually I think you'll find that you're 4.6% out"
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 9 hours, 12 minutes ago
Yeah? You sound like a fvcking geek mate.
"Two players that are injured have scored half your goals"
"Actually I think you'll find that you're 4.6% out"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worse than that.
There’s something serious going wrong with his real life that he feels the need to bring a generalisation to within 5 decimal points, and argue the toss over it with internet strangers.
Woohoo, I think its Aspergers so I will leave it. Doesn't excuse the childish insults though but explains the detail focus at the expense of the big picture.
Sign in if you want to comment
Easy enough
Page 4 of 4
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
posted on 21/1/19
Someone who thinks 'math' is acceptable on an English website is a bit odd or semi literate and only a pedant would argue over less than 5% but I see one did.
Foolish child.
posted on 21/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained, i was pulling the guy up on his statement that Kane & Son score half our goals. This is wrong. It is position that implies we rely on these guys to score all our goals, when actually we rely on them as much as most other teams rely on their main strikers.
We also have Alli (6), Eriksen (4), Lucas (6), Lamela (4) also providing goals.
In fact Liverpool have Salah (16) and Firmono (9) scoring 25 of their 54 goals. That's a greater proportion (46.3%) than Kane & Son (45.8%).
Aubameyang & Lacazette also have 22 of Arsenals 48 goals.
Kinda wish the be||end had made an article about the non-story that Spurs rely on our best 2 strikers, just like Liverpool and Arsenal do. It would have been fascinating
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
posted on 21/1/19
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 29 minutes ago
Someone who thinks 'math' is acceptable on an English website is a bit odd or semi literate and only a pedant would argue over less than 5% but I see one did.
Foolish child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
bomdia having a shocker here! Making less and less sense with every post.
posted on 21/1/19
Hoody and bomdia
Hope this helps. Good luck:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/maths.shtml
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 3 minutes ago
Hoody and bomdia
Hope this helps. Good luck:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learning/subjects/maths.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up Dev. You’ve made your point.
And Alli is out too so that takes the percentage over 50 pc
posted on 21/1/19
Silly cild. If you have a PhD in a numerate subject i am happy to learn from you. If not then take your pedantry elsewhere than the City board.
posted on 21/1/19
Am I safe in saying that Spurs have now lost half or over half of their goal scorers, with Ali is out?
posted on 21/1/19
We only deal in precise percentages on this article.
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the analogies made by desperate people on 606
It's normally mortgages or used cars in relation to net spend, bollox like that, but payrise percentages is a new one.
Carry on
posted on 21/1/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a... (U6374)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think arguing over a differential of circa 2% is a tad pedantic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
another one who cannot do simple mathematics!
and for Chr!sts sake Hoody, you love an argument about such details, whether written or numerical
FYI the difference between 24/48 (50%) and 22/48(45.8333%) is 4.1666%But it still stands that Son & Kane have not scored half our goals, which was the statement made, and considered to be worthy of its own thread by the fool who made the claim.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what circa means.
Feel free to be utterly pedantic though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maths is black and white. You're either wrong or right. You said 2%, you probably meant 2 goals, but heyho, you've continued the 'debate'. 4.6% (rounding up) is actually 230% larger. So, you're pretty far out.
If your boss said you'll be getting a circa 4.6% pay rise and you got 2%, you'd probably consider he's stretching the bounds of 'circa'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love the analogies made by desperate people on 606
It's normally mortgages or used cars in relation to net spend, bollox like that, but payrise percentages is a new one.
Carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes it easier for simpletons to understand
posted on 21/1/19
Yeah? You sound like a fvcking geek mate.
"Two players that are injured have scored half your goals"
"Actually I think you'll find that you're 4.6% out"
posted on 22/1/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 9 hours, 12 minutes ago
Yeah? You sound like a fvcking geek mate.
"Two players that are injured have scored half your goals"
"Actually I think you'll find that you're 4.6% out"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worse than that.
There’s something serious going wrong with his real life that he feels the need to bring a generalisation to within 5 decimal points, and argue the toss over it with internet strangers.
posted on 22/1/19
Woohoo, I think its Aspergers so I will leave it. Doesn't excuse the childish insults though but explains the detail focus at the expense of the big picture.
Page 4 of 4