Whilst this has been great and all I'm gonna take my leave. My parting comment is that I completely understand people being annoyed by the diving, however he was pulled back in the box and that's a penalty.
In the last game there was basically nothing and he hit the deck. That's not a penalty. He should have been carded.
Adios
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 26 seconds ago
Whilst this has been great and all I'm gonna take my leave. My parting comment is that I completely understand people being annoyed by the diving, however he was pulled back in the box and that's a penalty.
In the last game there was basically nothing and he hit the deck. That's not a penalty. He should have been carded.
Adios
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you’re still wrong.
There is absolutely nothing in the laws that enables you to say for definite that it was a foul.
That’s a fact.
How you can’t see that given that you didn’t even know which law was relevant is frankly laughable.
Another brilliant example tonight.
Alderweireld on Hazard, TOOR... foul or no foul, what’s your opinion?
Or should I say, what’s the absolute definitive decision as per TOOR’s criteria?
Hi TOOR,
Just wondering if you’ve worked out yet how two referees can view the same incident, come to a different conclusion and yet neither be wrong?
Given it anymore thought?
I have some help for you - let me know if you need it.
Sign in if you want to comment
Time now for some serious questions
Page 6 of 6
6
posted on 23/1/19
Whilst this has been great and all I'm gonna take my leave. My parting comment is that I completely understand people being annoyed by the diving, however he was pulled back in the box and that's a penalty.
In the last game there was basically nothing and he hit the deck. That's not a penalty. He should have been carded.
Adios
posted on 23/1/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 26 seconds ago
Whilst this has been great and all I'm gonna take my leave. My parting comment is that I completely understand people being annoyed by the diving, however he was pulled back in the box and that's a penalty.
In the last game there was basically nothing and he hit the deck. That's not a penalty. He should have been carded.
Adios
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you’re still wrong.
There is absolutely nothing in the laws that enables you to say for definite that it was a foul.
That’s a fact.
How you can’t see that given that you didn’t even know which law was relevant is frankly laughable.
posted on 24/1/19
Another brilliant example tonight.
Alderweireld on Hazard, TOOR... foul or no foul, what’s your opinion?
Or should I say, what’s the absolute definitive decision as per TOOR’s criteria?
posted on 27/1/19
Hi TOOR,
Just wondering if you’ve worked out yet how two referees can view the same incident, come to a different conclusion and yet neither be wrong?
Given it anymore thought?
I have some help for you - let me know if you need it.
Page 6 of 6
6