or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 102 comments are related to an article called:

Brendan no1 target

Page 4 of 5

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 21 minutes ago
Fash-I believe the comment you’re thinking about was by Heed. Now, if you have anything to the contrary, instead of deflecting, why not take the chance to show everyone I’m wrong and post it.

If you don’t, then it’s obvious it’s because you can’t. You can throw about another deflecting comment with a smiley at the end, but here’s your chance. I’m more than happy to say I’m wrong. Are you?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hiya Fash - in case you missed this.

We both know you didn't though, don't we?


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Imagine finding something you've no been looking for.

I wisnae lookin thoughyou big loonball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to look for anything - I read that thread earlier! That's how I knew you'd made a roaring cvnt of it straight away - despite your attempts at wriggling out it now.

See what I mean about folk desperately trying to pin stuff on me?!

Could go on about obsessive and stalking, but that's not my bag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We're no buying it. You wouldn't have been so eager and you would have posted that long ago.

Instead you trudged through until you found it.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 58 seconds ago
POV it's your keenness that gets you

Like an overeager little pup. You fell into two holes one after the other, chasing the non existent stick and following that up by making a dog's dinner of your other point too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fash - you're really not that clever.

But we know you won't admit to making a baws of it. Same as the other times.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
POV it's your keenness that gets you

Like an overeager little pup. You fell into two holes one after the other, chasing the non existent stick and following that up by making a dog's dinner of your other point too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not just any pup mind.

One of those wee handbag dogs with a diamante collar and a wee green and white bow in his hair.


comment by U*** (U21919)

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
os - no idea why it's an issue. I merely listed the top 3 scorers (Cosgrove has scored more than Edouard) so included him in it.

I think you're trying to find something that really isn't there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tried to make a point that Edouard could be a better striker on the basis of his Goals to min ratio..... that point was quickly made a mockery of however.

You would argue grass is blue man honestly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At no point did I make that argument.

I merely replied to Laudrup, who clearly thought that Morelos had the best goals to min ratio in the league.

I guess that's what happens when you look for something that really isn't there. Probably why folk end up desperately trying to prove stuff about my comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok sorry you added on the stat to try and back up another poster who was making the point to Laudrup that Edouard may be better due to Goals per min ratio. Lilke I said as soon as defoe came up your realised that the stats you put up mean nothing in the argument.

posted on 5/3/19

Fash - there was 1 minute between your comment and my reply about that.

We both know who had a stinker on that one.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
os - no idea why it's an issue. I merely listed the top 3 scorers (Cosgrove has scored more than Edouard) so included him in it.

I think you're trying to find something that really isn't there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tried to make a point that Edouard could be a better striker on the basis of his Goals to min ratio..... that point was quickly made a mockery of however.

You would argue grass is blue man honestly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At no point did I make that argument.

I merely replied to Laudrup, who clearly thought that Morelos had the best goals to min ratio in the league.

I guess that's what happens when you look for something that really isn't there. Probably why folk end up desperately trying to prove stuff about my comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok sorry you added on the stat to try and back up another poster who was making the point to Laudrup that Edouard may be better due to Goals per min ratio. Lilke I said as soon as defoe came up your realised that the stats you put up mean nothing in the argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really didn't. I only posted the stat because I knew Laudrup was wrong. At no point did I say or suggest anything about who was better. Sorry - but I am that petty.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
os - no idea why it's an issue. I merely listed the top 3 scorers (Cosgrove has scored more than Edouard) so included him in it.

I think you're trying to find something that really isn't there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tried to make a point that Edouard could be a better striker on the basis of his Goals to min ratio..... that point was quickly made a mockery of however.

You would argue grass is blue man honestly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At no point did I make that argument.

I merely replied to Laudrup, who clearly thought that Morelos had the best goals to min ratio in the league.

I guess that's what happens when you look for something that really isn't there. Probably why folk end up desperately trying to prove stuff about my comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok sorry you added on the stat to try and back up another poster who was making the point to Laudrup that Edouard may be better due to Goals per min ratio. Lilke I said as soon as defoe came up your realised that the stats you put up mean nothing in the argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe I made the point , and they do mean something ..it's just not what you want to see

Defoes goals to mins stats may suit the bill , but not in other areas he doesn't ...so that's unfortunate

Morelos or Edouard ??? I think we can all guess which of the two each poster would pick

Fwiw I can't see Brendan Rodgers being interested in either for Leicester





comment by U*** (U21919)

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
os - no idea why it's an issue. I merely listed the top 3 scorers (Cosgrove has scored more than Edouard) so included him in it.

I think you're trying to find something that really isn't there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tried to make a point that Edouard could be a better striker on the basis of his Goals to min ratio..... that point was quickly made a mockery of however.

You would argue grass is blue man honestly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At no point did I make that argument.

I merely replied to Laudrup, who clearly thought that Morelos had the best goals to min ratio in the league.

I guess that's what happens when you look for something that really isn't there. Probably why folk end up desperately trying to prove stuff about my comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok sorry you added on the stat to try and back up another poster who was making the point to Laudrup that Edouard may be better due to Goals per min ratio. Lilke I said as soon as defoe came up your realised that the stats you put up mean nothing in the argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really didn't. I only posted the stat because I knew Laudrup was wrong. At no point did I say or suggest anything about who was better. Sorry - but I am that petty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Laudrup didnt say anyone was top of the goal to min table ...... the only point he made was laughing at the goal to min ration table.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 58 seconds ago
POV it's your keenness that gets you

Like an overeager little pup. You fell into two holes one after the other, chasing the non existent stick and following that up by making a dog's dinner of your other point too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fash - you're really not that clever.

But we know you won't admit to making a baws of it. Same as the other times.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The red neck

posted on 5/3/19

Not how I read his comments os. He had made on prior to that.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 58 seconds ago
POV it's your keenness that gets you

Like an overeager little pup. You fell into two holes one after the other, chasing the non existent stick and following that up by making a dog's dinner of your other point too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fash - you're really not that clever.

But we know you won't admit to making a baws of it. Same as the other times.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The red neck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pity there's not an award for the most ironic comment of the year. That's a winner right there.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 6 seconds ago
Not how I read his comments os. He had made on prior to that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You questioned why Defoe was brought into a debate about Morelos and Edouard having already brought Cosgrove into it.

That sums you up. Daft as brush but twice as schitty.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 6 seconds ago
Not how I read his comments os. He had made on prior to that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You questioned why Defoe was brought into a debate about Morelos and Edouard having already brought Cosgrove into it.

That sums you up. Daft as brush but twice as schitty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And big enough to say if I get something wrong. In this case, if that's not what Laudrup was meaning then I got it wrong.

Not all of us can say that, can we Fash?!


posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Laudrup: have you seen the typo police? (U12366)
posted 42 seconds ago
Who is at the top of the ratio league at the moment 😁 Love keeping track of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Edouard with a goal every 103 mins.

Then Cosgrove with a goal every 114 mins.

Then Morelos with a goal every 118 mins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems laudrup was asking ...

What he meant ..who knows?!?

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 6 seconds ago
Not how I read his comments os. He had made on prior to that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You questioned why Defoe was brought into a debate about Morelos and Edouard having already brought Cosgrove into it.

That sums you up. Daft as brush but twice as schitty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And big enough to say if I get something wrong. In this case, if that's not what Laudrup was meaning then I got it wrong.

Not all of us can say that, can we Fash?!



----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll join you.


You got it wrong

posted on 5/3/19

comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Laudrup: have you seen the typo police? (U12366)
posted 42 seconds ago
Who is at the top of the ratio league at the moment 😁 Love keeping track of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Edouard with a goal every 103 mins.

Then Cosgrove with a goal every 114 mins.

Then Morelos with a goal every 118 mins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems laudrup was asking ...

What he meant ..who knows?!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’d be unusual if he wasn’t having a pop.

posted on 5/3/19

Yeah I think he was suggesting either that no such chart exists
Or
That that chart is alot of shiete .

Either way ..meh

posted on 5/3/19

Feck me, the s3xual tension on this thread is incredible.....

comment by U*** (U21919)

posted on 5/3/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 35 minutes ago
Not how I read his comments os. He had made on prior to that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs sake just bite properly like u would with fash!! 😂 😂

I thought it was quite clear that Laudrup was mocking the goal/min stats.

posted on 5/3/19

comment by orange sherbet (U21919)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 35 minutes ago
Not how I read his comments os. He had made on prior to that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs sake just bite properly like u would with fash!! 😂 😂

I thought it was quite clear that Laudrup was mocking the goal/min stats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate-see when you make a roaring cvnt of something the same as Fash, then I’ll bite.

It’s Laudrup. It could mean anything. 😂😂

posted on 5/3/19

I'm waiting for the moment when they decide to stop fighting and bum each other. Angry hatey bumming though.

Seem an interview at work where he is asked if he could sign one player in Scotland who would it be.

Answer was Alfie

comment by Timmy (U14278)

posted on 5/3/19

Looks like rangers fans were right and Brendan is ready to pay upto 5m for him

posted on 5/3/19

This thread is a site killer.

Depressing reading

Makes me sad ☹️

posted on 6/3/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 6/3/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Page 4 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment