Yep... always reactive, never proactive.
There's no justification for starting 31 year old Pedro either, after the effort he put in against Kiev. Needed freshning up.
Flash
If the transfer ban is upheld then most definitely he has to stay for 1 simple reason we wouldn't get anyone better. If the ban is overturned or suspended then i agree that we should replace him.
Why does Loftus Cheek never get a proper chance? Clearly a very talented player, yet garbage like Jorginho, Kovacic and Barkley get far more game time.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Chelseamf™®© (U1677)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yep... always reactive, never proactive.
There's no justification for starting 31 year old Pedro either, after the effort he put in against Kiev. Needed freshning up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro started to gain some good form recently. Was replaced on 60th minute. Introduction of CHO didn’t change much. It required one moment of brilliance from Hazard to get us the draw.
comment by Everywhere you go always take Lamela with you. Mopo's #1 fan. (U7905)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why does Loftus Cheek never get a proper chance? Clearly a very talented player, yet garbage like Jorginho, Kovacic and Barkley get far more game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Injuries
Pedro played the full-match against Kiev
He's 31 and shouldn't have been starting today.
I love Pedro & RLC.RLC and CHO should be starting mist matches for Chelsea in my view.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I don’t blame Sarri for starting with Pedro, three days recovery it’s enough for a professional player.
I thought Jorginho should’ve been replaced sooner.
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 6 minutes ago
Loftus-Cheek is still being eased in from a on-going back injury.
What more could have Sarri done today?
He gets criticised for waiting too long to make subs. He brought both RLC and CHO on earlier.
He gets criticised for sticking to the same formation even when we're behind. He changed to a 4-2-4 for the last 20/15 minutes of the game.
Never known a manager of ours to be judged against such unfairly high standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dude, he's 6th. We've fired managers for finishing 2nd before. What do you mean unfairly high standards?
So who are you suggesting we replace Sarri with Whal ?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
What were our expectations at the start of the season? A title challenge?
------------------
Top 4. And look where we are.
I'm fed up with his bullshiiiit football as well.
Pedro has been the in-form player, he was always going to start today. Club has an awful lot of fitness data on the players, if he needed a rest, they’d know.
Just one of those days today, we’d been on a good run of form and Wolves are a very good side.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 21 seconds ago
Mourinho or Zidane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho
Have a day off Wahl. He's off to Madrid which is good news for us!
How come I didn’t think of Jose before . Btw Zidane would be an interesting choice Whal
Pedro has played a lot of football. Hudson-Odoi hasn't and is young.
Sarri decided to sub the latter in a far from ideal situation 1 down, why wasn't that done at 0-0?
Would Sarri have brought him on if it was still 0-0 at that point? Nope.
Why not start him if you think he can salvage a game, when your back is against the wall.
He was brought on 60th minute, plenty of time to change the game. Also, you’re making a lot of assumptions CMF.
He showed a lot of faith in CHO to come on and try and create something in a tight game - nothing wrong with that at all.
Sarri doesn’t bring CHO on, gets criticised.
Sarri does bring CHO on, gets criticised anyway.
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 4 minutes ago
And look where we are.
Potentially 1 point behind 3rd if we win our game in hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, if we win it. Our form in 2019 is poor, I don't know why anyone would expect us to get top 4 over an in form Man Utd team and a superior Tottenham team.
In a game, he should have started and Pedro shouldn't.
Sign in if you want to comment
I had some sympathy for Sarri at....
Page 1 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 10/3/19
Yep... always reactive, never proactive.
There's no justification for starting 31 year old Pedro either, after the effort he put in against Kiev. Needed freshning up.
posted on 10/3/19
Flash
If the transfer ban is upheld then most definitely he has to stay for 1 simple reason we wouldn't get anyone better. If the ban is overturned or suspended then i agree that we should replace him.
posted on 10/3/19
Why does Loftus Cheek never get a proper chance? Clearly a very talented player, yet garbage like Jorginho, Kovacic and Barkley get far more game time.
posted on 10/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/19
comment by Chelseamf™®© (U1677)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yep... always reactive, never proactive.
There's no justification for starting 31 year old Pedro either, after the effort he put in against Kiev. Needed freshning up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro started to gain some good form recently. Was replaced on 60th minute. Introduction of CHO didn’t change much. It required one moment of brilliance from Hazard to get us the draw.
posted on 10/3/19
comment by Everywhere you go always take Lamela with you. Mopo's #1 fan. (U7905)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why does Loftus Cheek never get a proper chance? Clearly a very talented player, yet garbage like Jorginho, Kovacic and Barkley get far more game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Injuries
posted on 10/3/19
Pedro played the full-match against Kiev
posted on 10/3/19
He's 31 and shouldn't have been starting today.
posted on 10/3/19
I love Pedro & RLC.RLC and CHO should be starting mist matches for Chelsea in my view.
posted on 10/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/19
I don’t blame Sarri for starting with Pedro, three days recovery it’s enough for a professional player.
I thought Jorginho should’ve been replaced sooner.
posted on 10/3/19
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 6 minutes ago
Loftus-Cheek is still being eased in from a on-going back injury.
What more could have Sarri done today?
He gets criticised for waiting too long to make subs. He brought both RLC and CHO on earlier.
He gets criticised for sticking to the same formation even when we're behind. He changed to a 4-2-4 for the last 20/15 minutes of the game.
Never known a manager of ours to be judged against such unfairly high standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dude, he's 6th. We've fired managers for finishing 2nd before. What do you mean unfairly high standards?
posted on 10/3/19
So who are you suggesting we replace Sarri with Whal ?
posted on 10/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/19
Mourinho or Zidane.
posted on 10/3/19
What were our expectations at the start of the season? A title challenge?
------------------
Top 4. And look where we are.
I'm fed up with his bullshiiiit football as well.
posted on 10/3/19
Pedro has been the in-form player, he was always going to start today. Club has an awful lot of fitness data on the players, if he needed a rest, they’d know.
Just one of those days today, we’d been on a good run of form and Wolves are a very good side.
posted on 10/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/19
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 21 seconds ago
Mourinho or Zidane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho
Have a day off Wahl. He's off to Madrid which is good news for us!
posted on 10/3/19
How come I didn’t think of Jose before . Btw Zidane would be an interesting choice Whal
posted on 10/3/19
Pedro has played a lot of football. Hudson-Odoi hasn't and is young.
Sarri decided to sub the latter in a far from ideal situation 1 down, why wasn't that done at 0-0?
Would Sarri have brought him on if it was still 0-0 at that point? Nope.
Why not start him if you think he can salvage a game, when your back is against the wall.
posted on 10/3/19
He was brought on 60th minute, plenty of time to change the game. Also, you’re making a lot of assumptions CMF.
posted on 10/3/19
He showed a lot of faith in CHO to come on and try and create something in a tight game - nothing wrong with that at all.
Sarri doesn’t bring CHO on, gets criticised.
Sarri does bring CHO on, gets criticised anyway.
posted on 10/3/19
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 4 minutes ago
And look where we are.
Potentially 1 point behind 3rd if we win our game in hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, if we win it. Our form in 2019 is poor, I don't know why anyone would expect us to get top 4 over an in form Man Utd team and a superior Tottenham team.
posted on 10/3/19
In a game, he should have started and Pedro shouldn't.
Page 1 of 8
6 | 7 | 8