comment by Steve72 (U12846)
posted 8 minutes ago
The cheating is not being disputed, just the severity of it.

Is that the general overview of the 'revelations' today?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The cheating is not disputed because it was proven that the use of EBTs was not illegal. Nothing dishonest about the use of them.

What about Leeds

comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 58 seconds ago
Who owns the Oldco? Whoever it is could be in for a hefty payday.


Wit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think of the damages they could claim against HMRC.

This will run and run and i bet HMRC end up paying out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you on crack?

You still owe over £40 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alright dafty and you can't see how a solicitor would be able to prove the additional tax bill that was levied on the company that didn't actually exist played a part in its downfall

That should be a piece of pash for any solicitor worth his salt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your honour the extra £50 million valuation of the tax bill put us in the ground.

Ok, pay up what is owed then.

How much is that?

Eh, 40 million +

We withdraw our motion.

Had rangers paid £50 million for nothing you’d have a point, ultimately you’re pashing in the wind.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lost revenue, potential CL income, SPL income, player sales they lost out on, none of which needed to happen.

If a solicitor can prove the business would have been viable with the 20m tax bill as opposed to the 70m which seems like a pretty easy task then HMRC are going to be liable for some serious damages.

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 58 seconds ago
Who owns the Oldco? Whoever it is could be in for a hefty payday.


Wit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think of the damages they could claim against HMRC.

This will run and run and i bet HMRC end up paying out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you on crack?

You still owe over £40 million
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alright dafty and you can't see how a solicitor would be able to prove the additional tax bill that was levied on the company that didn't actually exist played a part in its downfall

That should be a piece of pash for any solicitor worth his salt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your honour the extra £50 million valuation of the tax bill put us in the ground.

Ok, pay up what is owed then.

How much is that?

Eh, 40 million +

We withdraw our motion.

Had rangers paid £50 million for nothing you’d have a point, ultimately you’re pashing in the wind.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lost revenue, potential CL income, SPL income, player sales they lost out on, none of which needed to happen.

If a solicitor can prove the business would have been viable with the 20m tax bill as opposed to the 70m which seems like a pretty easy task then HMRC are going to be liable for some serious damages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuckoo

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Can't even dispute it. Thought so

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't even dispute it. Thought so
----------------------------------------------------------------------


You actually genuinely believe what you’ve wrote don’t you?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Twitter is amazing right now for moon howling

One moonhowler has stated "I would love to know the religion of the tax officials who made the decision"

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

This is ideal during the international break to be fair

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Hope whoever made the 'mistake' is out of a job.

For me, as I understand it, this won’t affect anyone except the creditors of the old COMPANY, Dave King may benefit to a small degree as he was a shareholder, my understanding is BDO now have enough funds to settle any outstanding debts owed by the Ild COMPANY, I may be wrong don’t all go crazy, however I do suggest that £50m less of a tax bill would have made the situation a lot different and would most likely have never resulted in Whyte being involved and there after all the other Events that happened

comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 58 seconds ago
For me, as I understand it, this won’t affect anyone except the creditors of the old COMPANY, Dave King may benefit to a small degree as he was a shareholder, my understanding is BDO now have enough funds to settle any outstanding debts owed by the Ild COMPANY, I may be wrong don’t all go crazy, however I do suggest that £50m less of a tax bill would have made the situation a lot different and would most likely have never resulted in Whyte being involved and there after all the other Events that happened
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s not to say someone else wouldn’t have come in and done the exact same as Whyte did either.

comment by Bluenose_Ricksen - No. 2 (U6456)
posted 1 minute ago
Hope whoever made the 'mistake' is out of a job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
doubtful

comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 58 seconds ago
For me, as I understand it, this won’t affect anyone except the creditors of the old COMPANY, Dave King may benefit to a small degree as he was a shareholder, my understanding is BDO now have enough funds to settle any outstanding debts owed by the Ild COMPANY, I may be wrong don’t all go crazy, however I do suggest that £50m less of a tax bill would have made the situation a lot different and would most likely have never resulted in Whyte being involved and there after all the other Events that happened
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s not to say someone else wouldn’t have come in and done the exact same as Whyte did either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not, but its also not to say that someone may have came in and pumped in a lot of money

Comment deleted by Site Moderator