*abusive Trll

comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
Trll
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Said without a hint of irony.

Smileys. Great.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Goals on Sunday just said a was clear foul, and that’s from 2 strikers as well.

Good to see VAR doing its job.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 6 minutes ago
Goals on Sunday just said a was clear foul, and that’s from 2 strikers as well.

Good to see VAR doing its job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh that must mean it’s a fact and not opinion then.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 6 minutes ago
Goals on Sunday just said a was clear foul, and that’s from 2 strikers as well.

Good to see VAR doing its job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh that must mean it’s a fact and not opinion then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you’re finally getting it , well done.

Even Hodgson said it was a foul.

Two hands push in the back is a foul, its not a matter of opinion. Not all fouls are.

comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 6 minutes ago
Everything is an opinion seemingly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I mean if certain types of fouls come down to opinion of course that means everything is.

comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
Even Hodgson said it was a foul.

Two hands push in the back is a foul, its not a matter of opinion. Not all fouls are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is a matter of opinion.

comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 6 minutes ago
Goals on Sunday just said a was clear foul, and that’s from 2 strikers as well.

Good to see VAR doing its job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh that must mean it’s a fact and not opinion then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you’re finally getting it , well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh, thanks mate.

In future I’ll turn on goals of Sunday to determine the absolute correct decision beyond doubt.

It was a very biased decision, not one a forward would get a penalty for ,and certainly one which will be constantly referred to as being like the Lovren one v Palace in future,when it doesn't get a goal chalked off, or a penalty, for other teams
TAA pushes players in the back all the time and gets away with it

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
It doesn't matter how he went down.

We can't or shouldn't allow blatant pushing and use of the hands in the game IMO.

If a player is beaten they are beaten and perhaps we will see more goals at set pieces, if only VAR could be effectively implemented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It absolutely matters how he went down, because arguably he’s exaggerating the contact and influencing the official’s decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which doesnt change the fact that he was pushed in the back. VAR check, confirmed pushed, goal ruled out. Job done, everybody happy, apart from bitter people. We move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s a matter of opinion whether it was a foul.

Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. Then we'll agree to disagree.

The problem people have isn’t it was deemed a foul, it’s the inconsistency in the use of VAR. If they’re judging that to be a clear and obvious error, it doesn’t make sense they didn’t do it for others. They can hide behind subjectivity, but then I don’t see how that’s compatible with “clear and obvious”.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 6 minutes ago
Goals on Sunday just said a was clear foul, and that’s from 2 strikers as well.

Good to see VAR doing its job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh that must mean it’s a fact and not opinion then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you’re finally getting it , well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh, thanks mate.

In future I’ll turn on goals of Sunday to determine the absolute correct decision beyond doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone has an opinion, no doubt.
But the weight of opinion, amongst pretty much every commentator, pundit, referee, VAR, even the opposition's manger, agree it was a foul.
If it were not Liverpool, and we were not currently clear at the top of the table, doubt it would even be up for discussion.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks 100k Baby (U6283)
posted 6 minutes ago
Goals on Sunday just said a was clear foul, and that’s from 2 strikers as well.

Good to see VAR doing its job.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh that must mean it’s a fact and not opinion then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you’re finally getting it , well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh, thanks mate.

In future I’ll turn on goals of Sunday to determine the absolute correct decision beyond doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it’s certainly better than the utter tripe you’ve been posting on this thread, but as you’ve said over and over again that’s just my opinion

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 13 minutes ago
The problem people have isn’t it was deemed a foul, it’s the inconsistency in the use of VAR. If they’re judging that to be a clear and obvious error, it doesn’t make sense they didn’t do it for others. They can hide behind subjectivity, but then I don’t see how that’s compatible with “clear and obvious”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why isn't it compatible? What determines clear and obvious? Did the referee miss a push? Did the VAR point out that he missed a push? If both of the answers are yes then VAR has worked on this occasion so I'm not sure what the issue is. I can only conclude it is because of the team who got the benefit of the correct decision. Bitter people.

comment by somethingelse (U3109)
posted 30 minutes ago


It was a very biased decision, not one a forward would get a penalty for
------

comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 13 minutes ago
The problem people have isn’t it was deemed a foul, it’s the inconsistency in the use of VAR. If they’re judging that to be a clear and obvious error, it doesn’t make sense they didn’t do it for others. They can hide behind subjectivity, but then I don’t see how that’s compatible with “clear and obvious”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why isn't it compatible? What determines clear and obvious? Did the referee miss a push? Did the VAR point out that he missed a push? If both of the answers are yes then VAR has worked on this occasion so I'm not sure what the issue is. I can only conclude it is because of the team who got the benefit of the correct decision. Bitter people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That it hasn’t on other occasions, like Hodgson said. I think you’ve misunderstood my point.

They need to find a way to introduce more uniformity in the decisions.

The push on Sterling at Anfield want deemed a foul, what’s the difference?

Or is the answer too obvious