Is it fair to exclude someone just because they express a different point of view?
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 4 minutes ago
It is if they’re a c-nt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to ban all of the cuuunts on here, there won't be many posters left.
That’s true, but there’s cuuuuunts and then there’s RDD level cuuuntery.
It's not so much his articles that are a problem. But I cannot understand for the lifeof me why he doesn't just choose a name, and stick with it.
Also to admit he used to be RDD, when we all know he was.
Nothing wrong in having different opinions though.
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 minutes ago
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100% this... I finally hit the filter button for the first time
Just can't be bothered
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 13 minutes ago
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly this.
This Big Mctominay incarnation seems to be sticking around for longer than usual. Mass filtering wouldn't be a bad idea at this point.
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
Quite a few times it has been a discussion about immigration policy and community relations that has been his downfall. That's the one area where he does seem to hold some quite consistent and heartfelt (if contentious) opinions.
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 28 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea fans are a lot quicker on the complaint button than us.
It's not so much his articles that are a problem. But I cannot understand for the lifeof me why he doesn't just choose a name, and stick with it.
------------------
He wouldn't get as much attention that way.
It’s probably United fans complaining about Wahl.
Maf is a stain on this site, but he never gets an outright ban, and no way this RDD character is at those levels of cuunterry
I didn’t realise the idiot is still around.
This new idiot Tecnodrome, Nobb or Hippo?
Mass filter for suggesting Ed isnt as bad as has been made out and that Ole isnt good enough.
What a joke. Especially considering the behaviour of so many on here.
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because iv done nothing wrong and encourage debate / conversation.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
It's not so much his articles that are a problem. But I cannot understand for the lifeof me why he doesn't just choose a name, and stick with it.
------------------
He wouldn't get as much attention that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not me posting about Rdd every 5 mins
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 minutes ago
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100% this... I finally hit the filter button for the first time
Just can't be bothered
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh no. What will i do without your insightful comments such as telling me to die.
comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because iv done nothing wrong and encourage debate / conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand why you don't just name your account RDD (or a variant of it each time).
You don't fool anyone every time you make a new account.
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because iv done nothing wrong and encourage debate / conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand why you don't just name your account RDD (or a variant of it each time).
You don't fool anyone every time you make a new account.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. It's a great question.
Here is another. Why does it bother you ?
Why does it bother you ?
--------------
It doesn't bother me, just making a comment kid.
Well you have tried to understand it, which you really dont need to. Kid
You would be a better poster for it. As Red Russian said, you are not debating in good faith.
Sign in if you want to comment
RDD in
Page 1 of 3
posted on 2/12/19
Is it fair to exclude someone just because they express a different point of view?
posted on 2/12/19
It is if they’re a c-nt.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 4 minutes ago
It is if they’re a c-nt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to ban all of the cuuunts on here, there won't be many posters left.
posted on 2/12/19
That’s true, but there’s cuuuuunts and then there’s RDD level cuuuntery.
posted on 2/12/19
It's not so much his articles that are a problem. But I cannot understand for the lifeof me why he doesn't just choose a name, and stick with it.
Also to admit he used to be RDD, when we all know he was.
Nothing wrong in having different opinions though.
posted on 2/12/19
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 minutes ago
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100% this... I finally hit the filter button for the first time
Just can't be bothered
posted on 2/12/19
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 13 minutes ago
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly this.
This Big Mctominay incarnation seems to be sticking around for longer than usual. Mass filtering wouldn't be a bad idea at this point.
posted on 2/12/19
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
posted on 2/12/19
Quite a few times it has been a discussion about immigration policy and community relations that has been his downfall. That's the one area where he does seem to hold some quite consistent and heartfelt (if contentious) opinions.
posted on 2/12/19
And Ed Woodward.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 28 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea fans are a lot quicker on the complaint button than us.
posted on 2/12/19
It's not so much his articles that are a problem. But I cannot understand for the lifeof me why he doesn't just choose a name, and stick with it.
------------------
He wouldn't get as much attention that way.
posted on 2/12/19
It’s probably United fans complaining about Wahl.
posted on 2/12/19
Maf is a stain on this site, but he never gets an outright ban, and no way this RDD character is at those levels of cuunterry
posted on 2/12/19
I didn’t realise the idiot is still around.
This new idiot Tecnodrome, Nobb or Hippo?
posted on 2/12/19
Mass filter for suggesting Ed isnt as bad as has been made out and that Ole isnt good enough.
What a joke. Especially considering the behaviour of so many on here.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because iv done nothing wrong and encourage debate / conversation.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
It's not so much his articles that are a problem. But I cannot understand for the lifeof me why he doesn't just choose a name, and stick with it.
------------------
He wouldn't get as much attention that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not me posting about Rdd every 5 mins
posted on 2/12/19
comment by Shugs (U14253)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 minutes ago
Changing name is part of his tiresome shtick. He has frequently returned and under his new identity adopted an opinion wholly at odds with the one he fervently argued before he was banned. It's hard to tolerate someone who doesn't argue in good faith, whether you agree with them or not. His purpose isn't to debate things, but to derail discussions and annoy people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100% this... I finally hit the filter button for the first time
Just can't be bothered
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh no. What will i do without your insightful comments such as telling me to die.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because iv done nothing wrong and encourage debate / conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand why you don't just name your account RDD (or a variant of it each time).
You don't fool anyone every time you make a new account.
posted on 2/12/19
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
I don’t know why admin lets him stay for as long as he does. Especially when he bans Wahl straight away. At least Wahl is funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because iv done nothing wrong and encourage debate / conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand why you don't just name your account RDD (or a variant of it each time).
You don't fool anyone every time you make a new account.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. It's a great question.
Here is another. Why does it bother you ?
posted on 2/12/19
Why does it bother you ?
--------------
It doesn't bother me, just making a comment kid.
posted on 2/12/19
Well you have tried to understand it, which you really dont need to. Kid
posted on 2/12/19
You would be a better poster for it. As Red Russian said, you are not debating in good faith.
Page 1 of 3