Thanks Manusince52, a sensible humanitarian response, do you agree with this stance OP?
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
It’s the lead story in most papers globally, how is that a little deal?
This will now be fully investigated, not just internally by Iran.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.
Today’s admission by Iran confirms what it always looked like: Someone in their military confused this flight (delayed by an hour) for an enemy aircraft and launched missiles at it. No need for military repercussions and it’s right that Iran “own” it.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
They should be made to pay for it by the condemnation of other countries, the international Court, and paying récompense to the families of the victims.
As should be the case in all similar incidents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely.
honestly can’t believe how little a deal is being made of this.
176 innocent civilians have lost their lives over a botched missile strike and all I hear the world leaders saying is what a terrible accident it was.
If the Iranian military are capable of accidentally murdering their own citizens, then how can we trust them with nuclear weapons?
This was an act of war for me and they should pay for it...
Same way America shot down a civilian plane in 1988.
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 minute ago
Was it 100% Iran’s fault with conclusive evidence? Or are we going on the word of the US?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've admitted it
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 6 minutes ago
They should be made to pay for it by the condemnation of other countries, the international Court, and paying récompense to the families of the victims.
As should be the case in all similar incidents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. But no more civilians should have to die
What I don’t understand is why Iran didn’t check to clear their airspace before launching those missiles, it’s common sense of a 5 year old for goodness sake.
But I don’t know what more can be done to punish that country, they’ve been hit by every single sanction under the sun that you can think of.
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I would have ran out on to the street, bottle of whiskey in one hand and pistol in the other, shooting to the heavens and praising Jeebus for killing the evil sand people
comment by Chelsea1 (U22265)
posted 5 minutes ago
honestly can’t believe how little a deal is being made of this.
176 innocent civilians have lost their lives over a botched missile strike and all I hear the world leaders saying is what a terrible accident it was.
If the Iranian military are capable of accidentally murdering their own citizens, then how can we trust them with nuclear weapons?
This was an act of war for me and they should pay for it...
Same way America shot down a civilian plane in 1988.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 years before you were born by the sounds of things
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the op said about Iran, so let's see if he's consistent with anyone who does similar.
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Chelsea1 (U22265)
posted 5 minutes ago
honestly can’t believe how little a deal is being made of this.
176 innocent civilians have lost their lives over a botched missile strike and all I hear the world leaders saying is what a terrible accident it was.
If the Iranian military are capable of accidentally murdering their own citizens, then how can we trust them with nuclear weapons?
This was an act of war for me and they should pay for it...
Same way America shot down a civilian plane in 1988.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 years before you were born by the sounds of things
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if Iran can’t have nuclear weapons because of shooting a plane. Someone take America’s off them. They did the same...
Already said on a previous thread that no country should have Nuclear weapons. Stop trying to make this about America.
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I would have ran out on to the street, bottle of whiskey in one hand and pistol in the other, shooting to the heavens and praising Jeebus for killing the evil sand people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You probably would.
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the op said about Iran, so let's see if he's consistent with anyone who does similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know he won't be. They went people call this out he will accuse them of taking Iran's side and refusing to condemn.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the op said about Iran, so let's see if he's consistent with anyone who does similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know he won't be. They went people call this out he will accuse them of taking Iran's side and refusing to condemn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*then when people call this out
No idea what my autocorrect is doing there.
The us accidentally gunned down British soldiers during the Iraq war. Shiiit happens when you are war mongering caaants.
It sounds to me like I could go out and shoot up a school or something and then be excused for it because it happens in America all the time. Some people
Comment deleted by Article Creator
It's an election year in America and Trump isn't exactly doing well there atm , impeachment and all ...
So of course he was always going to start some military conflict somewhere , you know , to "keep America safe" and win the election
comment by comic book guy (U17816)
posted 15 seconds ago
It's an election year in America and Trump isn't exactly doing well there atm , impeachment and all ...
So of course he was always going to start some military conflict somewhere , you know , to "keep America safe" and win the election
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t argue with that but again it’s not relevant to what Iran have done
Also OP, killing your own citizens would be genocide, not an act of war.
What about the Canadians and Britons on board among other foreign nationals?
Sign in if you want to comment
How can you accidentally shoot down a plane
Page 2 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 11/1/20
Thanks Manusince52, a sensible humanitarian response, do you agree with this stance OP?
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
posted on 11/1/20
It’s the lead story in most papers globally, how is that a little deal?
This will now be fully investigated, not just internally by Iran.
posted on 11/1/20
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.
Today’s admission by Iran confirms what it always looked like: Someone in their military confused this flight (delayed by an hour) for an enemy aircraft and launched missiles at it. No need for military repercussions and it’s right that Iran “own” it.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
They should be made to pay for it by the condemnation of other countries, the international Court, and paying récompense to the families of the victims.
As should be the case in all similar incidents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely.
posted on 11/1/20
honestly can’t believe how little a deal is being made of this.
176 innocent civilians have lost their lives over a botched missile strike and all I hear the world leaders saying is what a terrible accident it was.
If the Iranian military are capable of accidentally murdering their own citizens, then how can we trust them with nuclear weapons?
This was an act of war for me and they should pay for it...
Same way America shot down a civilian plane in 1988.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
posted on 11/1/20
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 1 minute ago
Was it 100% Iran’s fault with conclusive evidence? Or are we going on the word of the US?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've admitted it
posted on 11/1/20
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 6 minutes ago
They should be made to pay for it by the condemnation of other countries, the international Court, and paying récompense to the families of the victims.
As should be the case in all similar incidents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. But no more civilians should have to die
posted on 11/1/20
What I don’t understand is why Iran didn’t check to clear their airspace before launching those missiles, it’s common sense of a 5 year old for goodness sake.
But I don’t know what more can be done to punish that country, they’ve been hit by every single sanction under the sun that you can think of.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I would have ran out on to the street, bottle of whiskey in one hand and pistol in the other, shooting to the heavens and praising Jeebus for killing the evil sand people
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Chelsea1 (U22265)
posted 5 minutes ago
honestly can’t believe how little a deal is being made of this.
176 innocent civilians have lost their lives over a botched missile strike and all I hear the world leaders saying is what a terrible accident it was.
If the Iranian military are capable of accidentally murdering their own citizens, then how can we trust them with nuclear weapons?
This was an act of war for me and they should pay for it...
Same way America shot down a civilian plane in 1988.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 years before you were born by the sounds of things
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the op said about Iran, so let's see if he's consistent with anyone who does similar.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Chelsea1 (U22265)
posted 5 minutes ago
honestly can’t believe how little a deal is being made of this.
176 innocent civilians have lost their lives over a botched missile strike and all I hear the world leaders saying is what a terrible accident it was.
If the Iranian military are capable of accidentally murdering their own citizens, then how can we trust them with nuclear weapons?
This was an act of war for me and they should pay for it...
Same way America shot down a civilian plane in 1988.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 years before you were born by the sounds of things
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if Iran can’t have nuclear weapons because of shooting a plane. Someone take America’s off them. They did the same...
posted on 11/1/20
Already said on a previous thread that no country should have Nuclear weapons. Stop trying to make this about America.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I would have ran out on to the street, bottle of whiskey in one hand and pistol in the other, shooting to the heavens and praising Jeebus for killing the evil sand people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You probably would.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the op said about Iran, so let's see if he's consistent with anyone who does similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know he won't be. They went people call this out he will accuse them of taking Iran's side and refusing to condemn.
posted on 11/1/20
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Techno (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Joe Goldberg (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
All I’m reading is “duhhhh well 30 years ago this happens so...”
No condemnation for what Iran have done whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been plenty of condemnation, just like there was for the previous instances. It's quite pathetic of you to pretend otherwise.
What is actually happening here, is that you want to take an extreme position and separate Iran and the US into 'goodies and baddies'. Then that way you can justify taking unprecedented actions for such an event and completely ignore previous responses.
Then when someone provides a bit of balance (something you definitely don't want), you accuse them of being at the other extreme to discredit their point in your own mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t a clue what you are talking about mate.
I have no love for the American regime and have been very vocal about that on here. If you can explain to me how a plane being shot down in 1988 is related to this topic in what you claim to be a balanced manner then please do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you have responded to that atrocity in a similar manner, say the US should pay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on what you mean by pay. Would you have said that it was an act of war and they shouldnt have nuclear weapons?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the op said about Iran, so let's see if he's consistent with anyone who does similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know he won't be. They went people call this out he will accuse them of taking Iran's side and refusing to condemn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*then when people call this out
No idea what my autocorrect is doing there.
posted on 11/1/20
The us accidentally gunned down British soldiers during the Iraq war. Shiiit happens when you are war mongering caaants.
posted on 11/1/20
It sounds to me like I could go out and shoot up a school or something and then be excused for it because it happens in America all the time. Some people
posted on 11/1/20
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 11/1/20
It's an election year in America and Trump isn't exactly doing well there atm , impeachment and all ...
So of course he was always going to start some military conflict somewhere , you know , to "keep America safe" and win the election
posted on 11/1/20
comment by comic book guy (U17816)
posted 15 seconds ago
It's an election year in America and Trump isn't exactly doing well there atm , impeachment and all ...
So of course he was always going to start some military conflict somewhere , you know , to "keep America safe" and win the election
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t argue with that but again it’s not relevant to what Iran have done
posted on 11/1/20
Also OP, killing your own citizens would be genocide, not an act of war.
posted on 11/1/20
What about the Canadians and Britons on board among other foreign nationals?
Page 2 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10