It was merely an unfortunate collision. Tanganga's foot wasn't even planted into the ground yet when Robertson swung his leg to get the ball.
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 minutes ago
Honestly, it is one of those things the more you try to justify it being not red, it looks like red!
https://ghanasoccernet.com/fans-think-robertson-should-have-been-sent-off-after-similar-tackle-as-aubas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Source seems legit
It was merely an unfortunate collision.
=====================
Like when you get hit by a double-decker, and then say it was merely a collision
Red card anytime you go into a high tackle with stud showing
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 minutes ago
Honestly, it is one of those things the more you try to justify it being not red, it looks like red!
https://ghanasoccernet.com/fans-think-robertson-should-have-been-sent-off-after-similar-tackle-as-aubas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Source seems legit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as legit as Liverpool's throw from which they scored
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 minute ago
It was merely an unfortunate collision.
=====================
Like when you get hit by a double-decker, and then say it was merely a collision
Red card anytime you go into a high tackle with stud showing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. The ball was there to be won and Robertson won it.
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
It was merely an unfortunate collision.
=====================
Like when you get hit by a double-decker, and then say it was merely a collision
Red card anytime you go into a high tackle with stud showing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn’t go into the tackle with studs showing.
There was no tackle.
He kicked the ball.
The Spurs defender was late on Robertson and somehow he gets away with it because he happened to arrive under Robertson's studs when the ball was gone. If he hits any other part of Robertson's body, he is booked. Due to it being studs, people consider a red card for Robertson, meaning the attention is off the player who came in late.
You people are nuts.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 51 seconds ago
The Spurs defender was late on Robertson and somehow he gets away with it because he happened to arrive under Robertson's studs when the ball was gone. If he hits any other part of Robertson's body, he is booked. Due to it being studs, people consider a red card for Robertson, meaning the attention is off the player who came in late.
You people are nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well put.
Sign in if you want to comment
The most inconsistent season ever?
Page 5 of 5
posted on 12/1/20
It was merely an unfortunate collision. Tanganga's foot wasn't even planted into the ground yet when Robertson swung his leg to get the ball.
posted on 12/1/20
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 minutes ago
Honestly, it is one of those things the more you try to justify it being not red, it looks like red!
https://ghanasoccernet.com/fans-think-robertson-should-have-been-sent-off-after-similar-tackle-as-aubas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Source seems legit
posted on 12/1/20
It was merely an unfortunate collision.
=====================
Like when you get hit by a double-decker, and then say it was merely a collision
Red card anytime you go into a high tackle with stud showing
posted on 12/1/20
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 minutes ago
Honestly, it is one of those things the more you try to justify it being not red, it looks like red!
https://ghanasoccernet.com/fans-think-robertson-should-have-been-sent-off-after-similar-tackle-as-aubas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Source seems legit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as legit as Liverpool's throw from which they scored
posted on 12/1/20
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 minute ago
It was merely an unfortunate collision.
=====================
Like when you get hit by a double-decker, and then say it was merely a collision
Red card anytime you go into a high tackle with stud showing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. The ball was there to be won and Robertson won it.
posted on 12/1/20
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
It was merely an unfortunate collision.
=====================
Like when you get hit by a double-decker, and then say it was merely a collision
Red card anytime you go into a high tackle with stud showing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn’t go into the tackle with studs showing.
There was no tackle.
He kicked the ball.
posted on 12/1/20
The Spurs defender was late on Robertson and somehow he gets away with it because he happened to arrive under Robertson's studs when the ball was gone. If he hits any other part of Robertson's body, he is booked. Due to it being studs, people consider a red card for Robertson, meaning the attention is off the player who came in late.
You people are nuts.
posted on 12/1/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 51 seconds ago
The Spurs defender was late on Robertson and somehow he gets away with it because he happened to arrive under Robertson's studs when the ball was gone. If he hits any other part of Robertson's body, he is booked. Due to it being studs, people consider a red card for Robertson, meaning the attention is off the player who came in late.
You people are nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well put.
Page 5 of 5