<You really are a pie - a dinosaur if you will.
Aye we need to stop the personal as you say.
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 18 minutes ago
Admin - I will say this - you will never get any new posters at this rate. 'Who were you' - 'You were so and so' - why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely thought you were. Didn't realise it was a new account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s not a new poster. He was Pedro72, then changed it to P72 when he realised he’d backed a total loser, then M72 before he was banned. He’s been on here several times under different guises, and banned every time.
The irony of him going on about internet hardmen, yet being too cowardly to admit to being on here before is off the scale.
It’s also ironic that he’s going on about the lack of new posters and how they’re treated, yet he comes on here and is nothing but abrasive to existing posters. I’ve only ever seen one poster have a go at TMQ. He’s one of the least offensive guys on here. Convivial and a man who gives a precious commodity to others-his time. That poster was the Pedro 72/P72/M72 guy.
Let’s see how it all pans out.
This article is a tough read
No question
<He’s one of the least offensive guys on here.>
Take that back ya kvnt
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 18 minutes ago
Admin - I will say this - you will never get any new posters at this rate. 'Who were you' - 'You were so and so' - why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely thought you were. Didn't realise it was a new account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s not a new poster. He was Pedro72, then changed it to P72 when he realised he’d backed a total loser, then M72 before he was banned. He’s been on here several times under different guises, and banned every time.
The irony of him going on about internet hardmen, yet being too cowardly to admit to being on here before is off the scale.
It’s also ironic that he’s going on about the lack of new posters and how they’re treated, yet he comes on here and is nothing but abrasive to existing posters. I’ve only ever seen one poster have a go at TMQ. He’s one of the least offensive guys on here. Convivial and a man who gives a precious commodity to others-his time. That poster was the Pedro 72/P72/M72 guy.
Let’s see how it all pans out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 4 minutes ago
<He’s one of the least offensive guys on here.>
Take that back ya kvnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn’t say that to my face though, would you?!? Fvcking old dinosaur.
Funny how it works out.
A' the fake death and double accounting posters are tims.
A' the 'new' posters who can name the 'gangs' & 'cliques' are Bears.
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 18 minutes ago
Admin - I will say this - you will never get any new posters at this rate. 'Who were you' - 'You were so and so' - why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely thought you were. Didn't realise it was a new account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s not a new poster. He was Pedro72, then changed it to P72 when he realised he’d backed a total loser, then M72 before he was banned. He’s been on here several times under different guises, and banned every time.
The irony of him going on about internet hardmen, yet being too cowardly to admit to being on here before is off the scale.
It’s also ironic that he’s going on about the lack of new posters and how they’re treated, yet he comes on here and is nothing but abrasive to existing posters. I’ve only ever seen one poster have a go at TMQ. He’s one of the least offensive guys on here. Convivial and a man who gives a precious commodity to others-his time. That poster was the Pedro 72/P72/M72 guy.
Let’s see how it all pans out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea who you are but hey-ho.
So have you read some of Quinn's posts which were slagging me in derogatory terms or have those been conveniently missed?
I did not initiate any derogatory language but I guess you have conveniently missed this?
Look - just say new Rangers poster = Bad. New Celtic poster = Good.
Don't you see why this site is not attracting new posters?
I really cannot stand this - why are new posters hounded off of here because they are not 'regulars'?
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
<Look at the state of you chaps.>
Says the 'newbie' who drops a Fritzel ref on a lightweight forum.
<sigh> I'll try but fail to be the Tim Elite Wolf.
Utter state of you ya kvnt.
Fvkin phanny
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lovely language for what the poster 'Lauders' called it for what it is - banter.
Yet you conveniently forget this exchange?
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
<have you read some of Quinn's posts which were slagging me in derogatory terms>
Starting to like you.
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha - oh - so not such a prolonged paragraph or 2 this time?
Rather telling.
A serious question - why do you feel the need to bully someone off of a forum?
Does it empower you to get one over on a Rangers poster?
Just let it go - whoever wins the league, wins - that is it.
<I'll try but fail to be the Tim Elite Wolf. Utter state of you ya kvnt. Fvkin phanny>
You do know I was parodying a Rangers fan on here?
Who uses such terms in a highly humourous vein?
You must know this.
You've clearly studied the forum for a long long time.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 minute ago
<I'll try but fail to be the Tim Elite Wolf. Utter state of you ya kvnt. Fvkin phanny>
You do know I was parodying a Rangers fan on here?
Who uses such terms in a highly humourous vein?
You must know this.
You've clearly studied the forum for a long long time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice back-track action.
Forget it. I can't be assed with people like you who try to bully people off of forums.
Starting to really like you now.
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha - oh - so not such a prolonged paragraph or 2 this time?
Rather telling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it?! You can tell something from that, but couldn’t understand obvious statements previously?!
No worries, coward.
Here’s the thing-we’ve all been new posters at some stage. But most of us have always had the same name and account number. There’s very, very few of us who’ve slated the site, been banned several times, yet keep coming back. And every time you come back, you slate the place!
Keep going. Your patter was the exact same last time. You were too cowardly to admit being on here before until admin banned you and confirmed you’d been on as a previous poster.
DC mate.
You just tell me who's being bad to you.
Now that you an me are buddies.
I'm the er .... hardman? on here.
I'll fix them mate - every kvnt on here is shyyte scared o me.
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha - oh - so not such a prolonged paragraph or 2 this time?
Rather telling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it?! You can tell something from that, but couldn’t understand obvious statements previously?!
No worries, coward.
Here’s the thing-we’ve all been new posters at some stage. But most of us have always had the same name and account number. There’s very, very few of us who’ve slated the site, been banned several times, yet keep coming back. And every time you come back, you slate the place!
Keep going. Your patter was the exact same last time. You were too cowardly to admit being on here before until admin banned you and confirmed you’d been on as a previous poster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea who you are but you seem to spend a lot of time trying to get people banned.
Sad life man.
I would think both Rangers and Celtic fans are rather underwhelmed with the cup showings
Only crumb of comfort would be Rangers included 7 not selected for the recent Glasgow derby
I assume Celtic were similar
Not much to be read into either game imo
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
I would think both Rangers and Celtic fans are rather underwhelmed with the cup showings
Only crumb of comfort would be Rangers included 7 not selected for the recent Glasgow derby
I assume Celtic were similar
Not much to be read into either game imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steady with the truth.
Listen mate.
Friendly advice.
You talking constantly 'bout getting folk banned.
Seems it kinda hangs heavy on ye.
As a mate - maybe you should cut this back?
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 24 seconds ago
Listen mate.
Friendly advice.
You talking constantly 'bout getting folk banned.
Seems it kinda hangs heavy on ye.
As a mate - maybe you should cut this back?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'Oh - ok, Boss - loud and clear'!
Must remember the rules.
Sign in if you want to comment
Post-Dubai Camps
Page 7 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 18/1/20
<You really are a pie - a dinosaur if you will.
Aye we need to stop the personal as you say.
posted on 18/1/20
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 18 minutes ago
Admin - I will say this - you will never get any new posters at this rate. 'Who were you' - 'You were so and so' - why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely thought you were. Didn't realise it was a new account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s not a new poster. He was Pedro72, then changed it to P72 when he realised he’d backed a total loser, then M72 before he was banned. He’s been on here several times under different guises, and banned every time.
The irony of him going on about internet hardmen, yet being too cowardly to admit to being on here before is off the scale.
It’s also ironic that he’s going on about the lack of new posters and how they’re treated, yet he comes on here and is nothing but abrasive to existing posters. I’ve only ever seen one poster have a go at TMQ. He’s one of the least offensive guys on here. Convivial and a man who gives a precious commodity to others-his time. That poster was the Pedro 72/P72/M72 guy.
Let’s see how it all pans out.
posted on 18/1/20
This article is a tough read
No question
posted on 18/1/20
<He’s one of the least offensive guys on here.>
Take that back ya kvnt
posted on 18/1/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 18 minutes ago
Admin - I will say this - you will never get any new posters at this rate. 'Who were you' - 'You were so and so' - why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely thought you were. Didn't realise it was a new account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s not a new poster. He was Pedro72, then changed it to P72 when he realised he’d backed a total loser, then M72 before he was banned. He’s been on here several times under different guises, and banned every time.
The irony of him going on about internet hardmen, yet being too cowardly to admit to being on here before is off the scale.
It’s also ironic that he’s going on about the lack of new posters and how they’re treated, yet he comes on here and is nothing but abrasive to existing posters. I’ve only ever seen one poster have a go at TMQ. He’s one of the least offensive guys on here. Convivial and a man who gives a precious commodity to others-his time. That poster was the Pedro 72/P72/M72 guy.
Let’s see how it all pans out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 18/1/20
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 4 minutes ago
<He’s one of the least offensive guys on here.>
Take that back ya kvnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn’t say that to my face though, would you?!? Fvcking old dinosaur.
posted on 18/1/20
Funny how it works out.
A' the fake death and double accounting posters are tims.
A' the 'new' posters who can name the 'gangs' & 'cliques' are Bears.
posted on 18/1/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 18 minutes ago
Admin - I will say this - you will never get any new posters at this rate. 'Who were you' - 'You were so and so' - why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuinely thought you were. Didn't realise it was a new account
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s not a new poster. He was Pedro72, then changed it to P72 when he realised he’d backed a total loser, then M72 before he was banned. He’s been on here several times under different guises, and banned every time.
The irony of him going on about internet hardmen, yet being too cowardly to admit to being on here before is off the scale.
It’s also ironic that he’s going on about the lack of new posters and how they’re treated, yet he comes on here and is nothing but abrasive to existing posters. I’ve only ever seen one poster have a go at TMQ. He’s one of the least offensive guys on here. Convivial and a man who gives a precious commodity to others-his time. That poster was the Pedro 72/P72/M72 guy.
Let’s see how it all pans out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea who you are but hey-ho.
So have you read some of Quinn's posts which were slagging me in derogatory terms or have those been conveniently missed?
I did not initiate any derogatory language but I guess you have conveniently missed this?
Look - just say new Rangers poster = Bad. New Celtic poster = Good.
Don't you see why this site is not attracting new posters?
posted on 18/1/20
I really cannot stand this - why are new posters hounded off of here because they are not 'regulars'?
posted on 18/1/20
posted on 18/1/20
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
<Look at the state of you chaps.>
Says the 'newbie' who drops a Fritzel ref on a lightweight forum.
<sigh> I'll try but fail to be the Tim Elite Wolf.
Utter state of you ya kvnt.
Fvkin phanny
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lovely language for what the poster 'Lauders' called it for what it is - banter.
Yet you conveniently forget this exchange?
posted on 18/1/20
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
posted on 18/1/20
<have you read some of Quinn's posts which were slagging me in derogatory terms>
Starting to like you.
posted on 18/1/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha - oh - so not such a prolonged paragraph or 2 this time?
Rather telling.
posted on 18/1/20
A serious question - why do you feel the need to bully someone off of a forum?
Does it empower you to get one over on a Rangers poster?
Just let it go - whoever wins the league, wins - that is it.
posted on 18/1/20
<I'll try but fail to be the Tim Elite Wolf. Utter state of you ya kvnt. Fvkin phanny>
You do know I was parodying a Rangers fan on here?
Who uses such terms in a highly humourous vein?
You must know this.
You've clearly studied the forum for a long long time.
posted on 18/1/20
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 minute ago
<I'll try but fail to be the Tim Elite Wolf. Utter state of you ya kvnt. Fvkin phanny>
You do know I was parodying a Rangers fan on here?
Who uses such terms in a highly humourous vein?
You must know this.
You've clearly studied the forum for a long long time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice back-track action.
Forget it. I can't be assed with people like you who try to bully people off of forums.
posted on 18/1/20
Starting to really like you now.
posted on 18/1/20
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha - oh - so not such a prolonged paragraph or 2 this time?
Rather telling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it?! You can tell something from that, but couldn’t understand obvious statements previously?!
No worries, coward.
Here’s the thing-we’ve all been new posters at some stage. But most of us have always had the same name and account number. There’s very, very few of us who’ve slated the site, been banned several times, yet keep coming back. And every time you come back, you slate the place!
Keep going. Your patter was the exact same last time. You were too cowardly to admit being on here before until admin banned you and confirmed you’d been on as a previous poster.
posted on 18/1/20
DC mate.
You just tell me who's being bad to you.
Now that you an me are buddies.
I'm the er .... hardman? on here.
I'll fix them mate - every kvnt on here is shyyte scared o me.
posted on 18/1/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
Yeah, you tried to hide behind the ‘new poster’ stuff the last time. It didn’t work then either.
Like I said-a complete and utter coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha - oh - so not such a prolonged paragraph or 2 this time?
Rather telling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it?! You can tell something from that, but couldn’t understand obvious statements previously?!
No worries, coward.
Here’s the thing-we’ve all been new posters at some stage. But most of us have always had the same name and account number. There’s very, very few of us who’ve slated the site, been banned several times, yet keep coming back. And every time you come back, you slate the place!
Keep going. Your patter was the exact same last time. You were too cowardly to admit being on here before until admin banned you and confirmed you’d been on as a previous poster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea who you are but you seem to spend a lot of time trying to get people banned.
Sad life man.
posted on 18/1/20
I would think both Rangers and Celtic fans are rather underwhelmed with the cup showings
Only crumb of comfort would be Rangers included 7 not selected for the recent Glasgow derby
I assume Celtic were similar
Not much to be read into either game imo
posted on 18/1/20
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
I would think both Rangers and Celtic fans are rather underwhelmed with the cup showings
Only crumb of comfort would be Rangers included 7 not selected for the recent Glasgow derby
I assume Celtic were similar
Not much to be read into either game imo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steady with the truth.
posted on 18/1/20
Listen mate.
Friendly advice.
You talking constantly 'bout getting folk banned.
Seems it kinda hangs heavy on ye.
As a mate - maybe you should cut this back?
posted on 18/1/20
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 24 seconds ago
Listen mate.
Friendly advice.
You talking constantly 'bout getting folk banned.
Seems it kinda hangs heavy on ye.
As a mate - maybe you should cut this back?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'Oh - ok, Boss - loud and clear'!
Must remember the rules.
Page 7 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10