Stop doing this to me Joby. It will be 4-1-4-1 if it’s those players like it was against Burnley.
Tielemans is proper pants when he plays deep.
I think we will win tonight, we have to get a result with Chelsea dropping points again.
I believe Anderson is out which is a plus for us.
comment by Merseysidefox (U4842)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
Stop doing this to me Joby. It will be 4-1-4-1 if it’s those players like it was against Burnley.
Tielemans is proper pants when he plays deep.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about?
Schmeichel is the lone striker!
An interesting match, our reserves beat them last time but they’ve now got the new Manager bounce.
Finely balanced.
I think Ndidi will be brought back in.
If not, I’d play Mendy and basically have roughly the above team but would bring in Nacho for Perez
Hopefully Tielemans will be fresher after a bit of a rest. As for Mendy, he can do a job to an extent but can't provide the kind of cover Ndidi does on his own. Having a player next to him would likely help on that front, although it would mean Tielemans putting in a shift and doing a lot of thankless work in order to help the 3 play.
I'd be very nervous to see Wilf, either from the start or from the bench. And KTF1, I can't work out what formation you're playing with that. I agree with Black/Brown/WhateverColourHeIsToday Starr that formations aren't everything, but there has to be something identifiable out there. Unless you're planning to play Iheanacho on the right wing, in which case I disagree muchly and fear that has more chance of regressing him than working.
comment by Jobyfox (U4183)
posted 5 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by Merseysidefox (U4842)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
Stop doing this to me Joby. It will be 4-1-4-1 if it’s those players like it was against Burnley.
Tielemans is proper pants when he plays deep.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about?
Schmeichel is the lone striker!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
Play Mendy and Tielemans as a pair but with different roles and then Barnes, Nacho and Maddison in behind as a interchangeable 3 behind Vardy.
As far as I’m concerned we don’t play with wingers
I wouldn't put Iheanacho in that role. I reckon you're better off giving Gray a shot at that.
Nacho is a 9 or 10 and nothing else. Ever!
Tielemans should never be a defensive midfielder. Ever.
Maddison should never be a wide striker. Ever.
Perez should never be an anything. Ever.
Joby I owe you an apology - we did set up 4-2-3-1!!
As they say here in Liverpool - I’ve had my eye wiped (still no idea what it’s about but basically I was wrong!).
8 clear of Chelsea
14 clear of United
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Leicester v West Ham Pre-Match
Page 1 of 1
posted on 22/1/20
Stop doing this to me Joby. It will be 4-1-4-1 if it’s those players like it was against Burnley.
Tielemans is proper pants when he plays deep.
posted on 22/1/20
I think we will win tonight, we have to get a result with Chelsea dropping points again.
I believe Anderson is out which is a plus for us.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Merseysidefox (U4842)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
Stop doing this to me Joby. It will be 4-1-4-1 if it’s those players like it was against Burnley.
Tielemans is proper pants when he plays deep.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about?
Schmeichel is the lone striker!
posted on 22/1/20
An interesting match, our reserves beat them last time but they’ve now got the new Manager bounce.
Finely balanced.
posted on 22/1/20
I think Ndidi will be brought back in.
If not, I’d play Mendy and basically have roughly the above team but would bring in Nacho for Perez
posted on 22/1/20
Hopefully Tielemans will be fresher after a bit of a rest. As for Mendy, he can do a job to an extent but can't provide the kind of cover Ndidi does on his own. Having a player next to him would likely help on that front, although it would mean Tielemans putting in a shift and doing a lot of thankless work in order to help the 3 play.
I'd be very nervous to see Wilf, either from the start or from the bench. And KTF1, I can't work out what formation you're playing with that. I agree with Black/Brown/WhateverColourHeIsToday Starr that formations aren't everything, but there has to be something identifiable out there. Unless you're planning to play Iheanacho on the right wing, in which case I disagree muchly and fear that has more chance of regressing him than working.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Jobyfox (U4183)
posted 5 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by Merseysidefox (U4842)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
Stop doing this to me Joby. It will be 4-1-4-1 if it’s those players like it was against Burnley.
Tielemans is proper pants when he plays deep.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about?
Schmeichel is the lone striker!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
posted on 22/1/20
Play Mendy and Tielemans as a pair but with different roles and then Barnes, Nacho and Maddison in behind as a interchangeable 3 behind Vardy.
posted on 22/1/20
As far as I’m concerned we don’t play with wingers
posted on 22/1/20
I wouldn't put Iheanacho in that role. I reckon you're better off giving Gray a shot at that.
posted on 22/1/20
Nacho is a 9 or 10 and nothing else. Ever!
Tielemans should never be a defensive midfielder. Ever.
Maddison should never be a wide striker. Ever.
Perez should never be an anything. Ever.
posted on 22/1/20
Joby I owe you an apology - we did set up 4-2-3-1!!
As they say here in Liverpool - I’ve had my eye wiped (still no idea what it’s about but basically I was wrong!).
posted on 22/1/20
8 clear of Chelsea
14 clear of United
Page 1 of 1