Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by We-are (U19211)
posted 4 minutes ago
You still crying about brexit you mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take back arr country weare. Foreigners taking all arr apostrophise , arr semi colons and arr commas. Next vlad the pole will be after arr full stops and are question marks. Take back arr grammar v4 it’s too l8!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not pirates. You need to practice a bit more
what like here.................
Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 10 minutes ago
Time too take are country back
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I spelt "are" correctly. He was being a pirate talking nonsense
<Am no gonnae come and bum ye>
Canny say fairer than that man
<Canary Wharf>
Hah!
Just saw this.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
comment by Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 12 minutes ago
I spelt "are" correctly. He was being a pirate talking nonsense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is it with pirates??? These are rapists, murderers and terrorists yet we happily dress "are" kids in pirate outfits as if they are role models
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 12 minutes ago
I spelt "are" correctly. He was being a pirate talking nonsense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is it with pirates??? These are rapists, murderers and terrorists yet we happily dress "are" kids in pirate outfits as if they are role models
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the thing with pirates - people think they're not good role models, but they aargh
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
<What is it with pirates??? These are rapists, murderers and terrorists yet we happily dress "are" kids in pirate outfits as if they are role models>
Haw!
Frankie Drake was a pirate.
And he got knighted for his endeavours ( as do all the rsoles ).
Cos he was Brit it was just a laugh and they called him a privateer.
Yeah but how nice is the weather woman on Reporting Scotland?
Wondered when you were gonna ask that.
You sure as fvk keep us waiting.
Homely & available.
Ahhhhh!
<That's the thing with pirates - people think they're not good role models, but they aargh>
Nutter.
Welcome aboard matey.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 5 minutes ago
Wondered when you were gonna ask that.
You sure as fvk keep us waiting.
Homely & available.
Ahhhhh!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just checked and she's not single but this Andrew guy looks like he could be persuaded to watch and be made to feel grateful for doing so. So I could give that a go
I didn't wonder when you were gonna post that.
Pointy li'l help here
Probably covered but grammatically it’s neither correct or incorrect, as I understand it?
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, demolishing most of Stoke would certainly get my vote! Most of the residents would feel more comfortable in caves anyway, if it's anything like it was last time I was there (early 90's)
comment by Biglaa (U5954)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, demolishing most of Stoke would certainly get my vote! Most of the residents would feel more comfortable in caves anyway, if it's anything like it was last time I was there (early 90's)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How would they be able to tell?
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good Stuart.
“At risk” in no way adds any credence whatsoever to the bunkum that projects have been suddenly stopped mid project as was the earlier ludicrous claim.
Nice try though
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good Stuart.
“At risk” in no way adds any credence whatsoever to the bunkum that projects have been suddenly stopped mid project as was the earlier ludicrous claim.
Nice try though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/12/uk-scientists-dropped-from-eu-projects-because-of-post-brexit-funding-fears
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal
“Under the Withdrawal Agreement negotiated with the EU, the UK will continue to participate in the programmes financed by the current EU Budget until their closure. This means that all EU funded programmes will be fully funded under the current 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.”
After 2020 EU funding stops. The government has not committed to future funding. So how do you expect them to continue?
A high profile example being the EU’s Galileo (satellite navigation) project. The UK has pumped in over a billion pounds into the project, and UK companies have been able to procure lucrative development contracts.
The UK also successfully had a motion passed in the EU parliament which ensured future procurement for Galileo can only be tendered by member states. The irony.
https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk-to-build-own-satellite-system-after-may-rules-out-using-eus-galileo-project-11568204
To go back to the gym analogy, you cannot expect to use all the facilities in a gym when you cancel your membership.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good Stuart.
“At risk” in no way adds any credence whatsoever to the bunkum that projects have been suddenly stopped mid project as was the earlier ludicrous claim.
Nice try though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/12/uk-scientists-dropped-from-eu-projects-because-of-post-brexit-funding-fears
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal
“Under the Withdrawal Agreement negotiated with the EU, the UK will continue to participate in the programmes financed by the current EU Budget until their closure. This means that all EU funded programmes will be fully funded under the current 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.”
After 2020 EU funding stops. The government has not committed to future funding. So how do you expect them to continue?
A high profile example being the EU’s Galileo (satellite navigation) project. The UK has pumped in over a billion pounds into the project, and UK companies have been able to procure lucrative development contracts.
The UK also successfully had a motion passed in the EU parliament which ensured future procurement for Galileo can only be tendered by member states. The irony.
https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk-to-build-own-satellite-system-after-may-rules-out-using-eus-galileo-project-11568204
To go back to the gym analogy, you cannot expect to use all the facilities in a gym when you cancel your membership.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t and neither do the U.K. government. But again all I was saying that the nonsense stating that projects had been abandoned mid way was just, well nonsense really.
As for funding in the future; we’ll fund our own and the EU will fund theirs I guess.
Ginger
Funding, whilst very important, is not the only issue. Post 2020 it will be much harder, (and in some instances simply impossible) for UK (third country) companies to procure EU contracts.
For example in regard to Galelio, Airbus and British aerospace, (as well as a host of tech companies) will lose out to their European competitors.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-airbus/airbus-says-eu-should-keep-britain-in-galileo-space-project-despite-brexit-idUSKBN1H42ED
There are hundreds of other projects the UK (after spending many years and considerable resources) will no longer be able to contribute to/benefit from.
Will the UK government continue to fund UK schemes which rely on joint cooperation with EU counterparts? The fact the government haven’t bothered to cost, or commit to them post 2020 should tell you all you need to know.
Sign in if you want to comment
Brexit Coin
Page 3 of 4
posted on 27/1/20
Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by We-are (U19211)
posted 4 minutes ago
You still crying about brexit you mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take back arr country weare. Foreigners taking all arr apostrophise , arr semi colons and arr commas. Next vlad the pole will be after arr full stops and are question marks. Take back arr grammar v4 it’s too l8!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not pirates. You need to practice a bit more
what like here.................
Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 10 minutes ago
Time too take are country back
posted on 27/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/1/20
I spelt "are" correctly. He was being a pirate talking nonsense
posted on 27/1/20
<Am no gonnae come and bum ye>
Canny say fairer than that man
posted on 27/1/20
<Canary Wharf>
Hah!
Just saw this.
posted on 27/1/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
posted on 27/1/20
comment by Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 12 minutes ago
I spelt "are" correctly. He was being a pirate talking nonsense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is it with pirates??? These are rapists, murderers and terrorists yet we happily dress "are" kids in pirate outfits as if they are role models
posted on 27/1/20
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Frederic Daquin (U1734)
posted 12 minutes ago
I spelt "are" correctly. He was being a pirate talking nonsense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is it with pirates??? These are rapists, murderers and terrorists yet we happily dress "are" kids in pirate outfits as if they are role models
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the thing with pirates - people think they're not good role models, but they aargh
posted on 27/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/1/20
<What is it with pirates??? These are rapists, murderers and terrorists yet we happily dress "are" kids in pirate outfits as if they are role models>
Haw!
Frankie Drake was a pirate.
And he got knighted for his endeavours ( as do all the rsoles ).
Cos he was Brit it was just a laugh and they called him a privateer.
posted on 27/1/20
Yeah but how nice is the weather woman on Reporting Scotland?
posted on 27/1/20
Wondered when you were gonna ask that.
You sure as fvk keep us waiting.
Homely & available.
Ahhhhh!
posted on 27/1/20
<That's the thing with pirates - people think they're not good role models, but they aargh>
Nutter.
Welcome aboard matey.
posted on 27/1/20
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 5 minutes ago
Wondered when you were gonna ask that.
You sure as fvk keep us waiting.
Homely & available.
Ahhhhh!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just checked and she's not single but this Andrew guy looks like he could be persuaded to watch and be made to feel grateful for doing so. So I could give that a go
posted on 27/1/20
I didn't wonder when you were gonna post that.
Pointy li'l help here
posted on 28/1/20
Probably covered but grammatically it’s neither correct or incorrect, as I understand it?
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, demolishing most of Stoke would certainly get my vote! Most of the residents would feel more comfortable in caves anyway, if it's anything like it was last time I was there (early 90's)
posted on 28/1/20
Oaft
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Biglaa (U5954)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, demolishing most of Stoke would certainly get my vote! Most of the residents would feel more comfortable in caves anyway, if it's anything like it was last time I was there (early 90's)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How would they be able to tell?
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good Stuart.
“At risk” in no way adds any credence whatsoever to the bunkum that projects have been suddenly stopped mid project as was the earlier ludicrous claim.
Nice try though
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good Stuart.
“At risk” in no way adds any credence whatsoever to the bunkum that projects have been suddenly stopped mid project as was the earlier ludicrous claim.
Nice try though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/12/uk-scientists-dropped-from-eu-projects-because-of-post-brexit-funding-fears
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal
“Under the Withdrawal Agreement negotiated with the EU, the UK will continue to participate in the programmes financed by the current EU Budget until their closure. This means that all EU funded programmes will be fully funded under the current 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.”
After 2020 EU funding stops. The government has not committed to future funding. So how do you expect them to continue?
A high profile example being the EU’s Galileo (satellite navigation) project. The UK has pumped in over a billion pounds into the project, and UK companies have been able to procure lucrative development contracts.
The UK also successfully had a motion passed in the EU parliament which ensured future procurement for Galileo can only be tendered by member states. The irony.
https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk-to-build-own-satellite-system-after-may-rules-out-using-eus-galileo-project-11568204
To go back to the gym analogy, you cannot expect to use all the facilities in a gym when you cancel your membership.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Better than Goze... (U3126)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 39 seconds ago
<Strikes me there are parts of the country that have come together that we’re previously torn.>
Where?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the East Midlands and East England that voted 70% leave for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here in stoke an over whelming majority voted for leave. What they didn't take into account was all the regeneration money was coming from Europe and has stopped mid project. Projects being knocking down old housing stock and getting full market value for your house rather than clearance value (basically thousands of pounds lost of clearance value and if you have no insurance you're fecked)
Think same will happen in Sunderland, another area with huge money from Europe. But again majority voted leave.
This is what I can't get my head around those benefitting most wanted out??? What's that about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t believe a single word of that.
We are still in the EU. Money for these projects have had fair contributions from the U.K. They absolutely will not have stopped mud project at all.
Christ I don’t mind people pointing out the good and the bad, but let’s but just make sheite up eh?
If any projects have stopped it’s not because we voted to leave the EU ffs.
Honestly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All these projects are at risk as post 2020 the UK government has not committed to funding (all jointly UK/EU funded):
https://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/business-funding/eu-funding/examples_en
Since 2016 a raft of projects, most notably in science and research, have been forced to close, or withdraw from EU schemes, as the UK government cannot commit to future grants post 2020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good Stuart.
“At risk” in no way adds any credence whatsoever to the bunkum that projects have been suddenly stopped mid project as was the earlier ludicrous claim.
Nice try though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/12/uk-scientists-dropped-from-eu-projects-because-of-post-brexit-funding-fears
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal/the-governments-guarantee-for-eu-funded-programmes-if-theres-no-brexit-deal
“Under the Withdrawal Agreement negotiated with the EU, the UK will continue to participate in the programmes financed by the current EU Budget until their closure. This means that all EU funded programmes will be fully funded under the current 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.”
After 2020 EU funding stops. The government has not committed to future funding. So how do you expect them to continue?
A high profile example being the EU’s Galileo (satellite navigation) project. The UK has pumped in over a billion pounds into the project, and UK companies have been able to procure lucrative development contracts.
The UK also successfully had a motion passed in the EU parliament which ensured future procurement for Galileo can only be tendered by member states. The irony.
https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk-to-build-own-satellite-system-after-may-rules-out-using-eus-galileo-project-11568204
To go back to the gym analogy, you cannot expect to use all the facilities in a gym when you cancel your membership.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t and neither do the U.K. government. But again all I was saying that the nonsense stating that projects had been abandoned mid way was just, well nonsense really.
As for funding in the future; we’ll fund our own and the EU will fund theirs I guess.
posted on 28/1/20
Ginger
Funding, whilst very important, is not the only issue. Post 2020 it will be much harder, (and in some instances simply impossible) for UK (third country) companies to procure EU contracts.
For example in regard to Galelio, Airbus and British aerospace, (as well as a host of tech companies) will lose out to their European competitors.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-airbus/airbus-says-eu-should-keep-britain-in-galileo-space-project-despite-brexit-idUSKBN1H42ED
There are hundreds of other projects the UK (after spending many years and considerable resources) will no longer be able to contribute to/benefit from.
Will the UK government continue to fund UK schemes which rely on joint cooperation with EU counterparts? The fact the government haven’t bothered to cost, or commit to them post 2020 should tell you all you need to know.
Page 3 of 4