he reads the sun
is it for page 3?
dear deirdre?
the articles about steamy romps?
cause if u sit in front of a mirror at urs maws you will probably be sorted for 1 & 3.
then you can write to dierdre about it.
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 19 seconds ago
he reads the sun
is it for page 3?
dear deirdre?
the articles about steamy romps?
cause if u sit in front of a mirror at urs maws you will probably be sorted for 1 & 3.
then you can write to dierdre about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - there, there. Calm doon.
I know that no negative stories about Celtic are welcomed on here
Surprised Rangers haven’t done the same, seeing as it was their player that they used for a dodgy translation.
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Surprised Rangers haven’t done the same, seeing as it was their player that they used for a dodgy translation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the pandemonium if Ofcom investigate the incident and Sky spill the beans that the translation came from Rangers, or was better by them before it went on air
Found to be hanging their own player out to dry because they're desperate to sell him
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes they are and always have been.
It’s they who are boycotting Rangers
I thought you’d know this by now
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Surprised Rangers haven’t done the same, seeing as it was their player that they used for a dodgy translation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the pandemonium if Ofcom investigate the incident and Sky spill the beans that the translation came from Rangers, or was better by them before it went on air
Found to be hanging their own player out to dry because they're desperate to sell him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes - imagine.
There is of course that song - it involves dreamers
Because they're are supporting an employee who is banned from Ibrox.
Even the BBC have integrity
Rangers still not backing Morelos or have anything to say about him being misquoted? Odd that. Leaving an employee hanging out to dry like that.
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
Because they're are supporting an employee who is banned from Ibrox.
Even the BBC have integrity
Rangers still not backing Morelos or have anything to say about him being misquoted? Odd that. Leaving an employee hanging out to dry like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not backing him?
Eh?! Tell me you aren't being serious?! FFS
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
Because they're are supporting an employee who is banned from Ibrox.
Even the BBC have integrity
Rangers still not backing Morelos or have anything to say about him being misquoted? Odd that. Leaving an employee hanging out to dry like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The BBC Scotland sports department has zero integrity.
They’ve proved this many times
So Rangers have released a statement asking why Sky fabricated lies about their player?
That's news to me.
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 33 seconds ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revered by the Ghreen Bhrigade though!
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that when you come back as a different username?
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would whank not suffice?
People choose to be whanks.
Others are less fortunate.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that when you come back as a different username?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No - why?
You may not like but what is being posted when it involves your club - I get that. Try addressing the point. Your club have thrown the toys right oot.
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 33 seconds ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revered by the Ghreen Bhrigade though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah he's a fud
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would whank not suffice?
People choose to be whanks.
Others are less fortunate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably aye.
Having seen him he's pretty unfortunate.
Don't mean any offence to any other than him though.
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where exactly am I lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments?
As I said - you do like a bit of revisionism!
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. He was banned and the ban was rescinded after talks between the BBC and Rangers.
He was banned again after his programme on Rangers going into administration, which included the classy animation of Ally McCoist committing suicide
comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. He was banned and the ban was rescinded after talks between the BBC and Rangers.
He was banned again after his programme on Rangers going into administration, which included the classy animation of Ally McCoist committing suicide
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enough of your facts. FFS!
Sign in if you want to comment
Oh Dear - Laughable!
Page 1 of 5
posted on 11/2/20
he reads the sun
is it for page 3?
dear deirdre?
the articles about steamy romps?
cause if u sit in front of a mirror at urs maws you will probably be sorted for 1 & 3.
then you can write to dierdre about it.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 19 seconds ago
he reads the sun
is it for page 3?
dear deirdre?
the articles about steamy romps?
cause if u sit in front of a mirror at urs maws you will probably be sorted for 1 & 3.
then you can write to dierdre about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - there, there. Calm doon.
I know that no negative stories about Celtic are welcomed on here
posted on 11/2/20
Surprised Rangers haven’t done the same, seeing as it was their player that they used for a dodgy translation.
posted on 11/2/20
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
posted on 11/2/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Surprised Rangers haven’t done the same, seeing as it was their player that they used for a dodgy translation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the pandemonium if Ofcom investigate the incident and Sky spill the beans that the translation came from Rangers, or was better by them before it went on air
Found to be hanging their own player out to dry because they're desperate to sell him
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes they are and always have been.
It’s they who are boycotting Rangers
I thought you’d know this by now
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Surprised Rangers haven’t done the same, seeing as it was their player that they used for a dodgy translation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the pandemonium if Ofcom investigate the incident and Sky spill the beans that the translation came from Rangers, or was better by them before it went on air
Found to be hanging their own player out to dry because they're desperate to sell him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes - imagine.
There is of course that song - it involves dreamers
posted on 11/2/20
Because they're are supporting an employee who is banned from Ibrox.
Even the BBC have integrity
Rangers still not backing Morelos or have anything to say about him being misquoted? Odd that. Leaving an employee hanging out to dry like that.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
Because they're are supporting an employee who is banned from Ibrox.
Even the BBC have integrity
Rangers still not backing Morelos or have anything to say about him being misquoted? Odd that. Leaving an employee hanging out to dry like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not backing him?
Eh?! Tell me you aren't being serious?! FFS
posted on 11/2/20
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
Because they're are supporting an employee who is banned from Ibrox.
Even the BBC have integrity
Rangers still not backing Morelos or have anything to say about him being misquoted? Odd that. Leaving an employee hanging out to dry like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The BBC Scotland sports department has zero integrity.
They’ve proved this many times
posted on 11/2/20
So Rangers have released a statement asking why Sky fabricated lies about their player?
That's news to me.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 33 seconds ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revered by the Ghreen Bhrigade though!
posted on 11/2/20
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that when you come back as a different username?
posted on 11/2/20
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would whank not suffice?
People choose to be whanks.
Others are less fortunate.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that when you come back as a different username?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No - why?
You may not like but what is being posted when it involves your club - I get that. Try addressing the point. Your club have thrown the toys right oot.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 33 seconds ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revered by the Ghreen Bhrigade though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah he's a fud
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
Anyone seen James McLean's tweet.
He's a m0ngo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would whank not suffice?
People choose to be whanks.
Others are less fortunate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably aye.
Having seen him he's pretty unfortunate.
Don't mean any offence to any other than him though.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where exactly am I lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments?
As I said - you do like a bit of revisionism!
posted on 11/2/20
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. He was banned and the ban was rescinded after talks between the BBC and Rangers.
He was banned again after his programme on Rangers going into administration, which included the classy animation of Ally McCoist committing suicide
posted on 11/2/20
comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 second ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's negative about it?
Company slanders our support by misquoting/fabricating lies.
Company refuses to explain itself.
Company told that until it does, it loses its privilege.
Are the BBC welcome at Ibrox yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha - was waiting for 'BBC Bingo' to come in and there it is 'House'!!
But when we banned the BBC - wasn't that mocked on here? I am hazarding a guess but I think it probably was.
The hypocrisy is fantastic on here at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because your fans didn't like the output of one reporter.
Sky have blatantly fabricated lies.
Huge difference
But you know that. Or maybe you don't. Dunno which is worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have to love revisionism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Revisionism?
You banned McLaughlin for reporting on fan arrests and sectarian singing after a cup game.
Now you're all of a sudden lauding the reporting of fan arrests and racist comments.
And you've the cheek to label anyone else a hypocrite too 🤦♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. He was banned and the ban was rescinded after talks between the BBC and Rangers.
He was banned again after his programme on Rangers going into administration, which included the classy animation of Ally McCoist committing suicide
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enough of your facts. FFS!
Page 1 of 5