And again I'll state that Rangers didn't ban the BBC. The BBC boycotted Rangers.

as I understand it, rangers banned the bbc a few years ago, lifted the ban, then banned just mclaughlin, and the bbc said if you can't have him then you can't have anyone.

correct?

comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 1 minute ago
"If it was a case of them having an opinion that we didn’t like and banning them, then I’d agree."

So you're saying Chris McLaughlin got banned because of an opinion piece?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh-no. I never mentioned anything about any other club banning any broadcaster. I did reply to a comment by a rangers fan saying that you haven’t banned the BBC.

Were you not the one the other day going on about Celtic fans being mega paranoid?!

comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 minutes ago
Very juvenile approach from celtic here.

Biting the hands that feeds them - over reaction and quite ungrateful for all the protection they have been afforded from Sky through the years.

Just who is making these woeful decisions?*
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You found your spoon again?

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 minutes ago
Very juvenile approach from celtic here.

Biting the hands that feeds them - over reaction and quite ungrateful for all the protection they have been afforded from Sky through the years.

Just who is making these woeful decisions?*
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You found your spoon again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

*the previous post by the author in no way fully represents his actual views.

The post was a mimic of the rationale used on here during the BBC/Rangers contretemps....

And Ginger - yes, not my best effort though

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 1 minute ago
"If it was a case of them having an opinion that we didn’t like and banning them, then I’d agree."

So you're saying Chris McLaughlin got banned because of an opinion piece?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh-no. I never mentioned anything about any other club banning any broadcaster. I did reply to a comment by a rangers fan saying that you haven’t banned the BBC.

Were you not the one the other day going on about Celtic fans being mega paranoid?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and my point stands 100%

I agree with celtic here.

tell us who translated it, and we will let you back in, you snide cvnts.

comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 minutes ago
Very juvenile approach from celtic here.

Biting the hands that feeds them - over reaction and quite ungrateful for all the protection they have been afforded from Sky through the years.

Just who is making these woeful decisions?*
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You found your spoon again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

*the previous post by the author in no way fully represents his actual views.

The post was a mimic of the rationale used on here during the BBC/Rangers contretemps....

And Ginger - yes, not my best effort though
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Good man

Glad to see you back

comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 47 seconds ago
I agree with celtic here.

tell us who translated it, and we will let you back in, you snide cvnts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



And this is why we have a professional PR department

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 minutes ago
Very juvenile approach from celtic here.

Biting the hands that feeds them - over reaction and quite ungrateful for all the protection they have been afforded from Sky through the years.

Just who is making these woeful decisions?*
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You found your spoon again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

*the previous post by the author in no way fully represents his actual views.

The post was a mimic of the rationale used on here during the BBC/Rangers contretemps....

And Ginger - yes, not my best effort though
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Good man

Glad to see you back
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 1 minute ago
"If it was a case of them having an opinion that we didn’t like and banning them, then I’d agree."

So you're saying Chris McLaughlin got banned because of an opinion piece?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh-no. I never mentioned anything about any other club banning any broadcaster. I did reply to a comment by a rangers fan saying that you haven’t banned the BBC.

Were you not the one the other day going on about Celtic fans being mega paranoid?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and my point stands 100%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s clearly wrong then-especially with you.

There wasn’t even the slightest dig from me about rangers. I was only talking about Celtic. I know they’ve banned reporters in the past for comments they don’t agree with, and I think that’s pretty poor. In this case though, there’s been a deliberate attempt to misguide people as to what was actually being said. Until it’s resolved completely, then I don’t have a problem with Celtic refusing to cooperate with Sky.

But in your mind, somewhere I was talking about Chris McLaughlin...

Hope your day gets a bit better.

comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 3 minutes ago
I agree with celtic here.

tell us who translated it, and we will let you back in, you snide cvnts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s the ghost of Kofi Annan.

i think i'm a lot clearer in what i expect.

dear sky,

terms of re-entry.

1. tell us who translated it, and who approved it.
2. sack Kris boyd.
3. sack neil McCann
4. sack Kris commons
5. do not consider pat nevin as replacement.
6. sack andy walker
7. hire Chris Sutton
8. hire all mccoist
9. hire Michael stewart
10. hire steve craigan
11. follow exact same format as bt sport.

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rats juice a big perry baps nat ❤️ (U6393)
posted 1 minute ago
"If it was a case of them having an opinion that we didn’t like and banning them, then I’d agree."

So you're saying Chris McLaughlin got banned because of an opinion piece?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh-no. I never mentioned anything about any other club banning any broadcaster. I did reply to a comment by a rangers fan saying that you haven’t banned the BBC.

Were you not the one the other day going on about Celtic fans being mega paranoid?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and my point stands 100%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s clearly wrong then-especially with you.

There wasn’t even the slightest dig from me about rangers. I was only talking about Celtic. I know they’ve banned reporters in the past for comments they don’t agree with, and I think that’s pretty poor. In this case though, there’s been a deliberate attempt to misguide people as to what was actually being said. Until it’s resolved completely, then I don’t have a problem with Celtic refusing to cooperate with Sky.

But in your mind, somewhere I was talking about Chris McLaughlin...

Hope your day gets a bit better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye awrite Captain Verbosity calm yer breeks

‘ Aye awrite Captain Verbosity’

I’m not sure that’s any better than being captain obvious a couple of weeks ago.

You can join me though, captain Paranoid.

comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i think i'm a lot clearer in what i expect.

dear sky,

terms of re-entry.

1. tell us who translated it, and who approved it.
2. sack Kris boyd.
3. sack neil McCann
4. sack Kris commons
5. do not consider pat nevin as replacement.
6. sack andy walker
7. hire Chris Sutton
8. hire all mccoist
9. hire Michael stewart
10. hire steve craigan
11. follow exact same format as bt sport.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

8. hire all mccoist - is this another Rangers = fat bastirt thing?

could be

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘ Aye awrite Captain Verbosity’

I’m not sure that’s any better than being captain obvious a couple of weeks ago.

You can join me though, captain Paranoid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pfffft

A simple misunderstanding is very different from the likes of Refinpubgate. I don't think that level of paranoia will ever be beaten.

10. hire steve craigan

finally outed you as a current bun JFK

i like the bickering between them all mate.

i note how u pick craigan out despite me having mccoist in there

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Fook McCoist

Best thing about BT losing the Scottish rights is that cant won't be covering Rangers games.

comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 3 minutes ago
i like the bickering between them all mate.

i note how u pick craigan out despite me having mccoist in there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mccoist is decent and some banter between him and Sutton is ok. Craigan though is not beneficial to anything

McCoist hasn't ever shouted El Bufalo when Morelos has stepped up to take a penalty haha