Other clubs win things so it’s less realistic they’re players will go.

Reckon Kane has had enough of Levy’s lack of ambition and will be gone next year.

Levy is licking his lips ,at the mention of all that money ! adios Harry.

200m for a injury prone past his best player?

Completely agree Sutton is an awful pundit and not very clever. Bit disingenuous in regards to his career as he was a good player, at one time.

However it was Kane himself who spearheaded these stories, they wouldn't have the story if he didn't say what he did and who can blame him? This was a simple - 'Levy invest some money into the club or I'm off'. Poch tried it, it didn't work out for him. I suspect Kane will have more success.

comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 5 minutes ago
200m for a injury prone past his best player?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry fella, that's the starting price.

comment by Smeg and the club levy destroyed (U6574)
posted 6 minutes ago
Other clubs win things so it’s less realistic they’re players will go.

Reckon Kane has had enough of Levy’s lack of ambition and will be gone next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Other clubs, like you mean Man City, who buy them. In fifty years time Kane could then say I moved to a club and brought my medals.

If we get a ridiculously high transfer fee and he goes to a foreign club I'm ok with it.

Somebody else can pay him lots of money to spend half the season injured.

Plus we all know he isn't the player he was a couple of years ago.

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Smeg and the club levy destroyed (U6574)
posted 6 minutes ago
Other clubs win things so it’s less realistic they’re players will go.

Reckon Kane has had enough of Levy’s lack of ambition and will be gone next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Other clubs, like you mean Man City, who buy them. In fifty years time Kane could then say I moved to a club and brought my medals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs players all came through the academy. They obviously don't buy players.

Sandy if Kane requests a move 200 million will never happen. I think Kane wouldn't do so publicly and Levy would use that to try and inflate the fee but I think 100 million is fair, unless he stays in the premises, then I could see others asking for more.

Reading Levys message this morning I can bet we wont be spending much.
Wage cuts are going to be announced soon

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 5 minutes ago
200m for a injury prone past his best player?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry fella, that's the starting price.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You won't get more than a 100 mil, too injury prone these days

Now if salah or mane were to be sold 200 mil would be around the right value

You never hear them trying to sell players from other clubs.
———
You really do, sandy.

Spurs fans should get behind Kane more. Levy to do what's needed or else.

2 Points......

1).....Sutton won a premier league winners medal... which makes him more relevant than any spurs player for past 50+years

2)....... Nobody held a gun to Kane's head and made him do the interview. Pretty stupid timing with the current environment. Everybody knows he wants to win stuff and everybody knows Spurs isn't the place to achieve that

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Smeg and the club levy destroyed (U6574)
posted 6 minutes ago
Other clubs win things so it’s less realistic they’re players will go.

Reckon Kane has had enough of Levy’s lack of ambition and will be gone next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Other clubs, like you mean Man City, who buy them. In fifty years time Kane could then say I moved to a club and brought my medals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he wouldn't have had any to bring.

He’s only injury prone because we have to play him in every bloody game

This bitter article paints a clear picture of how Kane will be viewed if he does leave Spurs.

comment by Galvin (U22360)
posted 12 minutes ago
He’s only injury prone because we have to play him in every bloody game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
more like he demands to play. you do ok when he's injured overall so time to get a manger with a spine.
or is it levy who makes these decisions.

comment by Prankster - Dr Pu$$y (U22336)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by (kash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times Baby (U1108)
posted 5 minutes ago
200m for a injury prone past his best player?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry fella, that's the starting price.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You won't get more than a 100 mil, too injury prone these days

Now if salah or mane were to be sold 200 mil would be around the right value
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Mane

comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Sandy if Kane requests a move 200 million will never happen. I think Kane wouldn't do so publicly and Levy would use that to try and inflate the fee but I think 100 million is fair, unless he stays in the premises, then I could see others asking for more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this a flawed argument. Kane has won so many trophies on his own, including Golden boot, and has been consistently in the top of the goal scorers charts, even when he played less than most of his rivals and leads the attack for his country. With Kane being in the prime of his footballing life, and having still got 4 years left on his contract, a figure of £200million being branded isn't unrealistic.
Though, in the current climate can't see any club wanting to shell out that astronomical figure on a single player.
Although, we all know how devstating striker he is. Bullies, the defender, scores from left foot,, right foot and headers, takes penalties and can play link up as well.
Not many can match Kane in his pro approach. You add the attributes, and you can see why he would cost so much.

comment by Galvin (U22360)
posted 18 minutes ago
He’s only injury prone because we have to play him in every bloody game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This

Spurs’ record without Kane isn’t very good.

comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 26 minutes ago
2 Points......

1).....Sutton won a premier league winners medal... which makes him more relevant than any spurs player for past 50+years

2)....... Nobody held a gun to Kane's head and made him do the interview. Pretty stupid timing with the current environment. Everybody knows he wants to win stuff and everybody knows Spurs isn't the place to achieve that

----------------------------------------------------------------------

So Point One makes every Liverpool player for the last 30 years irrelevant as well. Got you.

Point two, unless you can see into the future how do you know Kane is not going to win anything at Spurs?

It’s a sad enrichment of Spurs ambitions of getting 200m rather than 100m is the ambition. Would think the ambition would to win a trophy

He’s not as good as Mbappe or Neymar, so would be less than them. But is English so carries a premium. You’d think 140 max

Comment deleted by Site Moderator