comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 seconds ago
By us, I meant OUR club.
Spend some time working on your grammar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your club is plastic. Success built on a rich owner breaking the rules.
Mr grammar is fine thanks. Maybe learn to count then work on your reading, ask your parents to home school you
https://www.joe.ie/uncategorized/liverpool-champions-league-game-involved-in-match-fixing-scandal-44635
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 seconds ago
https://www.joe.ie/uncategorized/liverpool-champions-league-game-involved-in-match-fixing-scandal-44635
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ The Danish newspaper Ekstra Bladet are claiming that the game in question was Liverpool's Champions League game in 2009 against Debrecen (the squad for which is pictured above to jog the memory), and the culprit was allegedly the Debrecen goalkeeper Vukasin Poleksic, who was bribed to concede more than 2.5 goals. Seeing as the match finished 1-0, we're not sure the money was spent so wisely.“
When you just read the headline instead of the content
Debrecen are just as bent as City, who knew?
Your history of match fixing goes back over a century.
Bent as a pigs tail and always have been.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Your history of match fixing goes back over a century.
Bent as a pigs tail and always have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100 year old whataboutery
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Yes Boris cause 45k to food banks is all Liverpool do annually.
FFS how are some people so invested in a rival club, it’s actually sad.
---------------------------------------------
Indeed, some people spend hours on other clubs boards making snide comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You wrote that looking in a mirror I assume...
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
If you're so certain city have done no wrong why you seem so stressed about it?
You remind me of Boris going around shaking hands saying it's all grand then he gets corona
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Your history of match fixing goes back over a century.
Bent as a pigs tail and always have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100 year old whataboutery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because City refused to participate?
And are now running around crying foul. They refused to participate so as to later make themselves out to be the oppressed.
The appeal should start with an application to dismiss the entire appeal on the grounds that City refused to cooperate with the body whose decision they wish to appeal and City to pay costs to other parties for wasting their time.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
--------------------------------------------------
City are taking UEFA to the CAS because they weren't allowed to see the evidence.
Most people would say that's a fare course of action except Arsenal and their cronies who are trying to make financial capital out of the situation.
If the evidence is made public and CAS rule against City, then both the club and the fans will accept the ruling.
That has been stated from Day 1 which was long before the virus outbreak.
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Wow. A new low for City. Trying to use a virus to hide their cheating.
'Please don't say anything about our cheating, there's a virus going around damnit!'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow I agree with TOOR
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
--------------------------------------------------
City are taking UEFA to the CAS because they weren't allowed to see the evidence.
Most people would say that's a fare course of action except Arsenal and their cronies who are trying to make financial capital out of the situation.
If the evidence is made public and CAS rule against City, then both the club and the fans will accept the ruling.
That has been stated from Day 1 which was long before the virus outbreak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what's the actual problem then?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
--------------------------------------------------
City are taking UEFA to the CAS because they weren't allowed to see the evidence.
Most people would say that's a fare course of action except Arsenal and their cronies who are trying to make financial capital out of the situation.
If the evidence is made public and CAS rule against City, then both the club and the fans will accept the ruling.
That has been stated from Day 1 which was long before the virus outbreak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naaah. City's argument is that the evidence is stolen and taken out of context.
Because City refused to participate?
And are now running around crying foul. They refused to participate so as to later make themselves out to be the oppressed.
The appeal should start with an application to dismiss the entire appeal on the grounds that City refused to cooperate with the body whose decision they wish to appeal and City to pay costs to other parties for wasting their time
---------------------------------------
Refused to participate with what exactly?
The unseen evidence is from emails hacked by a convicted blackmailer and fraudster.
City claim they have been edited and taken out of context - A fare point considering the source.
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 22 seconds ago
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stench of bin dippers on this thread would suggest otherwise
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Because City refused to participate?
And are now running around crying foul. They refused to participate so as to later make themselves out to be the oppressed.
The appeal should start with an application to dismiss the entire appeal on the grounds that City refused to cooperate with the body whose decision they wish to appeal and City to pay costs to other parties for wasting their time
---------------------------------------
Refused to participate with what exactly?
The unseen evidence is from emails hacked by a convicted blackmailer and fraudster.
City claim they have been edited and taken out of context - A fare point considering the source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But City's ban is reliant in more. Some of City's sponsorships have impossible values. Sponsorships must be at market values because no one is paying sponsorship at 10 times the expected rate.
Its against UEFA rules for sponsorships to be inflated and UEFA have acted on it before. City cannot argue this did not happen as the figures are there to compare with normal rates.
You'll get the ban reduced to a year if you're lucky.
comment by Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 22 seconds ago
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stench of bin dippers on this thread would suggest otherwise
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah
But City's ban is reliant in more. Some of City's sponsorships have impossible values. Sponsorships must be at market values because no one is paying sponsorship at 10 times the expected rate.
------------------------------------------------------
Please expand - Our sponsorship deals (apart from the ones with Puma and Nissan) are way below market value.
Etihad pay just £20m a year for shirt and stadium naming rights.
Arsenal's deal with Emirates is worth at least twice that.
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 23 minutes ago
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree knocking them out is great especially when you do it with a half fit squad
Why are Burnley in there? They are irrelevant little tinpot club who’s only claim to fame is winning the premiership money lottery. Otherwise they’d just be the obscure pointless local side they really see.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
But City's ban is reliant in more. Some of City's sponsorships have impossible values. Sponsorships must be at market values because no one is paying sponsorship at 10 times the expected rate.
------------------------------------------------------
Please expand - Our sponsorship deals (apart from the ones with Puma and Nissan) are way below market value.
Etihad pay just £20m a year for shirt and stadium naming rights.
Arsenal's deal with Emirates is worth at least twice that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When this news broke it was widely discussed in the media. Can't be assed to find it for you. Its your club after all so you should know.
Sign in if you want to comment
Disgraceful 8
Page 2 of 3
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 seconds ago
By us, I meant OUR club.
Spend some time working on your grammar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your club is plastic. Success built on a rich owner breaking the rules.
Mr grammar is fine thanks. Maybe learn to count then work on your reading, ask your parents to home school you
posted on 31/3/20
https://www.joe.ie/uncategorized/liverpool-champions-league-game-involved-in-match-fixing-scandal-44635
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 seconds ago
https://www.joe.ie/uncategorized/liverpool-champions-league-game-involved-in-match-fixing-scandal-44635
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ The Danish newspaper Ekstra Bladet are claiming that the game in question was Liverpool's Champions League game in 2009 against Debrecen (the squad for which is pictured above to jog the memory), and the culprit was allegedly the Debrecen goalkeeper Vukasin Poleksic, who was bribed to concede more than 2.5 goals. Seeing as the match finished 1-0, we're not sure the money was spent so wisely.“
When you just read the headline instead of the content
Debrecen are just as bent as City, who knew?
posted on 31/3/20
Your history of match fixing goes back over a century.
Bent as a pigs tail and always have been.
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Your history of match fixing goes back over a century.
Bent as a pigs tail and always have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100 year old whataboutery
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Yes Boris cause 45k to food banks is all Liverpool do annually.
FFS how are some people so invested in a rival club, it’s actually sad.
---------------------------------------------
Indeed, some people spend hours on other clubs boards making snide comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You wrote that looking in a mirror I assume...
posted on 31/3/20
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
posted on 31/3/20
If you're so certain city have done no wrong why you seem so stressed about it?
You remind me of Boris going around shaking hands saying it's all grand then he gets corona
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
posted on 31/3/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Your history of match fixing goes back over a century.
Bent as a pigs tail and always have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100 year old whataboutery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because City refused to participate?
And are now running around crying foul. They refused to participate so as to later make themselves out to be the oppressed.
The appeal should start with an application to dismiss the entire appeal on the grounds that City refused to cooperate with the body whose decision they wish to appeal and City to pay costs to other parties for wasting their time.
posted on 31/3/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
--------------------------------------------------
City are taking UEFA to the CAS because they weren't allowed to see the evidence.
Most people would say that's a fare course of action except Arsenal and their cronies who are trying to make financial capital out of the situation.
If the evidence is made public and CAS rule against City, then both the club and the fans will accept the ruling.
That has been stated from Day 1 which was long before the virus outbreak.
posted on 31/3/20
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
posted on 31/3/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Wow. A new low for City. Trying to use a virus to hide their cheating.
'Please don't say anything about our cheating, there's a virus going around damnit!'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow I agree with TOOR
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
--------------------------------------------------
City are taking UEFA to the CAS because they weren't allowed to see the evidence.
Most people would say that's a fare course of action except Arsenal and their cronies who are trying to make financial capital out of the situation.
If the evidence is made public and CAS rule against City, then both the club and the fans will accept the ruling.
That has been stated from Day 1 which was long before the virus outbreak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what's the actual problem then?
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
100 year old whataboutery
---------------------------------------
Whereas your club are baying for City to be banned without the evidence being heard in open court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take that up with UEFA as that’s down to them not Liverpool
How much are you going to cry if CAS uphold the ban?
--------------------------------------------------
City are taking UEFA to the CAS because they weren't allowed to see the evidence.
Most people would say that's a fare course of action except Arsenal and their cronies who are trying to make financial capital out of the situation.
If the evidence is made public and CAS rule against City, then both the club and the fans will accept the ruling.
That has been stated from Day 1 which was long before the virus outbreak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naaah. City's argument is that the evidence is stolen and taken out of context.
posted on 31/3/20
Because City refused to participate?
And are now running around crying foul. They refused to participate so as to later make themselves out to be the oppressed.
The appeal should start with an application to dismiss the entire appeal on the grounds that City refused to cooperate with the body whose decision they wish to appeal and City to pay costs to other parties for wasting their time
---------------------------------------
Refused to participate with what exactly?
The unseen evidence is from emails hacked by a convicted blackmailer and fraudster.
City claim they have been edited and taken out of context - A fare point considering the source.
posted on 31/3/20
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 22 seconds ago
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stench of bin dippers on this thread would suggest otherwise
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Because City refused to participate?
And are now running around crying foul. They refused to participate so as to later make themselves out to be the oppressed.
The appeal should start with an application to dismiss the entire appeal on the grounds that City refused to cooperate with the body whose decision they wish to appeal and City to pay costs to other parties for wasting their time
---------------------------------------
Refused to participate with what exactly?
The unseen evidence is from emails hacked by a convicted blackmailer and fraudster.
City claim they have been edited and taken out of context - A fare point considering the source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But City's ban is reliant in more. Some of City's sponsorships have impossible values. Sponsorships must be at market values because no one is paying sponsorship at 10 times the expected rate.
Its against UEFA rules for sponsorships to be inflated and UEFA have acted on it before. City cannot argue this did not happen as the figures are there to compare with normal rates.
You'll get the ban reduced to a year if you're lucky.
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 22 seconds ago
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stench of bin dippers on this thread would suggest otherwise
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah
posted on 31/3/20
But City's ban is reliant in more. Some of City's sponsorships have impossible values. Sponsorships must be at market values because no one is paying sponsorship at 10 times the expected rate.
------------------------------------------------------
Please expand - Our sponsorship deals (apart from the ones with Puma and Nissan) are way below market value.
Etihad pay just £20m a year for shirt and stadium naming rights.
Arsenal's deal with Emirates is worth at least twice that.
posted on 31/3/20
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 23 minutes ago
Do many people actually care if City are banned from Europe or not? I don't give a feck its irrelevant to me. Also. Beating City in Europe is great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree knocking them out is great especially when you do it with a half fit squad
posted on 31/3/20
Why are Burnley in there? They are irrelevant little tinpot club who’s only claim to fame is winning the premiership money lottery. Otherwise they’d just be the obscure pointless local side they really see.
posted on 31/3/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/3/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
But City's ban is reliant in more. Some of City's sponsorships have impossible values. Sponsorships must be at market values because no one is paying sponsorship at 10 times the expected rate.
------------------------------------------------------
Please expand - Our sponsorship deals (apart from the ones with Puma and Nissan) are way below market value.
Etihad pay just £20m a year for shirt and stadium naming rights.
Arsenal's deal with Emirates is worth at least twice that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When this news broke it was widely discussed in the media. Can't be assed to find it for you. Its your club after all so you should know.
Page 2 of 3