comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
The funny thing is that you think you can have sensible debate with people that are willing to destroy 5g masts because they think it causes coronavirus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 5 seconds ago
The funny thing is that you think you can have sensible debate with people that are willing to destroy 5g masts because they think it causes coronavirus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you listen to their reason(s), then one can counter their reasoning with facts/science. That;s more likely to be productive than the opposite.
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
please do try to respect the views of those that do.
———
Why should such absolute, batshiiiiiit craziness be respected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo & Copernicus suffered because of people like you.
Even if you think their idea is crazy, you should allow people to state their views and who knows, you can learn a thing or two from them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worst and most erroneous comment in JA606 history.
Hard line conspiracy theorists have no time for reason, facts and science. If they did they wouldn’t be conspiracy theorists.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
please do try to respect the views of those that do.
———
Why should such absolute, batshiiiiiit craziness be respected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo & Copernicus suffered because of people like you.
Even if you think their idea is crazy, you should allow people to state their views and who knows, you can learn a thing or two from them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Care to explain why the laugh emoji?
Unless probably, you don't know anything about those 2 I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo and Capernicus were persecuted as they went against the church. Not remotely similar to crazy conspiracy theories made up by John the factory worker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A better way to put it would be thus:
Their theory was against the popular paradigm at the time.
Society then were intollerant of any views outside what was considered mainstream. Just like some posters on here who are often too quick to shoot down views/opinions that's not mainstream today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but then that would suggest that crazy stupid conspiracy theories should be debated and given time and respect, when in reality they should be laughed at and harshly put down so that gullible people don't latch on to them.
Having a different opinion is fine. Having a stupid crazy opinion is stupid and crazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Hard line conspiracy theorists have no time for reason, facts and science. If they did they wouldn’t be conspiracy theorists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You might be correct.
But I still think it's better to listen to those with opposing views even if their views/opinion is absurd.
comment by Greenwood FC (U11781)
posted 49 minutes ago
Btw OP, how does it feel backing a complete clown like Boris now after the absolute shiiitshow he's infested on this country with the handling of the virus eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect he feels really glad he didn’t back Corbyn because it would be far worse.
No matter how much you keep knocking the current Government you know fully well how bad the alternative was.
You would, you seem to possess so many.
They could melt the masts down and make ventilators out of them, how hard can it be?
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
And these theories were shut down, but the weight of evidence and knowledge allowed for them to be proven correct. This is not the case in 99.009% of batshiiiiiiit crazy theories, and why the idea that they should all be treat with respect because the 0.001% should have been is monumentally stupid.
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 12 seconds ago
I think Aliens are causing corona.
Op could you provide some evidence as to why I’m wrong please?
You feckin idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8185073/Theories-linking-coronavirus-5G-baseless-networks-say-mast-fire.html
That's the article I read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like a brain dump from a trump supporter...
- one of the most intelligent ones, they can read.
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
And these theories were shut down, but the weight of evidence and knowledge allowed for them to be proven correct. This is not the case in 99.009% of batshiiiiiiit crazy theories, and why the idea that they should all be treat with respect because the 0.001% should have been is monumentally stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn't stupid. Its spot on and scientific.
They should all be respected until disproven. There is no evidence that waves can create a virus so this theory is disproven and you are free to ridicule it.
However, that doesn't mean you should dismiss the next one out of hand. Only until its disproven either scientifically or via critical thought.
The world being round was a conspiracy theory for hundreds of years you know.
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She should be at home playing with Lego
https://youtu.be/PnZPHiSOP_0
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm really interested to hear what they claim the link is to be honest. That's the best way to either ponder or ridicule their idea.
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
who does the fact checking
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 7 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh sheet.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
please do try to respect the views of those that do.
———
Why should such absolute, batshiiiiiit craziness be respected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo & Copernicus suffered because of people like you.
Even if you think their idea is crazy, you should allow people to state their views and who knows, you can learn a thing or two from them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Care to explain why the laugh emoji?
Unless probably, you don't know anything about those 2 I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo and Capernicus were persecuted as they went against the church. Not remotely similar to crazy conspiracy theories made up by John the factory worker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A better way to put it would be thus:
Their theory was against the popular paradigm at the time.
Society then were intollerant of any views outside what was considered mainstream. Just like some posters on here who are often too quick to shoot down views/opinions that's not mainstream today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but then that would suggest that crazy stupid conspiracy theories should be debated and given time and respect, when in reality they should be laughed at and harshly put down so that gullible people don't latch on to them.
Having a different opinion is fine. Having a stupid crazy opinion is stupid and crazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, a lot didn't start with a crazy stupid theory. If they were a crazy stupid theory they wouldn't turn out factual.
This is just another line the idiots use to push their conspiracy and any idiots using this excuse are as bad as they are, as they allow it to happen and to grow.
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 16 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow.
comment by spyro-12 (U21947)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
who does the fact checking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on the theory I guess, it might be the government, health officials, or the scientific community. Though we should all be responsible for critiquing what we read online to some extent. It's just as easy to find genuine research as it is to read something on Facebook.
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by spyro-12 (U21947)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
who does the fact checking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on the theory I guess, it might be the government, health officials, or the scientific community. Though we should all be responsible for critiquing what we read online to some extent. It's just as easy to find genuine research as it is to read something on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Not only that but you're getting facts to form your own opinion rather than some other persons opinion who may be basing it on lies and misconceptions.
No, a lot didn't start with a crazy stupid theory. If they were a crazy stupid theory they wouldn't turn out factual.
-----
Easy to say that now when you already know the truth. The theory doesn't seem crazy to you now.
Take a look at Flat earthers. Take a look at the sky is fake people. They look crazy and insane.
Well, that's what Galileo looked like. The world is round was as crazy as can be at that time. Gravity had not been discovered, so if its round we should fall off the earth when we are at the bottom.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 minutes ago
No, a lot didn't start with a crazy stupid theory. If they were a crazy stupid theory they wouldn't turn out factual.
-----
Easy to say that now when you already know the truth. The theory doesn't seem crazy to you now.
Take a look at Flat earthers. Take a look at the sky is fake people. They look crazy and insane.
Well, that's what Galileo looked like. The world is round was as crazy as can be at that time. Gravity had not been discovered, so if its round we should fall off the earth when we are at the bottom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The earth was found to be round by Pythagoras in 500BC.
Sign in if you want to comment
5G & Corona virus conspiracy
Page 3 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
The funny thing is that you think you can have sensible debate with people that are willing to destroy 5g masts because they think it causes coronavirus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 5 seconds ago
The funny thing is that you think you can have sensible debate with people that are willing to destroy 5g masts because they think it causes coronavirus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you listen to their reason(s), then one can counter their reasoning with facts/science. That;s more likely to be productive than the opposite.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
please do try to respect the views of those that do.
———
Why should such absolute, batshiiiiiit craziness be respected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo & Copernicus suffered because of people like you.
Even if you think their idea is crazy, you should allow people to state their views and who knows, you can learn a thing or two from them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worst and most erroneous comment in JA606 history.
posted on 3/4/20
Hard line conspiracy theorists have no time for reason, facts and science. If they did they wouldn’t be conspiracy theorists.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
please do try to respect the views of those that do.
———
Why should such absolute, batshiiiiiit craziness be respected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo & Copernicus suffered because of people like you.
Even if you think their idea is crazy, you should allow people to state their views and who knows, you can learn a thing or two from them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Care to explain why the laugh emoji?
Unless probably, you don't know anything about those 2 I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo and Capernicus were persecuted as they went against the church. Not remotely similar to crazy conspiracy theories made up by John the factory worker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A better way to put it would be thus:
Their theory was against the popular paradigm at the time.
Society then were intollerant of any views outside what was considered mainstream. Just like some posters on here who are often too quick to shoot down views/opinions that's not mainstream today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but then that would suggest that crazy stupid conspiracy theories should be debated and given time and respect, when in reality they should be laughed at and harshly put down so that gullible people don't latch on to them.
Having a different opinion is fine. Having a stupid crazy opinion is stupid and crazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Hard line conspiracy theorists have no time for reason, facts and science. If they did they wouldn’t be conspiracy theorists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You might be correct.
But I still think it's better to listen to those with opposing views even if their views/opinion is absurd.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Greenwood FC (U11781)
posted 49 minutes ago
Btw OP, how does it feel backing a complete clown like Boris now after the absolute shiiitshow he's infested on this country with the handling of the virus eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect he feels really glad he didn’t back Corbyn because it would be far worse.
No matter how much you keep knocking the current Government you know fully well how bad the alternative was.
posted on 3/4/20
You would, you seem to possess so many.
posted on 3/4/20
They could melt the masts down and make ventilators out of them, how hard can it be?
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
posted on 3/4/20
And these theories were shut down, but the weight of evidence and knowledge allowed for them to be proven correct. This is not the case in 99.009% of batshiiiiiiit crazy theories, and why the idea that they should all be treat with respect because the 0.001% should have been is monumentally stupid.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 12 seconds ago
I think Aliens are causing corona.
Op could you provide some evidence as to why I’m wrong please?
You feckin idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8185073/Theories-linking-coronavirus-5G-baseless-networks-say-mast-fire.html
That's the article I read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like a brain dump from a trump supporter...
- one of the most intelligent ones, they can read.
posted on 3/4/20
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
And these theories were shut down, but the weight of evidence and knowledge allowed for them to be proven correct. This is not the case in 99.009% of batshiiiiiiit crazy theories, and why the idea that they should all be treat with respect because the 0.001% should have been is monumentally stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn't stupid. Its spot on and scientific.
They should all be respected until disproven. There is no evidence that waves can create a virus so this theory is disproven and you are free to ridicule it.
However, that doesn't mean you should dismiss the next one out of hand. Only until its disproven either scientifically or via critical thought.
The world being round was a conspiracy theory for hundreds of years you know.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She should be at home playing with Lego
https://youtu.be/PnZPHiSOP_0
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm really interested to hear what they claim the link is to be honest. That's the best way to either ponder or ridicule their idea.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
who does the fact checking
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 7 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh sheet.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
please do try to respect the views of those that do.
———
Why should such absolute, batshiiiiiit craziness be respected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo & Copernicus suffered because of people like you.
Even if you think their idea is crazy, you should allow people to state their views and who knows, you can learn a thing or two from them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Care to explain why the laugh emoji?
Unless probably, you don't know anything about those 2 I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Galileo and Capernicus were persecuted as they went against the church. Not remotely similar to crazy conspiracy theories made up by John the factory worker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A better way to put it would be thus:
Their theory was against the popular paradigm at the time.
Society then were intollerant of any views outside what was considered mainstream. Just like some posters on here who are often too quick to shoot down views/opinions that's not mainstream today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but then that would suggest that crazy stupid conspiracy theories should be debated and given time and respect, when in reality they should be laughed at and harshly put down so that gullible people don't latch on to them.
Having a different opinion is fine. Having a stupid crazy opinion is stupid and crazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, a lot didn't start with a crazy stupid theory. If they were a crazy stupid theory they wouldn't turn out factual.
This is just another line the idiots use to push their conspiracy and any idiots using this excuse are as bad as they are, as they allow it to happen and to grow.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 16 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/charliehtweets/status/1245722007947411458
This woman should be arrested for leaving the house for something non-essential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by spyro-12 (U21947)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
who does the fact checking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on the theory I guess, it might be the government, health officials, or the scientific community. Though we should all be responsible for critiquing what we read online to some extent. It's just as easy to find genuine research as it is to read something on Facebook.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by spyro-12 (U21947)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
Its a scienyific approach. The law of probability suggests that a small percentage of crazy stupid theories turn out to actually be factual. In fact, a lot of truths and facts throughout history started with a crazy stupid theory, only to be found to be factual.
If this had been the case and all theories are shut down and stopped from spreading like you say, all these facts would never have seen the light of day.
Is it better to have 1000 guilty people go free or one innocent person punished? Is it better to have 1000 crazy theories if one of them is right than to have no theories at all, in which case you have zero correct theories.
The qualification that the theory must not sound crazy and stupid from the very start is one that no conspiracy theory can meet, or will really struggle to meet.
----------------------------------------------------
Very well articulated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We articulated but flawed I feel.
The implication is that the crazy theories have no negative impact. If this were true I'd be right on board, however we only have to look at the anti-vax movement to see how very real damage can be done by crazy theories.
There's no need to 'shut down all theories' but it is only reasonable, considering the proliferation of them on the internet, to subject them to reasonable logical thought processes and some level of fact-checking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
who does the fact checking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on the theory I guess, it might be the government, health officials, or the scientific community. Though we should all be responsible for critiquing what we read online to some extent. It's just as easy to find genuine research as it is to read something on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Not only that but you're getting facts to form your own opinion rather than some other persons opinion who may be basing it on lies and misconceptions.
posted on 3/4/20
No, a lot didn't start with a crazy stupid theory. If they were a crazy stupid theory they wouldn't turn out factual.
-----
Easy to say that now when you already know the truth. The theory doesn't seem crazy to you now.
Take a look at Flat earthers. Take a look at the sky is fake people. They look crazy and insane.
Well, that's what Galileo looked like. The world is round was as crazy as can be at that time. Gravity had not been discovered, so if its round we should fall off the earth when we are at the bottom.
posted on 3/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 minutes ago
No, a lot didn't start with a crazy stupid theory. If they were a crazy stupid theory they wouldn't turn out factual.
-----
Easy to say that now when you already know the truth. The theory doesn't seem crazy to you now.
Take a look at Flat earthers. Take a look at the sky is fake people. They look crazy and insane.
Well, that's what Galileo looked like. The world is round was as crazy as can be at that time. Gravity had not been discovered, so if its round we should fall off the earth when we are at the bottom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The earth was found to be round by Pythagoras in 500BC.
Page 3 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10