What was said is relevant POV.
Fans are using what's happening as a security blanket. To justify ignoring an achievement. Possibly as payment for what was said before, after what a club went through.
This is an important season. 9IAR, and no bhoy or ghirl will want any ambiguity.
There is no asterisk on any other titles, despite some finger pointing and calls for this.
Only one vocal section want to tarnish and cheapen the achievement.
This is nothing more than a ploy to derail a chance of 10IAR.
Cheesy says Ranger instead of Rangers and thier instead of their
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 23 minutes ago
Cheesy says Ranger instead of Rangers and thier instead of their
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor show for a lawyer/judge.
comment by atheist (U2783)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 23 minutes ago
Cheesy says Ranger instead of Rangers and thier instead of their
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor show for a lawyer/judge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
Null n void it all you want.... we'll still do TIAR. Our dominance will continue for the foreseeable future.
You can't do 10IAR now
After this season, you'll have won 8.5IAR, so can only win 9.5IAR or 10.5IAR, unless you are awarded another one somehow
As for Stubbs point, and the whole issue of the "EBT cheating"
It's all assumption...in that if we didn't sign X player we would not have won Y trophy
There is absolutely no way to prove that we would not have won those league titles without those players, that is why they were never stripped...it is highly likely that we would not have amassed the same number of points, but it cannot be proven it is just assumed
In that vein, this situation is the exact opposite
There is no way to prove that Celtic would go on to win the league this season....it is highly likely that they would, but it cannot be proven, it can only be assumed, so from that point of view, it should not be awarded
comment by council bin man (U21986)
posted 5 hours, 54 minutes ago
What was said is relevant POV.
Fans are using what's happening as a security blanket. To justify ignoring an achievement. Possibly as payment for what was said before, after what a club went through.
This is an important season. 9IAR, and no bhoy or ghirl will want any ambiguity.
There is no asterisk on any other titles, despite some finger pointing and calls for this.
Only one vocal section want to tarnish and cheapen the achievement.
This is nothing more than a ploy to derail a chance of 10IAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least there’s one relevant POV on these forums then.
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 2 minutes ago
RU OK babez? PM me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can we start a new clique?
A clique that never meets, and pressures people into making sure they don’t ever meet?!
https://youtu.be/nIhlfyEyFUQ
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 30 minutes ago
As for Stubbs point, and the whole issue of the "EBT cheating"
It's all assumption...in that if we didn't sign X player we would not have won Y trophy
There is absolutely no way to prove that we would not have won those league titles without those players, that is why they were never stripped...it is highly likely that we would not have amassed the same number of points, but it cannot be proven it is just assumed
In that vein, this situation is the exact opposite
There is no way to prove that Celtic would go on to win the league this season....it is highly likely that they would, but it cannot be proven, it can only be assumed, so from that point of view, it should not be awarded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you couldnt have signed those players as your club couldnt afford it. Hence the reason you went bust chasing pur shadow.
Gotta applause Mick for his 'thiers' in the OP title..
And putting 'titles' in just to coax out the strip the titties thing.
What a guy!
I don't get caught up usually in these pea-shooter episodes.
But I seem to remember some wigged person saying summat about this
had given an 'Undoubted & unfair sporting advantage'.
No comparison with the pandemic situ.
Celtic have lost loads in the present scenario.
We were scoring for fun hitting average 4+ goals per game.
Rangers were getting beat affa relegation fodder.
Would have sewn up the title weeks ago.
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 28 minutes ago
https://youtu.be/nIhlfyEyFUQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like the kind of folk we want and need.
I’m in!
Well you can fvk off for starters.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 25 minutes ago
Well you can fvk off for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pfft.
Fvck you. Cliquey bastirt.
I applied for membership 2012.
Not got back to me yet - they must be awfa busy.
Heading off now mate early jump.
Cheesy, if you take the core of a team away, the performance always drops. If you remove a key player you can and will affect results. See Gers results when Alfie was sidelined. A talisman, similar to the pros bought with EBT money in the period referenced.
If Gers big players weren't purchased it is common sense results would be different. Points totals would undoubtedly be lower. Look how Larson's return to the Celtic team changed our fortunes. See the difference Griffith's goals have had or Edouards as examples. All three in different seasons positively increasing Celtic's points totals. Without these three Celtic's success might be a little different, no?
Only Rangers fans believe their club didn't benefit from EBTs and the players they bought.
comment by council bin man (U21986)
posted 13 minutes ago
Cheesy, if you take the core of a team away, the performance always drops. If you remove a key player you can and will affect results. See Gers results when Alfie was sidelined. A talisman, similar to the pros bought with EBT money in the period referenced.
If Gers big players weren't purchased it is common sense results would be different. Points totals would undoubtedly be lower. Look how Larson's return to the Celtic team changed our fortunes. See the difference Griffith's goals have had or Edouards as examples. All three in different seasons positively increasing Celtic's points totals. Without these three Celtic's success might be a little different, no?
Only Rangers fans believe their club didn't benefit from EBTs and the players they bought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do know that Celtic used EBTs, surely?
They had players utilising them who played for Celtic?
Sure - they paid the money back, but those players were still at one time, on a pitch, playing competitive matches.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Cheesy (U14278)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
No we didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We did.
One player as I recall; not that it makes it right.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
You can't do 10IAR now
After this season, you'll have won 8.5IAR, so can only win 9.5IAR or 10.5IAR, unless you are awarded another one somehow
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 n half, 11 n half...who gives a kcuf.
Sign in if you want to comment
Stubbs warns ranger could lose thier titles
Page 2 of 3
posted on 3/5/20
What was said is relevant POV.
Fans are using what's happening as a security blanket. To justify ignoring an achievement. Possibly as payment for what was said before, after what a club went through.
This is an important season. 9IAR, and no bhoy or ghirl will want any ambiguity.
There is no asterisk on any other titles, despite some finger pointing and calls for this.
Only one vocal section want to tarnish and cheapen the achievement.
This is nothing more than a ploy to derail a chance of 10IAR.
posted on 3/5/20
Cheesy says Ranger instead of Rangers and thier instead of their
posted on 3/5/20
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 23 minutes ago
Cheesy says Ranger instead of Rangers and thier instead of their
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor show for a lawyer/judge.
posted on 3/5/20
comment by atheist (U2783)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 23 minutes ago
Cheesy says Ranger instead of Rangers and thier instead of their
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor show for a lawyer/judge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
posted on 3/5/20
Null n void it all you want.... we'll still do TIAR. Our dominance will continue for the foreseeable future.
posted on 3/5/20
You can't do 10IAR now
After this season, you'll have won 8.5IAR, so can only win 9.5IAR or 10.5IAR, unless you are awarded another one somehow
posted on 3/5/20
As for Stubbs point, and the whole issue of the "EBT cheating"
It's all assumption...in that if we didn't sign X player we would not have won Y trophy
There is absolutely no way to prove that we would not have won those league titles without those players, that is why they were never stripped...it is highly likely that we would not have amassed the same number of points, but it cannot be proven it is just assumed
In that vein, this situation is the exact opposite
There is no way to prove that Celtic would go on to win the league this season....it is highly likely that they would, but it cannot be proven, it can only be assumed, so from that point of view, it should not be awarded
posted on 3/5/20
comment by council bin man (U21986)
posted 5 hours, 54 minutes ago
What was said is relevant POV.
Fans are using what's happening as a security blanket. To justify ignoring an achievement. Possibly as payment for what was said before, after what a club went through.
This is an important season. 9IAR, and no bhoy or ghirl will want any ambiguity.
There is no asterisk on any other titles, despite some finger pointing and calls for this.
Only one vocal section want to tarnish and cheapen the achievement.
This is nothing more than a ploy to derail a chance of 10IAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least there’s one relevant POV on these forums then.
posted on 3/5/20
RU OK babez? PM me.
posted on 3/5/20
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 2 minutes ago
RU OK babez? PM me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can we start a new clique?
A clique that never meets, and pressures people into making sure they don’t ever meet?!
posted on 3/5/20
https://youtu.be/nIhlfyEyFUQ
posted on 3/5/20
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 30 minutes ago
As for Stubbs point, and the whole issue of the "EBT cheating"
It's all assumption...in that if we didn't sign X player we would not have won Y trophy
There is absolutely no way to prove that we would not have won those league titles without those players, that is why they were never stripped...it is highly likely that we would not have amassed the same number of points, but it cannot be proven it is just assumed
In that vein, this situation is the exact opposite
There is no way to prove that Celtic would go on to win the league this season....it is highly likely that they would, but it cannot be proven, it can only be assumed, so from that point of view, it should not be awarded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you couldnt have signed those players as your club couldnt afford it. Hence the reason you went bust chasing pur shadow.
posted on 3/5/20
Gotta applause Mick for his 'thiers' in the OP title..
And putting 'titles' in just to coax out the strip the titties thing.
What a guy!
posted on 3/5/20
Soz forgot
posted on 3/5/20
I don't get caught up usually in these pea-shooter episodes.
But I seem to remember some wigged person saying summat about this
had given an 'Undoubted & unfair sporting advantage'.
No comparison with the pandemic situ.
Celtic have lost loads in the present scenario.
We were scoring for fun hitting average 4+ goals per game.
Rangers were getting beat affa relegation fodder.
Would have sewn up the title weeks ago.
posted on 3/5/20
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 28 minutes ago
https://youtu.be/nIhlfyEyFUQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like the kind of folk we want and need.
I’m in!
posted on 3/5/20
Well you can fvk off for starters.
posted on 3/5/20
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 25 minutes ago
Well you can fvk off for starters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pfft.
Fvck you. Cliquey bastirt.
posted on 3/5/20
I applied for membership 2012.
Not got back to me yet - they must be awfa busy.
Heading off now mate early jump.
posted on 4/5/20
Cheesy, if you take the core of a team away, the performance always drops. If you remove a key player you can and will affect results. See Gers results when Alfie was sidelined. A talisman, similar to the pros bought with EBT money in the period referenced.
If Gers big players weren't purchased it is common sense results would be different. Points totals would undoubtedly be lower. Look how Larson's return to the Celtic team changed our fortunes. See the difference Griffith's goals have had or Edouards as examples. All three in different seasons positively increasing Celtic's points totals. Without these three Celtic's success might be a little different, no?
Only Rangers fans believe their club didn't benefit from EBTs and the players they bought.
posted on 4/5/20
comment by council bin man (U21986)
posted 13 minutes ago
Cheesy, if you take the core of a team away, the performance always drops. If you remove a key player you can and will affect results. See Gers results when Alfie was sidelined. A talisman, similar to the pros bought with EBT money in the period referenced.
If Gers big players weren't purchased it is common sense results would be different. Points totals would undoubtedly be lower. Look how Larson's return to the Celtic team changed our fortunes. See the difference Griffith's goals have had or Edouards as examples. All three in different seasons positively increasing Celtic's points totals. Without these three Celtic's success might be a little different, no?
Only Rangers fans believe their club didn't benefit from EBTs and the players they bought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do know that Celtic used EBTs, surely?
They had players utilising them who played for Celtic?
Sure - they paid the money back, but those players were still at one time, on a pitch, playing competitive matches.
posted on 4/5/20
No we didnt
posted on 4/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/5/20
comment by Cheesy (U14278)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
No we didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We did.
One player as I recall; not that it makes it right.
posted on 4/5/20
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
You can't do 10IAR now
After this season, you'll have won 8.5IAR, so can only win 9.5IAR or 10.5IAR, unless you are awarded another one somehow
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 n half, 11 n half...who gives a kcuf.
Page 2 of 3