I`d imagine they are still working on the wording. They have to be very careful with the accusations, to avoid getting sued, if they can`t back it up with real proof. Probably lawyers working on it

i'm just gna answer the same on both articles

see tbh, this is classic rangers these days.

still haven't finished compiling their evidence despite wanting people suspended.

If they have something big than fair enough, but the way its playing out so far it doesn't look like it.

comment by Why the pallaver (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
I`d imagine they are still working on the wording. They have to be very careful with the accusations, to avoid getting sued, if they can`t back it up with real proof. Probably lawyers working on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've had weeks to get the wording correct

I don't remember Rangers ever saying it would be supplied today.

Only this week??

Ive not followed it that closely mind you.

And its probably nothing significant anyway.

what happens if Rangers actually come out with something that shows that the SPFL have been blatantly cheating

is there a chance that may happen?

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 56 seconds ago
I don't remember Rangers ever saying it would be supplied today.

Only this week??

Ive not followed it that closely mind you.

And its probably nothing significant anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't say I'm too clued up on it myself.

The longer they leave it, the worse it looks. If the evidence is so damning, it will require plenty of time to consider/examine it.. so why are Rangers intent on reducing the time frame?

They pushed for the EGM next Tuesday, and now they're saying they still haven't got their evidence together.

Whether they have evidence or not, this is another prime example of Rangers amateurishness and incompetence.

Rangers under King and Trainor seemed more rational, if this is Parks and the northern Irish guy god help us

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 2 minutes ago
what happens if Rangers actually come out with something that shows that the SPFL have been blatantly cheating

is there a chance that may happen?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's always a chance that might happen.

I don't believe that NOTHING would have leaked in the past couple of weeks given the fact Rangers can never keep anything quiet for longer than 5 mins.

They might be being bloody minded and making a point because the material supplied to clubs for the disputed vote was only provided at short notice?

Anyway, fullness of time....

According to sources on Saturday from a few clubs they told clubs the evidence would be with them by COB Tuesday.

Apparently they've now asked for another 48 hours which seems odd but this whole episode has been odd

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 19 seconds ago
They might be being bloody minded and making a point because the material supplied to clubs for the disputed vote was only provided at short notice?

Anyway, fullness of time....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't ideal but look at the circumstances surrounding the vote.

At the time, it wasn't clear at all if the season would finish or what would happen next season etc. Even less info than we have now. Coupled with Rangers insistence (through their statements) that money HAD to be freed up pronto.. then it was always going to be short notice.

I think Rangers will have something but whether it's enough to warrant a full-scale independent investigation is another thing.

apparently Doncaster tore a few arguments to shred over the weekend regarding advanced payments and loans

then Alex Rae came on clyde last night demanding to know why teams were getting advanced payments as they were the same as loans

he was put in his place in less than 20 seconds by 90 year old Hugh Keevins

all seems a tad desperate

comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Why the pallaver (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
I`d imagine they are still working on the wording. They have to be very careful with the accusations, to avoid getting sued, if they can`t back it up with real proof. Probably lawyers working on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've had weeks to get the wording correct
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I know. Still possible though. Maybe for a while they thought it wouldn`t come to this, I don`t know. None of us knows.

Maybe there's a smoking crossbow

Doncaster actually came across well in his interviews over the weekend, he was clear and articulate in the payments and proved once again that Ann Budge was wrong.

She's been shown up the past few months, she's a shambles.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Actually think they have a bust flush all the ammo they thought they had has been addressed

comment by Why the pallaver (U10168)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Why the pallaver (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
I`d imagine they are still working on the wording. They have to be very careful with the accusations, to avoid getting sued, if they can`t back it up with real proof. Probably lawyers working on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They've had weeks to get the wording correct
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I know. Still possible though. Maybe for a while they thought it wouldn`t come to this, I don`t know. None of us knows.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/imageserver/image/%2Fmethode%2Fsundaytimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F8692ee12-086a-11ea-b74d-6ffd84f3cc00.jpg?crop=2667%2C1500%2C0%2C0&resize=1180

comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this seriously) (U1850)
posted 53 seconds ago

What’s out there already warrants an investigation. The vote is and was a shambles


but hasn't there been an investigation by Deloitte?

If they didn't think it would come to this pallaver, then why demand an EGM and call for the heads of Doncaster et al.

They thought they could bluster their way to getting what they wanted.. and now are having to concoct some damning dossier based on possible bad information and wishful thinking.

The reason it's probably taking them so long to release it is that they're no doubt attempting to word a trivial matter into a major issue.

Traynor will be there with his thesaurus hoping he can throw people off by using archaic and long words

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 30 seconds ago

Traynor will be there with his thesaurus hoping he can throw people off by using archaic and long words
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be concomitant with the man.

comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this seriously) (U1850)
posted 14 seconds ago
The reason it's probably taking them so long to release it is that they're no doubt attempting to word a trivial matter into a major issue.

Do you have inside knowledge or are you just being scarfy ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it scarfy to wonder why it's taking them so long when the evidence they have is so damning to call for sackings?

Why not let the evidence speak for itself?