Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 26 seconds ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another one of those that engages in certain debates proclaiming neutrality without actually ever being neutral, not even once.
Defended for saying the league is corrupt as an entity but it wasn't when Chelsea and United were winning it.
thor i'm just saying that baz said he always said the pl was corrupt, even when man utd were winning titles.
you said got a link? and then said he had to prove he said it when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
that why i said you should drop it. i don't think the pl is corrupt myself.
when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
-----
How would I be able to do this?
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 5 minutes ago
thor i'm just saying that baz said he always said the pl was corrupt, even when man utd were winning titles.
you said got a link? and then said he had to prove he said it when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
that why i said you should drop it. i don't think the pl is corrupt myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where do we post every comment Baz has ever made to prove he didn’t say the PL is corrupt when United were winning?
Asking for a friend
The reason I pointed it out is because its a theme. Ole Deluded Baz is always talking about corruption in the league in recent times and linking it to Liverpool.
He has repeatedly and bitterly accused Liverpool of bribing refs and and paying off VAR and even made a "Jurgen Corrupt" article, among others etc. Its a theme and a trend. He won't deny this because he knows its true but I could prove that he does this by providing links and quotes.
Now he says he is "always saying the league is corrupt". If he ever said it one time when United were on top it'd be easy to find.
Does anyone on this thread actually believe that Ole used to say the league is a corrupt entity when Fergie was in charge? Give your head a wobble.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 26 seconds ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another one of those that engages in certain debates proclaiming neutrality without actually ever being neutral, not even once.
Defended for saying the league is corrupt as an entity but it wasn't when Chelsea and United were winning it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know that I only engage in certain debates if you only became a member 11 days ago In which I’ve rarely been on the site. That would throw your “numberism” comment out the window as you are indeed a returning banned member.
Also surely everyone only engages in certain subjects on here, nobody could have the time to post on every article.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 23 minutes ago
when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
-----
How would I be able to do this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is for you to find out, your the one who said it, it’s not up to anyone else to prove your point
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have said it in the first place unless I have evidence. Of course you can prove it you just can’t be bothered to go through his posts which is what it would take. You’re not quite getting it, maybe a bit slow upstairs
How do you know that I only engage in certain debates if you only became a member 11 days ago In which I’ve rarely been on the site. That would throw your “numberism” comment out the window as you are indeed a returning banned member.
------
No it wouldn't, the way you make assumptions would be a bad omen in an IQ test. Some posters have their accounts closed, you never know.
Judging people on their previous is backwards and primitive and damaging to the site. The moment you see a 20+ user name your mentality changes as you assume they're no good, thus destroying debate.
No it doesn’t, I give them a fair chance each and every time only to be proven wrong. They are in every one of my experiences returning banned wums. Waiting for the day to be proved otherwise.
And you talking about IQ...I wouldn’t go there
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have said it in the first place unless I have evidence.
-------
Its impossible to have evidence of soemyhi g that didn't happen. So the only way I can say something didn't exist is if I have evidence that it doesn't exist, even though its impossible to have evidence of something that didn't exist?
Are you aware of what were talking about here mate?
Ive just been through all of Bazs post and he never called the league corrupt when united were on top. Not even once
Of course you can prove it you just can’t be bothered to go through his posts which is what it would take. You’re not quite getting it, maybe a bit slow upstairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, let me simplify this for you.
I just went through Oles profile and could not find a single instant of him saying the league is corrupt when United were on top.
I've found instances of him saying the league is corrupt in the last year or so. None before that.
By your logic this is conclusive proof that its never happened.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Baz is a massive WUM who’s been crying about VAR, Liverpool & refs being corrupt all season, but never the PL itself. Weird. Yet it’s reasonable to expect he definitely said it was corrupt when United were winning the league
Who are you to judge who is/isn’t a poor poster
If you don’t like what I have to say don’t respond. Maybe stick to the Chelsea board if you aren’t capable of discussing with fans of other clubs. You can give each other a reach around and tell each other what good posters you are
“The accuser must provide evidence”
Still not grasping the fact you can’t prove something didn’t happen. For a supposed good poster on the site you still won’t acknowledge this at all.
Had you down as more intelligent than this.
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 1 minute ago
Ive just been through all of Bazs post and he never called the league corrupt when united were on top. Not even once
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me too, but many times in the last year or so he has said the league is corrupt and Liverpool have bought refs and VAR. I am able to find those but can't find any where he said it while Fergie was at United. Why would that be the case?
Rumbled. Meanwhile other caaants don't want this to be true, the reason for which I don't know but we can all guess.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 5 minutes ago
And you talking about IQ...I wouldn’t go there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you wouldn't, you're smart enough to know that at least.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have said it in the first place unless I have evidence. Of course you can prove it you just can’t be bothered to go through his posts which is what it would take. You’re not quite getting it, maybe a bit slow upstairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Behave
How many posts, all of them, a sample of 100 chosen at random?
Christ
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 1 minute ago
Ive just been through all of Bazs post and he never called the league corrupt when united were on top. Not even once
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me too, but many times in the last year or so he has said the league is corrupt and Liverpool have bought refs and VAR. I am able to find those but can't find any where he said it while Fergie was at United. Why would that be the case?
Rumbled. Meanwhile other caaants don't want this to be true, the reason for which I don't know but we can all guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rumbled, yes you have been.
What year did Saf leave utd? When were we last on top?
And....What year did I join: Ole-Dirty-Baztard(U19119)
member since: 19 January 2014
So looks like you haven’t been through many posts at all!
I’ve definitely said the pl is corrupt (sold its soul for cash I’ve used a lot) in that time from 14-now.
This thread The amount of searching, rabid frothing and collective insanity we’ve seen from the pool fans particularly Faanny is hilarious I don’t mind mamba, even though he’s a bit dim, injuredlikeowen or whatever he was called had the right idea.
Good to see other fans with sense on here, Lexington and nick etc..refreshing contrast to the madness that infects pool supporters Nice to see GTWI0.5Times giving it his stock botnet like auto posts too.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
“ I’ve definitely said the pl is corrupt (sold its soul for cash I’ve used a lot) in that time from 14-now”
You won’t t have trouble finding a quote then will you.
I call you talking shiite, again, prove me wrong.
Insanity? Still lying
Sign in if you want to comment
Players
Page 7 of 28
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 21/5/20
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
posted on 21/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 26 seconds ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another one of those that engages in certain debates proclaiming neutrality without actually ever being neutral, not even once.
Defended for saying the league is corrupt as an entity but it wasn't when Chelsea and United were winning it.
posted on 21/5/20
thor i'm just saying that baz said he always said the pl was corrupt, even when man utd were winning titles.
you said got a link? and then said he had to prove he said it when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
that why i said you should drop it. i don't think the pl is corrupt myself.
posted on 21/5/20
when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
-----
How would I be able to do this?
posted on 21/5/20
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 5 minutes ago
thor i'm just saying that baz said he always said the pl was corrupt, even when man utd were winning titles.
you said got a link? and then said he had to prove he said it when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
that why i said you should drop it. i don't think the pl is corrupt myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where do we post every comment Baz has ever made to prove he didn’t say the PL is corrupt when United were winning?
Asking for a friend
posted on 21/5/20
The reason I pointed it out is because its a theme. Ole Deluded Baz is always talking about corruption in the league in recent times and linking it to Liverpool.
He has repeatedly and bitterly accused Liverpool of bribing refs and and paying off VAR and even made a "Jurgen Corrupt" article, among others etc. Its a theme and a trend. He won't deny this because he knows its true but I could prove that he does this by providing links and quotes.
Now he says he is "always saying the league is corrupt". If he ever said it one time when United were on top it'd be easy to find.
Does anyone on this thread actually believe that Ole used to say the league is a corrupt entity when Fergie was in charge? Give your head a wobble.
posted on 21/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 26 seconds ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another one of those that engages in certain debates proclaiming neutrality without actually ever being neutral, not even once.
Defended for saying the league is corrupt as an entity but it wasn't when Chelsea and United were winning it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know that I only engage in certain debates if you only became a member 11 days ago In which I’ve rarely been on the site. That would throw your “numberism” comment out the window as you are indeed a returning banned member.
Also surely everyone only engages in certain subjects on here, nobody could have the time to post on every article.
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 23 minutes ago
when you have to prove he didn't say it as well.
-----
How would I be able to do this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is for you to find out, your the one who said it, it’s not up to anyone else to prove your point
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have said it in the first place unless I have evidence. Of course you can prove it you just can’t be bothered to go through his posts which is what it would take. You’re not quite getting it, maybe a bit slow upstairs
posted on 21/5/20
How do you know that I only engage in certain debates if you only became a member 11 days ago In which I’ve rarely been on the site. That would throw your “numberism” comment out the window as you are indeed a returning banned member.
------
No it wouldn't, the way you make assumptions would be a bad omen in an IQ test. Some posters have their accounts closed, you never know.
Judging people on their previous is backwards and primitive and damaging to the site. The moment you see a 20+ user name your mentality changes as you assume they're no good, thus destroying debate.
posted on 21/5/20
No it doesn’t, I give them a fair chance each and every time only to be proven wrong. They are in every one of my experiences returning banned wums. Waiting for the day to be proved otherwise.
posted on 21/5/20
And you talking about IQ...I wouldn’t go there
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have said it in the first place unless I have evidence.
-------
Its impossible to have evidence of soemyhi g that didn't happen. So the only way I can say something didn't exist is if I have evidence that it doesn't exist, even though its impossible to have evidence of something that didn't exist?
Are you aware of what were talking about here mate?
posted on 21/5/20
Ive just been through all of Bazs post and he never called the league corrupt when united were on top. Not even once
posted on 21/5/20
Of course you can prove it you just can’t be bothered to go through his posts which is what it would take. You’re not quite getting it, maybe a bit slow upstairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, let me simplify this for you.
I just went through Oles profile and could not find a single instant of him saying the league is corrupt when United were on top.
I've found instances of him saying the league is corrupt in the last year or so. None before that.
By your logic this is conclusive proof that its never happened.
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Baz is a massive WUM who’s been crying about VAR, Liverpool & refs being corrupt all season, but never the PL itself. Weird. Yet it’s reasonable to expect he definitely said it was corrupt when United were winning the league
Who are you to judge who is/isn’t a poor poster
If you don’t like what I have to say don’t respond. Maybe stick to the Chelsea board if you aren’t capable of discussing with fans of other clubs. You can give each other a reach around and tell each other what good posters you are
“The accuser must provide evidence”
Still not grasping the fact you can’t prove something didn’t happen. For a supposed good poster on the site you still won’t acknowledge this at all.
Had you down as more intelligent than this.
posted on 21/5/20
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 1 minute ago
Ive just been through all of Bazs post and he never called the league corrupt when united were on top. Not even once
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me too, but many times in the last year or so he has said the league is corrupt and Liverpool have bought refs and VAR. I am able to find those but can't find any where he said it while Fergie was at United. Why would that be the case?
Rumbled. Meanwhile other caaants don't want this to be true, the reason for which I don't know but we can all guess.
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 5 minutes ago
And you talking about IQ...I wouldn’t go there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you wouldn't, you're smart enough to know that at least.
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 37 minutes ago
Nick branding people a WUM whilst defending Baz has obviously never seen him post before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I have not, and know you are a poor poster so can only judge on what I know. Plus here Thor has accused him of not saying the pl has always been corrupt, it’s not for baz to prove otherwise. The accuser must provide evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you slow or something? Its impossible to prove a negative. How many times must you be told? How would you prove it if it was you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have said it in the first place unless I have evidence. Of course you can prove it you just can’t be bothered to go through his posts which is what it would take. You’re not quite getting it, maybe a bit slow upstairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Behave
How many posts, all of them, a sample of 100 chosen at random?
Christ
posted on 21/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 1 minute ago
Ive just been through all of Bazs post and he never called the league corrupt when united were on top. Not even once
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me too, but many times in the last year or so he has said the league is corrupt and Liverpool have bought refs and VAR. I am able to find those but can't find any where he said it while Fergie was at United. Why would that be the case?
Rumbled. Meanwhile other caaants don't want this to be true, the reason for which I don't know but we can all guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rumbled, yes you have been.
What year did Saf leave utd? When were we last on top?
And....What year did I join: Ole-Dirty-Baztard(U19119)
member since: 19 January 2014
So looks like you haven’t been through many posts at all!
I’ve definitely said the pl is corrupt (sold its soul for cash I’ve used a lot) in that time from 14-now.
This thread The amount of searching, rabid frothing and collective insanity we’ve seen from the pool fans particularly Faanny is hilarious I don’t mind mamba, even though he’s a bit dim, injuredlikeowen or whatever he was called had the right idea.
Good to see other fans with sense on here, Lexington and nick etc..refreshing contrast to the madness that infects pool supporters Nice to see GTWI0.5Times giving it his stock botnet like auto posts too.
posted on 21/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/5/20
“ I’ve definitely said the pl is corrupt (sold its soul for cash I’ve used a lot) in that time from 14-now”
You won’t t have trouble finding a quote then will you.
I call you talking shiite, again, prove me wrong.
Insanity? Still lying
Page 7 of 28
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12