If England could catch Broad would have at least another 70 wickets.. the amount of catches that have been dropped off him as been ridiculous
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 10 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Sandy actually Geoff Boycott?
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 34 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said the same earlier, got told he was entitled to his say, hes found a hiding place here
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 58 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er no. You seem to know everything and nothing about me. You like a lot of others think because I put a view that may not be what everybody wants to hear, I am on the WUM.
You couldn`t be further wrong pal.
Mind you with a user name like Amanda Hugginkiss, why would I not think you are a tad dopey.
comment by Scouse (U9675)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 10 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Sandy actually Geoff Boycott?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mate, even I used to think Geoff Boycott was not that entertaining, but he did know how to grind out an innings, something the modern players just cannot do.
England v Ireland ODI anyone?
7/2. Great start for England.
Campher has such an odd stance at the crease. When he taps his bat down it's almost horizontal
Ok 9 run partnership this is getting ridiculous now.
Roy on Rashid...
"He's been borderline unplayable in the nets. He's bowling so much quicker and with his variations it's so hard to pick. He's got no shoulder issues at the moment and he's bowling like a genius at the moment."
Need a wicket, desperately.
Rashid is a very good one day bowler to be fair.
Phenom, we need you, say it.
if we dont get them out for under 100 bring back bayliss
Sign in if you want to comment
England v West Indies: 3 closed-door Tests
Page 59 of 64
60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64
posted on 28/7/20
If England could catch Broad would have at least another 70 wickets.. the amount of catches that have been dropped off him as been ridiculous
posted on 28/7/20
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 10 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Sandy actually Geoff Boycott?
posted on 28/7/20
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 34 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said the same earlier, got told he was entitled to his say, hes found a hiding place here
posted on 28/7/20
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 58 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er no. You seem to know everything and nothing about me. You like a lot of others think because I put a view that may not be what everybody wants to hear, I am on the WUM.
You couldn`t be further wrong pal.
Mind you with a user name like Amanda Hugginkiss, why would I not think you are a tad dopey.
posted on 28/7/20
comment by Scouse (U9675)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 10 minutes ago
The error you've made here, people, is taking Sandy seriously. He's very clearly on the wum. His modus operandi:
1. Post idiotic and inflammatory comment (pretty much word for word the same as every previous post by him on the cricket board)
2. Get a reaction
3. Goad the person who reacted into "insulting" him (NB. the term "insult" has a very loose definition so it's a low bar)
4. Say "You insulted me so you've lost credibility"
5. Sit at his keyboard feeling smug that he won an argument so he's achieved something worthwhile with his day.
The craving for attention is really quite desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Sandy actually Geoff Boycott?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mate, even I used to think Geoff Boycott was not that entertaining, but he did know how to grind out an innings, something the modern players just cannot do.
posted on 29/7/20
W.G Grace?
posted on 30/7/20
England v Ireland ODI anyone?
posted on 30/7/20
Need a wicket.
posted on 30/7/20
7/2. Great start for England.
posted on 30/7/20
need a wicket
posted on 30/7/20
Phenom strikes.
posted on 30/7/20
28/5
posted on 30/7/20
need a wicket
posted on 30/7/20
Campher has such an odd stance at the crease. When he taps his bat down it's almost horizontal
posted on 30/7/20
wtf they got another run
posted on 30/7/20
Ok 9 run partnership this is getting ridiculous now.
posted on 30/7/20
Need a wicket.
posted on 30/7/20
leaking boundaries now
posted on 30/7/20
Roy on Rashid...
"He's been borderline unplayable in the nets. He's bowling so much quicker and with his variations it's so hard to pick. He's got no shoulder issues at the moment and he's bowling like a genius at the moment."
posted on 30/7/20
Need a wicket, desperately.
posted on 30/7/20
Rashid is a very good one day bowler to be fair.
Phenom, we need you, say it.
posted on 30/7/20
And Gone.
posted on 30/7/20
need a wicket
posted on 30/7/20
posted on 30/7/20
if we dont get them out for under 100 bring back bayliss
Page 59 of 64
60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64