comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 30 seconds ago
They’ll be like a roaming squad getting stuck in where required.
I defo think it will kick off though Winston and what we’ll see if videos from both sides saying the other started it.
As you say does no good for anyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course.
The decision for 'football fans' to go into London is a terrible one and given what I've seen of this week and last week, it really is just an excuse to go in and shout abuse, and to cause violence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds just like what's been happening over the last week or more to me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except for the vast majority it isn’t.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 32 seconds ago
62 injured police by the left, lets see how many the 'right' cause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a facking competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those making out the far right are worse than the cants who attacked the police last weekend are turning it into a competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem determined to defend one side - so you're doing the same.
Fact is that these people will do nothing but add to the violence and in many cases, probably start it - based on what we have seen.
Underlying racism amongst them, no question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How can they add to the violence when you are claiming the protesters are peaceful.
Have a good think about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ones in my example were peaceful.
Try reading what I am saying ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So there has been violence by these protesters from BLM and the far left then.
I thought by reading your description of them they all turned up on unicorns holding big fluffy puppies in their arms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you're desperate to see a narrative that isn't there because you're biased, clearly.
Try reading slowly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing.
You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans,despite the fact that violence has already taken place by the protesters already.
You are accusing others of being on one side of the argument when in fact you are doing the exact same thing.
What a hypocrite
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 47 seconds ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect the majority don't really care.
How many people knew about that statue before this week?
Now it's so important that we need to protest about it's removal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very many know anything about the "statues" they are coming to London to protect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Winston Churchill is about all the info they can muster.
The whole concept of statues is ridiculous anyway. Take them all down. People talk about erasing history but the Hitler one was taken down and I’m fairly certain people know who he was
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Colemanballs (U22246)
"You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing."
Please do show me where I've done that?
Good luck with that.
"You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans"
Again, where have I said it's solely down to the football fans?
Good luck with that.
Come back when you can read.
dont erase are proud history just because some snowflakes are offended maybe time we bring back old ways if people arent going too behave maybe we had it right in the passed we won war's now everyones transgender trying too ban harry potter
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bristol protestors should be knighted
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bur there is an element of people seeing what they want to see.
Some see Churchill as a racist.
Some see Churchill as a war hero.
Both are true, but the individuals overriding perception is what differs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about the Colston statue? Is there a different perception of him aside from a slave trader? Yes he contributed millions to Bristol after the fact. That doesn’t make anything right.
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 3 minutes ago
Football fans on a football forum saying there is a connection between football fans and racism. 🤦♂️
How many people enjoy football? How many of those are racists? As a percentage?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't think there's a connection?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably no more than any other group. I'm ready to be corrected with figures. How many enjoy football? How many are racist?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As if there are confirmed figures.
Open your eyes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say official...
Shall we hazard a guess, maybe 10 million people in the UK enjoy football to a degree? How many are racists ooking for a fight?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did I say it was a majority? Or even a large proportion?
I'm saying there's a connection, and there is. Anyone who has spent any deal of time going to games can see it with their own eyes.
If you want actual figures then you're in the wrong place - there are none.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Colemanballs (U22246)
"You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing."
Please do show me where I've done that?
Good luck with that.
"You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans"
Again, where have I said it's solely down to the football fans?
Good luck with that.
Come back when you can read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read what you have typed and I stand by my claim that you are a hypocrite.
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, be careful about how closely you tie yourself to the law.
Laws change.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 47 seconds ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect the majority don't really care.
How many people knew about that statue before this week?
Now it's so important that we need to protest about it's removal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very many know anything about the "statues" they are coming to London to protect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Winston Churchill is about all the info they can muster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can just imagine some tattooed fookwit standing in front of the statue reciting his fight them on the beaches speech.
That is if the idiot can actually read
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Colemanballs (U22246)
"You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing."
Please do show me where I've done that?
Good luck with that.
"You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans"
Again, where have I said it's solely down to the football fans?
Good luck with that.
Come back when you can read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read what you have typed and I stand by my claim that you are a hypocrite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you clearly cannot read, because I've not said either of those things.
Perhaps best for you to find some toys to play with while the adults talk, because coming here and lying about things that have been said just so you can then cry about them doesn't achieve much.
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 4 minutes ago
The whole concept of statues is ridiculous anyway. Take them all down. People talk about erasing history but the Hitler one was taken down and I’m fairly certain people know who he was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Including Fergies at OT?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 47 seconds ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect the majority don't really care.
How many people knew about that statue before this week?
Now it's so important that we need to protest about it's removal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very many know anything about the "statues" they are coming to London to protect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Winston Churchill is about all the info they can muster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can just imagine some tattooed fookwit standing in front of the statue reciting his fight them on the beaches speech.
That is if the idiot can actually read
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It'd be laughable if it weren't so serious.
There called minorites for a reason we are the majority we won the election we won brexit we won the wars we voted for foreigners too LEAVE that doesnt make us racist that makes us correct as we are the MAJORITY
Just Shoot (U10408)
In my view, there's a higher degree of racism and violence in football groups than society as a whole, which i why I think there's a connection.
You can disagree all you like, but I live in North London and I see it, very clearly amongst the Spurs fans.
comment by Benjamin Kallman (U1734)
posted 5 seconds ago
There called minorites for a reason we are the majority we won the election we won brexit we won the wars we voted for foreigners too LEAVE that doesnt make us racist that makes us correct as we are the MAJORITY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote for Barry
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 4 minutes ago
The whole concept of statues is ridiculous anyway. Take them all down. People talk about erasing history but the Hitler one was taken down and I’m fairly certain people know who he was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Including Fergies at OT?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be clear, I’m not actually campaigning for an end to statues but if there was a world where statues were deemed to be taken down then fair enough, bring them all down 😂
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, be careful about how closely you tie yourself to the law.
Laws change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha, don't obey the law as it might change!?
More excuses for mob rule.
Sign in if you want to comment
Violence in London this weekend
Page 4 of 12
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 30 seconds ago
They’ll be like a roaming squad getting stuck in where required.
I defo think it will kick off though Winston and what we’ll see if videos from both sides saying the other started it.
As you say does no good for anyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course.
The decision for 'football fans' to go into London is a terrible one and given what I've seen of this week and last week, it really is just an excuse to go in and shout abuse, and to cause violence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds just like what's been happening over the last week or more to me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except for the vast majority it isn’t.
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 32 seconds ago
62 injured police by the left, lets see how many the 'right' cause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a facking competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those making out the far right are worse than the cants who attacked the police last weekend are turning it into a competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem determined to defend one side - so you're doing the same.
Fact is that these people will do nothing but add to the violence and in many cases, probably start it - based on what we have seen.
Underlying racism amongst them, no question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How can they add to the violence when you are claiming the protesters are peaceful.
Have a good think about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ones in my example were peaceful.
Try reading what I am saying ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So there has been violence by these protesters from BLM and the far left then.
I thought by reading your description of them they all turned up on unicorns holding big fluffy puppies in their arms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you're desperate to see a narrative that isn't there because you're biased, clearly.
Try reading slowly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing.
You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans,despite the fact that violence has already taken place by the protesters already.
You are accusing others of being on one side of the argument when in fact you are doing the exact same thing.
What a hypocrite
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 47 seconds ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect the majority don't really care.
How many people knew about that statue before this week?
Now it's so important that we need to protest about it's removal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very many know anything about the "statues" they are coming to London to protect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Winston Churchill is about all the info they can muster.
posted on 12/6/20
The whole concept of statues is ridiculous anyway. Take them all down. People talk about erasing history but the Hitler one was taken down and I’m fairly certain people know who he was
posted on 12/6/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/6/20
Colemanballs (U22246)
"You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing."
Please do show me where I've done that?
Good luck with that.
"You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans"
Again, where have I said it's solely down to the football fans?
Good luck with that.
Come back when you can read.
posted on 12/6/20
dont erase are proud history just because some snowflakes are offended maybe time we bring back old ways if people arent going too behave maybe we had it right in the passed we won war's now everyones transgender trying too ban harry potter
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
posted on 12/6/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/6/20
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bristol protestors should be knighted
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bur there is an element of people seeing what they want to see.
Some see Churchill as a racist.
Some see Churchill as a war hero.
Both are true, but the individuals overriding perception is what differs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about the Colston statue? Is there a different perception of him aside from a slave trader? Yes he contributed millions to Bristol after the fact. That doesn’t make anything right.
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 3 minutes ago
Football fans on a football forum saying there is a connection between football fans and racism. 🤦♂️
How many people enjoy football? How many of those are racists? As a percentage?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't think there's a connection?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably no more than any other group. I'm ready to be corrected with figures. How many enjoy football? How many are racist?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As if there are confirmed figures.
Open your eyes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say official...
Shall we hazard a guess, maybe 10 million people in the UK enjoy football to a degree? How many are racists ooking for a fight?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did I say it was a majority? Or even a large proportion?
I'm saying there's a connection, and there is. Anyone who has spent any deal of time going to games can see it with their own eyes.
If you want actual figures then you're in the wrong place - there are none.
posted on 12/6/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Colemanballs (U22246)
"You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing."
Please do show me where I've done that?
Good luck with that.
"You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans"
Again, where have I said it's solely down to the football fans?
Good luck with that.
Come back when you can read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read what you have typed and I stand by my claim that you are a hypocrite.
posted on 12/6/20
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, be careful about how closely you tie yourself to the law.
Laws change.
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 47 seconds ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect the majority don't really care.
How many people knew about that statue before this week?
Now it's so important that we need to protest about it's removal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very many know anything about the "statues" they are coming to London to protect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Winston Churchill is about all the info they can muster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can just imagine some tattooed fookwit standing in front of the statue reciting his fight them on the beaches speech.
That is if the idiot can actually read
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Colemanballs (U22246)
"You are defending the BLM and far left protesters on here and attacking the other mob who up to now have done nothing."
Please do show me where I've done that?
Good luck with that.
"You are assuming that violence will erupt and putting that solely down to the football fans"
Again, where have I said it's solely down to the football fans?
Good luck with that.
Come back when you can read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read what you have typed and I stand by my claim that you are a hypocrite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you clearly cannot read, because I've not said either of those things.
Perhaps best for you to find some toys to play with while the adults talk, because coming here and lying about things that have been said just so you can then cry about them doesn't achieve much.
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 4 minutes ago
The whole concept of statues is ridiculous anyway. Take them all down. People talk about erasing history but the Hitler one was taken down and I’m fairly certain people know who he was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Including Fergies at OT?
posted on 12/6/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 47 seconds ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect the majority don't really care.
How many people knew about that statue before this week?
Now it's so important that we need to protest about it's removal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very many know anything about the "statues" they are coming to London to protect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Winston Churchill is about all the info they can muster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can just imagine some tattooed fookwit standing in front of the statue reciting his fight them on the beaches speech.
That is if the idiot can actually read
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It'd be laughable if it weren't so serious.
posted on 12/6/20
There called minorites for a reason we are the majority we won the election we won brexit we won the wars we voted for foreigners too LEAVE that doesnt make us racist that makes us correct as we are the MAJORITY
posted on 12/6/20
Just Shoot (U10408)
In my view, there's a higher degree of racism and violence in football groups than society as a whole, which i why I think there's a connection.
You can disagree all you like, but I live in North London and I see it, very clearly amongst the Spurs fans.
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Benjamin Kallman (U1734)
posted 5 seconds ago
There called minorites for a reason we are the majority we won the election we won brexit we won the wars we voted for foreigners too LEAVE that doesnt make us racist that makes us correct as we are the MAJORITY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote for Barry
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 4 minutes ago
The whole concept of statues is ridiculous anyway. Take them all down. People talk about erasing history but the Hitler one was taken down and I’m fairly certain people know who he was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Including Fergies at OT?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be clear, I’m not actually campaigning for an end to statues but if there was a world where statues were deemed to be taken down then fair enough, bring them all down 😂
posted on 12/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don’t get about this ‘democratic process’ when removing statues is - if minorities are (rightly) offended by slavers being paraded above them as a statue, surely in more cases than not the majority will vote to keep the statues up.
But will the majority be right? Should black people have to see offensive statues just because the majority of a country were too ignorant to vote to get them down?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In a democracy the majority is right.
If more of the population want the statues to stay than don't then they should stay.
The Bristol vandals broke the law and should be punished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, be careful about how closely you tie yourself to the law.
Laws change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha, don't obey the law as it might change!?
More excuses for mob rule.
Page 4 of 12
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10