comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 7 minutes ago
Salah is a much better player than Hazard.
Just look at how poor Hazard has been at Real this year. Perez probably can’t wait to get Mbappe in as an actual Ronaldo replacement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs.. a much better player
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 27 minutes ago
Crazy to think if Greenwood was in your side instead of Salah you'd probably have over 100 goals for the season so far
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we were constantly playing teams of the standard of Colchester, Tranmere, Lask and Astana, then yes, he probably would score hatfuls for us.
Unfortunately, our forwards general operate at a slightly higher level than that. 😉
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 52 seconds ago
Whether he's a better player is a matter of opinion.
Hazard is probably a better ball carrier than any player in the world apart from Messi, but that's just one element of his game.
Also think it's a bit of a stretch to call multi title winners Chelsea a 'much poorer side'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay on and off poorer sides, and I reckon liverpool would have won the league this year without salah. I dont think chelsea would have finished in top 4 without hazard the years we won it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure whats funny about that, theres no chance we would have won the leagues we did without him and even with a half decent replacement.
comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 20 minutes ago
Salah is a much better player than Hazard.
Just look at how poor Hazard has been at Real this year. Perez probably can’t wait to get Mbappe in as an actual Ronaldo replacement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why would you judge hazards time at real and not his time in the pl when comparing their pl impact?
I guess for me it depends what you want, most liverpool fans wouldnt swap firmino for a bent like player. Its whatever benefits the team the most.
Hazard carried chelsea to two league titles, maybe with only one other world class star in kante.
Salah has 6 more PL assists than Hazard, having played 142 PL games less than Hazard.🤔
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good response
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good response
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what you mean, i'd already commented on what you'd said you donut in regards to the sides that won the league
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 9 minutes ago
Salah has 6 more PL assists than Hazard, having played 142 PL games less than Hazard.🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably got more than zidane too. Salah plays a completely different role at liverpool to hazard at chelsea.
They'd probably work really well together.
lou dont get me wrong salah is fantastic. but you cant deny this liverpool team is better than any of hazards chelsea team. infact the drop off in quality from hazard to another team member,maybe bar kante, was drastic.
Salah has mane, vvd, TAA, robertson and others all at similar level.
Robbing you're probably right there.
Also horses for courses, im sure not many liverpool fans would change firmino for danny ings currently. both different types of striker.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 9 minutes ago
Salah has 6 more PL assists than Hazard, having played 142 PL games less than Hazard.🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably got more than zidane too. Salah plays a completely different role at liverpool to hazard at chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
I posted these numbers as a recognition of his outstanding contribution towards our clubs recent success.
As always, some will decide to bring others into the conversation, which wasn't really the point of the article.
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 4 minutes ago
I posted these numbers as a recognition of his outstanding contribution towards our clubs recent success.
As always, some will decide to bring others into the conversation, which wasn't really the point of the article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah hes been phenomenal. Not sure why people brought other players into it.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 4 minutes ago
I posted these numbers as a recognition of his outstanding contribution towards our clubs recent success.
As always, some will decide to bring others into the conversation, which wasn't really the point of the article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah hes been phenomenal. Not sure why people brought other players into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because some fans love to proclaim their players as the best ever, rather than just appreciate them for what they are!
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good response
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what you mean, i'd already commented on what you'd said you donut in regards to the sides that won the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so I'm meant to trawl through an article looking for a response, not that bothered tbf
Sign in if you want to comment
Mo Salah.
Page 3 of 3
posted on 9/7/20
comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 7 minutes ago
Salah is a much better player than Hazard.
Just look at how poor Hazard has been at Real this year. Perez probably can’t wait to get Mbappe in as an actual Ronaldo replacement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs.. a much better player
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 27 minutes ago
Crazy to think if Greenwood was in your side instead of Salah you'd probably have over 100 goals for the season so far
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we were constantly playing teams of the standard of Colchester, Tranmere, Lask and Astana, then yes, he probably would score hatfuls for us.
Unfortunately, our forwards general operate at a slightly higher level than that. 😉
posted on 9/7/20
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
posted on 9/7/20
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 52 seconds ago
Whether he's a better player is a matter of opinion.
Hazard is probably a better ball carrier than any player in the world apart from Messi, but that's just one element of his game.
Also think it's a bit of a stretch to call multi title winners Chelsea a 'much poorer side'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay on and off poorer sides, and I reckon liverpool would have won the league this year without salah. I dont think chelsea would have finished in top 4 without hazard the years we won it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure whats funny about that, theres no chance we would have won the leagues we did without him and even with a half decent replacement.
posted on 9/7/20
comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 20 minutes ago
Salah is a much better player than Hazard.
Just look at how poor Hazard has been at Real this year. Perez probably can’t wait to get Mbappe in as an actual Ronaldo replacement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why would you judge hazards time at real and not his time in the pl when comparing their pl impact?
posted on 9/7/20
I guess for me it depends what you want, most liverpool fans wouldnt swap firmino for a bent like player. Its whatever benefits the team the most.
Hazard carried chelsea to two league titles, maybe with only one other world class star in kante.
posted on 9/7/20
Salah has 6 more PL assists than Hazard, having played 142 PL games less than Hazard.🤔
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good response
posted on 9/7/20
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good response
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what you mean, i'd already commented on what you'd said you donut in regards to the sides that won the league
posted on 9/7/20
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 9 minutes ago
Salah has 6 more PL assists than Hazard, having played 142 PL games less than Hazard.🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably got more than zidane too. Salah plays a completely different role at liverpool to hazard at chelsea.
posted on 9/7/20
They'd probably work really well together.
posted on 9/7/20
lou dont get me wrong salah is fantastic. but you cant deny this liverpool team is better than any of hazards chelsea team. infact the drop off in quality from hazard to another team member,maybe bar kante, was drastic.
Salah has mane, vvd, TAA, robertson and others all at similar level.
posted on 9/7/20
Robbing you're probably right there.
Also horses for courses, im sure not many liverpool fans would change firmino for danny ings currently. both different types of striker.
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 9 minutes ago
Salah has 6 more PL assists than Hazard, having played 142 PL games less than Hazard.🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably got more than zidane too. Salah plays a completely different role at liverpool to hazard at chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
posted on 9/7/20
I posted these numbers as a recognition of his outstanding contribution towards our clubs recent success.
As always, some will decide to bring others into the conversation, which wasn't really the point of the article.
posted on 9/7/20
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 4 minutes ago
I posted these numbers as a recognition of his outstanding contribution towards our clubs recent success.
As always, some will decide to bring others into the conversation, which wasn't really the point of the article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah hes been phenomenal. Not sure why people brought other players into it.
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 4 minutes ago
I posted these numbers as a recognition of his outstanding contribution towards our clubs recent success.
As always, some will decide to bring others into the conversation, which wasn't really the point of the article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah hes been phenomenal. Not sure why people brought other players into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because some fans love to proclaim their players as the best ever, rather than just appreciate them for what they are!
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by *Prankster 20/20 (U22336)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
his output is certainly better, but hes not a better player. Hazards link up, hold up play and general carrying of the ball for a much poorer side were unrivalled.
Similar to what grealish is at villa but obviously at a higher level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
didn't hazards poor side win the league a few times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
keep reading the comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good response
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what you mean, i'd already commented on what you'd said you donut in regards to the sides that won the league
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so I'm meant to trawl through an article looking for a response, not that bothered tbf
Page 3 of 3