Not being rude but have any of these so called valuations from either club come from any kind of a reputable source?
It’s easy to write a story.
Ed will grind them down to 120m
I highly doubt anyone at your club thinks they are getting anywhere near sancho with an offer of £50m.
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 minutes ago
Ed will grind them down to 120m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed will walk away.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 minutes ago
Ed will grind them down to 120m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed will walk away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was joking
I expect he will
116m + i imagine 80-100m contract. Its a lot of money.
Dortmund would be foolish to sell for less than 100m. If and when this pandemic is over the fees will likely return to normal. They really can't lose in this situation
Even if he kicks up a stink his price will remain high and still comfortably over the reported 50m utd will offer
You've got the best front three in the world so you don't really need him 😉
Another question is: would fans be happy to pay £100m+ on Sancho and buy nobody else?
116m is beyond ludicrous.
I personally do not see the point of Sancho. We should spend money on the defence and midfield.
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
i'd like to think that the "dortmund insist on £116m" story is posturing on their part, just as much as the "united value him at £50m" story is on ours.
he's clearly very talented, but a) he's never actually done a thing in the PL, so no guarantee he will tear it up, b) he's generally looked worse for england than rashford, and i doubt many people on here value him at £150m, and c) what is dortmund's alternative? hold onto a seemingly unhappy player for 12 (BCD) months, not win the BL, make no impression on the CL, and sell him next year for £50m?
they are suffering financially just as much as PL clubs, the new BL TV deal was lower than the previous one, and i doubt there will be many (or any) £100m+ deals this summer. my guess is he will leave for £70-80m guaranteed, with another £20mish in add-ons.
Cough up, City get a huge cut of any transfer fee.
i'd like to think that the "dortmund insist on £116m" story is posturing on their part, just as much as the "united value him at £50m" story is on ours.
______________
This. I'm pretty sure both sides can act responsibly in the current climate and reach a compromise with a figure of £115m.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 seconds ago
Cough up, City get a huge cut of any transfer fee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how big is "huge" by the way? asking for my girlfriend.
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 39 minutes ago
Not being rude but have any of these so called valuations from either club come from any kind of a reputable source?
It’s easy to write a story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we really need to caveat every story about rumours with "please note that rumours are not always based on factual evidence". Are we not all aware of how it works, while still being able to discuss it a bit?
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 23 minutes ago
Another question is: would fans be happy to pay £100m+ on Sancho and buy nobody else?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely not.
It’s be grossly irresponsible considering both the state of the squad and the current economic climate.
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
comment by rosso is done with this (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t be on a rush to leave Dortmund anyway. 80k seater stadium, good league, exciting young team..
comment by * R U Dumb, Stupid or Dumb (U18359)
posted 32 minutes ago
Dortmund would be foolish to sell for less than 100m. If and when this pandemic is over the fees will likely return to normal. They really can't lose in this situation
Even if he kicks up a stink his price will remain high and still comfortably over the reported 50m utd will offer
You've got the best front three in the world so you don't really need him 😉
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The economic impact of the pandemic is going to be prolonged and devastating.
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is done with this (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t be on a rush to leave Dortmund anyway. 80k seater stadium, good league, exciting young team..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stadium capacity is kind of moot for the foreseeable future.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is done with this (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t be on a rush to leave Dortmund anyway. 80k seater stadium, good league, exciting young team..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stadium capacity is kind of moot for the foreseeable future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true.
I think the type of player to bring in for RW should now be adjusted with the emergence of Greenwood. It looks like Greenwood is ready to be a regular and can't sign a 100m player to sit on the bench. However we still need a capable player to cover RW and I think a player like Traore would be a sensible approach. We can then reinforce our midfield and central defence with the money left plus from players sale.
I don’t care how much he’ll cost this summer, Bring him in,
Sancho can play across the front line. Even if we got no injuries, rotation alone would still see him and all our other attackers play the majority of matches. As it stands, you play Greenwood every week and hope he doesn't get burned out (which he will) or you play Dan James, Mata or Lingard. None of those are adequate back up options
Sign in if you want to comment
£116m for Sancho?
Page 1 of 4
posted on 12/7/20
Not being rude but have any of these so called valuations from either club come from any kind of a reputable source?
It’s easy to write a story.
posted on 12/7/20
Ed will grind them down to 120m
posted on 12/7/20
I highly doubt anyone at your club thinks they are getting anywhere near sancho with an offer of £50m.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 minutes ago
Ed will grind them down to 120m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed will walk away.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 minutes ago
Ed will grind them down to 120m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed will walk away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was joking
I expect he will
posted on 12/7/20
116m + i imagine 80-100m contract. Its a lot of money.
posted on 12/7/20
Dortmund would be foolish to sell for less than 100m. If and when this pandemic is over the fees will likely return to normal. They really can't lose in this situation
Even if he kicks up a stink his price will remain high and still comfortably over the reported 50m utd will offer
You've got the best front three in the world so you don't really need him 😉
posted on 12/7/20
Another question is: would fans be happy to pay £100m+ on Sancho and buy nobody else?
posted on 12/7/20
116m is beyond ludicrous.
posted on 12/7/20
I personally do not see the point of Sancho. We should spend money on the defence and midfield.
posted on 12/7/20
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
posted on 12/7/20
i'd like to think that the "dortmund insist on £116m" story is posturing on their part, just as much as the "united value him at £50m" story is on ours.
he's clearly very talented, but a) he's never actually done a thing in the PL, so no guarantee he will tear it up, b) he's generally looked worse for england than rashford, and i doubt many people on here value him at £150m, and c) what is dortmund's alternative? hold onto a seemingly unhappy player for 12 (BCD) months, not win the BL, make no impression on the CL, and sell him next year for £50m?
they are suffering financially just as much as PL clubs, the new BL TV deal was lower than the previous one, and i doubt there will be many (or any) £100m+ deals this summer. my guess is he will leave for £70-80m guaranteed, with another £20mish in add-ons.
posted on 12/7/20
Cough up, City get a huge cut of any transfer fee.
posted on 12/7/20
i'd like to think that the "dortmund insist on £116m" story is posturing on their part, just as much as the "united value him at £50m" story is on ours.
______________
This. I'm pretty sure both sides can act responsibly in the current climate and reach a compromise with a figure of £115m.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 seconds ago
Cough up, City get a huge cut of any transfer fee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how big is "huge" by the way? asking for my girlfriend.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 39 minutes ago
Not being rude but have any of these so called valuations from either club come from any kind of a reputable source?
It’s easy to write a story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we really need to caveat every story about rumours with "please note that rumours are not always based on factual evidence". Are we not all aware of how it works, while still being able to discuss it a bit?
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 23 minutes ago
Another question is: would fans be happy to pay £100m+ on Sancho and buy nobody else?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely not.
It’s be grossly irresponsible considering both the state of the squad and the current economic climate.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by rosso is done with this (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t be on a rush to leave Dortmund anyway. 80k seater stadium, good league, exciting young team..
posted on 12/7/20
comment by * R U Dumb, Stupid or Dumb (U18359)
posted 32 minutes ago
Dortmund would be foolish to sell for less than 100m. If and when this pandemic is over the fees will likely return to normal. They really can't lose in this situation
Even if he kicks up a stink his price will remain high and still comfortably over the reported 50m utd will offer
You've got the best front three in the world so you don't really need him 😉
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The economic impact of the pandemic is going to be prolonged and devastating.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is done with this (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t be on a rush to leave Dortmund anyway. 80k seater stadium, good league, exciting young team..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stadium capacity is kind of moot for the foreseeable future.
posted on 12/7/20
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by rosso is done with this (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 16 minutes ago
£50m was made up by the rags
But it does seem like Dortmund want to more than £100m for Sancho which in this climate is laughable.
They can do what they want but if Sancho doesn't move this summer his value drops massively next year as he will be in the final year of his contract.
Better for the clubs to agree a fee around £80m and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he doesn’t move this summer, he’ll sign a new contract with a bumper pay rise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t be on a rush to leave Dortmund anyway. 80k seater stadium, good league, exciting young team..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stadium capacity is kind of moot for the foreseeable future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true.
posted on 12/7/20
I think the type of player to bring in for RW should now be adjusted with the emergence of Greenwood. It looks like Greenwood is ready to be a regular and can't sign a 100m player to sit on the bench. However we still need a capable player to cover RW and I think a player like Traore would be a sensible approach. We can then reinforce our midfield and central defence with the money left plus from players sale.
posted on 12/7/20
I don’t care how much he’ll cost this summer, Bring him in,
posted on 12/7/20
Sancho can play across the front line. Even if we got no injuries, rotation alone would still see him and all our other attackers play the majority of matches. As it stands, you play Greenwood every week and hope he doesn't get burned out (which he will) or you play Dan James, Mata or Lingard. None of those are adequate back up options
Page 1 of 4