Good job there’s no libel laws on ja606

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 35 seconds ago
Good job there’s no libel laws on ja606
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There are.

But yet the fine stands???

comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 5 minutes ago
But yet the fine stands???
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have you read why though?

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 5 minutes ago
But yet the fine stands???
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have you read why though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.

But never heard of a judge telling the accused “you’ve been cleared of the charge against you but I’m going to fine you anyway”

We should appeal the fine

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 5 minutes ago
But yet the fine stands???
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have you read why though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So City are fined 10 million, for not cooperating with an investigation that was found to be flawed from the outset, and in most respects, had failed to comply with its own regulations in regard to timescales for admissible evidence ?🤔
Yep, makes total sense. 😂

“But never heard of a judge telling the accused “you’ve been cleared of the charge against you but I’m going to fine you anyway”

You might of if you bothered to read it

“Yep, makes total sense. 😂”

I wouldn’t expect it to make sense to someone so bitter about City they were crying the bookies have them as favourites to win the league next year.

I apologies, for thinking the guilty would be punished accordingly!

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I apologise City didn’t get punished for being cheats because it was more than 5 years ago.

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 22 seconds ago
“Yep, makes total sense. 😂”

I wouldn’t expect it to make sense to someone so bitter about City they were crying the bookies have them as favourites to win the league next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See you can't address the point though.
So if City have been exonerated, and CAS have found that UEFAs case was ill conceived, due to their own regulations in regard to a 5 year timescale foe admissible evidence, why on earth are City being fined?
Surely they should be receiving an apology, and compensation. 🤔

You must have known the verdict last week with Liverpool’s history of computer hacking

Don’t tell me you’re surprised

“It's okay though. I am sure your five member fanbase can go back supporting Stockport.”

Where have you picked that up from? Can’t believe anyone in the states knows what Stockport is 😂

Also not really a burn, I’ve already decided to watch more lower league once fans are allowed back in. Nice try though.

I’m glad they got cleared.

Hopefully FFP will now be gradually eroded and rendered ineffective.

Unless you’re going to have a centralised league with a salary-cap (a la the NFL or the NBA), then don’t bother with this type of nonsense.

Especially because it only makes it impossible for a ball club that isn’t already high-revenue to establish themselves at the top table.

I don’t see why clubs like Real should be able to spend loads on players but teams like Newcastle shouldn’t.

comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 22 seconds ago
“Yep, makes total sense. 😂”

I wouldn’t expect it to make sense to someone so bitter about City they were crying the bookies have them as favourites to win the league next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See you can't address the point though.
So if City have been exonerated, and CAS have found that UEFAs case was ill conceived, due to their own regulations in regard to a 5 year timescale foe admissible evidence, why on earth are City being fined?
Surely they should be receiving an apology, and compensation. 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you want me to address the point with? They haven’t released the evidence yet so I’ll wait for that

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 7 seconds ago
“It's okay though. I am sure your five member fanbase can go back supporting Stockport.”

Where have you picked that up from? Can’t believe anyone in the states knows what Stockport is 😂

Also not really a burn, I’ve already decided to watch more lower league once fans are allowed back in. Nice try though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re a yank City supporter? Bet you’re lonely

MCFC US supporter clubs only member.

The Oil barons are probably sponsoring 17 clubs in the US.. and balancing the books that way.

comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 7 minutes ago
F*ck your cheating club, owners, and demand for an apology.

Can't wait until they get bored treating your club like a toy then you'll get relegated and possibly liquidated.

It's okay though. I am sure your five member fanbase can go back supporting Stockport.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This would be funny if you weren't a plastic yank gun swinging nonce who has never stepped foot in Anfield isn't it?

Hilarious as well talking about Stockport when you've never set foot in the UK in your life.

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 22 seconds ago
“Yep, makes total sense. 😂”

I wouldn’t expect it to make sense to someone so bitter about City they were crying the bookies have them as favourites to win the league next year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See you can't address the point though.
So if City have been exonerated, and CAS have found that UEFAs case was ill conceived, due to their own regulations in regard to a 5 year timescale foe admissible evidence, why on earth are City being fined?
Surely they should be receiving an apology, and compensation. 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you want me to address the point with? They haven’t released the evidence yet so I’ll wait for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This information in regard to what I am talking about has already been released by both CAS, and UEFA.
And the question remains, why are City being fined for not cooperating with an ill conceived, and flawed investigation.
It litteraly makes no sense.

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 7 minutes ago
“But never heard of a judge telling the accused “you’ve been cleared of the charge against you but I’m going to fine you anyway”

You might of if you bothered to read it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty of breaking the rules but it was over 5 yrs ago so we’ll let it go 👍

I didn’t think it could be humanly possible to be more bitter than United fans

For once I was wrong

Comment deleted by Site Moderator