comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by rosso - for your protection, we’ve installed this camera (U17054)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have just explained that in my last post. Having the lump sum in his bank would earn him more interest than being paid weekly or monthly. So he isn't any worse off. He might even have some investment plans for it that can earn him more than it just being sat in a bank.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I very much doubt he would accept less than half what we owned when he could hold out for all of it and continue to go on loan for the duration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you’ve taught us through persistent repetition this last week, it isn’t a matter of your doubt, though, is it?
Where’s the evidence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm giving an opinion in the absence of any credible evidence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“If, could, might, possible.
Pure guesswork.“
Marouane FellainI'd-drive-him-to-Shandong-Luneng-myself-if-necessary
See ya later Pereiragator, in a while Rojodile
Row row Rojo boat out of Manchester
Marcos o long Rojo
Andreas Hugo now Pereira
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted 7 seconds ago
Row row Rojo boat out of Manchester
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh Jesus. What have I started?
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest, what planet do you live on? Banks dont pay interest any more. Soon you need to pay to stall your money in a bank.
Good Baillyyyyyyyy
Good Baillyyyyyyyy
However, it is certain there has still been a financial cost incurred, and that there is an arrangement where everyone involved has contributed to the £40m that Sanchez had been due in wages over the remaining two years of his contract. United will have given Sanchez his pay-off and the player has taken a pay cut.
It's fusilli money. Gone pasta joke.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
Sanchez is already a wealthy man.Perhaps he's not motivated by money as much now and just want to play in a place he feels settled. Italy could well suit his twilight years.
He probably will have had a loyalty bonus from United for not officially requesting a move but, then again, I'm not a contractual expert so I'm sure the powers that be will have sorted something.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
Elvis. I really don't think it's worth bothering with. Out of all the posters on here I'm sorry to say it's only RDD II that annoys me. He was telling us all the other day we shouldn't speculate about us signing a player and yet here he is now speculating about a contract of employment very little people will know anything about.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
We have paid to terminate his contract essentially. Good riddance.
He was telling us all the other day we shouldn't speculate about us signing a player
.....
Glad I wasn’t part of that.
Although some of our posters believe too much crap by people who really are not in the know.
If it doesn’t come from Jim Cocklord then it is probably bollox.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 10 minutes ago
He was telling us all the other day we shouldn't speculate about us signing a player
.....
Glad I wasn’t part of that.
Although some of our posters believe too much crap by people who really are not in the know.
If it doesn’t come from Jim Cocklord then it is probably bollox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very true. Too much trust in unregulated places like Twitter. Like you stare the only one consistent in there is cocklord.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know why. I've explained it. If you don't know you're extremely stupid.
You know why. I've explained it.
.......
And this is why I did something I rarely do. Filter someone.
You have explained this to him very clearly at least three times that I have seen.
Did we thrash Chelsea when Conte was there? If so, what other dross was in the side that day that we can send their way?
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know why. I've explained it. If you don't know you're extremely stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont. You have randomly stated could take a lump sum of less than half what we owe but suggested he cant have a lump sum for more than half.
You are funny
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
You know why. I've explained it.
.......
And this is why I did something I rarely do. Filter someone.
You have explained this to him very clearly at least three times that I have seen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tell me why he could have a lump sum of half what we owe him bit cant have a lump sum of half or more of what we owe him.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know why. I've explained it. If you don't know you're extremely stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell VC I'm proud to he the only person to VC him into submission.
Sign in if you want to comment
Sanchez has left the building
Page 5 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by rosso - for your protection, we’ve installed this camera (U17054)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have just explained that in my last post. Having the lump sum in his bank would earn him more interest than being paid weekly or monthly. So he isn't any worse off. He might even have some investment plans for it that can earn him more than it just being sat in a bank.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I very much doubt he would accept less than half what we owned when he could hold out for all of it and continue to go on loan for the duration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you’ve taught us through persistent repetition this last week, it isn’t a matter of your doubt, though, is it?
Where’s the evidence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm giving an opinion in the absence of any credible evidence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“If, could, might, possible.
Pure guesswork.“
posted on 6/8/20
Marouane FellainI'd-drive-him-to-Shandong-Luneng-myself-if-necessary
posted on 6/8/20
See ya later Pereiragator, in a while Rojodile
posted on 6/8/20
Row row Rojo boat out of Manchester
posted on 6/8/20
Marcos o long Rojo
Andreas Hugo now Pereira
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted 7 seconds ago
Row row Rojo boat out of Manchester
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh Jesus. What have I started?
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest, what planet do you live on? Banks dont pay interest any more. Soon you need to pay to stall your money in a bank.
posted on 6/8/20
Good Baillyyyyyyyy
Good Baillyyyyyyyy
posted on 6/8/20
However, it is certain there has still been a financial cost incurred, and that there is an arrangement where everyone involved has contributed to the £40m that Sanchez had been due in wages over the remaining two years of his contract. United will have given Sanchez his pay-off and the player has taken a pay cut.
posted on 6/8/20
It's fusilli money. Gone pasta joke.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
posted on 6/8/20
Mine was better.
posted on 6/8/20
Sanchez is already a wealthy man.Perhaps he's not motivated by money as much now and just want to play in a place he feels settled. Italy could well suit his twilight years.
He probably will have had a loyalty bonus from United for not officially requesting a move but, then again, I'm not a contractual expert so I'm sure the powers that be will have sorted something.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
posted on 6/8/20
Elvis. I really don't think it's worth bothering with. Out of all the posters on here I'm sorry to say it's only RDD II that annoys me. He was telling us all the other day we shouldn't speculate about us signing a player and yet here he is now speculating about a contract of employment very little people will know anything about.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
posted on 6/8/20
We have paid to terminate his contract essentially. Good riddance.
posted on 6/8/20
He was telling us all the other day we shouldn't speculate about us signing a player
.....
Glad I wasn’t part of that.
Although some of our posters believe too much crap by people who really are not in the know.
If it doesn’t come from Jim Cocklord then it is probably bollox.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 10 minutes ago
He was telling us all the other day we shouldn't speculate about us signing a player
.....
Glad I wasn’t part of that.
Although some of our posters believe too much crap by people who really are not in the know.
If it doesn’t come from Jim Cocklord then it is probably bollox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very true. Too much trust in unregulated places like Twitter. Like you stare the only one consistent in there is cocklord.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know why. I've explained it. If you don't know you're extremely stupid.
posted on 6/8/20
You know why. I've explained it.
.......
And this is why I did something I rarely do. Filter someone.
You have explained this to him very clearly at least three times that I have seen.
posted on 6/8/20
Did we thrash Chelsea when Conte was there? If so, what other dross was in the side that day that we can send their way?
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know why. I've explained it. If you don't know you're extremely stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont. You have randomly stated could take a lump sum of less than half what we owe but suggested he cant have a lump sum for more than half.
You are funny
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
You know why. I've explained it.
.......
And this is why I did something I rarely do. Filter someone.
You have explained this to him very clearly at least three times that I have seen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tell me why he could have a lump sum of half what we owe him bit cant have a lump sum of half or more of what we owe him.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
X amount still owed in wages
We will have given Sanchez half, with Inter paying him the other half and more over the 3 years of his contract with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt we will have paid as much as half. As Sanchez has the benefit of having that lump sum (whatever it is) sat in his bank earning interest, rather than being paid weekly or monthly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he leave for less than what he was owed unless their was some financial.incentive? He had us over a barrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start, he might have been willing to slightly cut his total earnings in order to play regular football at a team where he has been successful, instead of languishing on the bench at a team where he has been a flop. Some footballers are motivated by having the opportunity to play high level football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he could continue to do that whilst earning 100% of his wages on loan at Inter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without the security of the third year on the contract he now has. Or the security that he/his family will be settled at the same club for the next few years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think hed take less money from us, in order to secure a 3rd year of earning less than he could us e had from us. Gotcha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I think he'd take less money from us knowing that he could invest that lump sum and earn more from the investment of it by having it sooner than he would otherwise have had it if he were getting paid weekly/monthly (over a 2 year period) Its really very simple.
The third year of the contract isn't really that relevant in relation to his contract with United. However, it does mean that Sanchez can secure another contracted year of playing football and earning money. Which might not be the case if he were to stay at United and suffer a serious injury.
Anything else you need explaining down to the tiniest little detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does he I let get a lump sum in your scenario, if it's less than half that owed đđđ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know why. I've explained it. If you don't know you're extremely stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell VC I'm proud to he the only person to VC him into submission.
Page 5 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9