Spending £100m to bench a brilliant young talent whilst having Ighalo as our no 2 CF is not a good idea.
____________
Sancho, Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, Igahlo, James
versus
Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, Ighalo, James, new CF
I just think the first set gives us better options across the front three as a whole. I've said a new CF would be nice, but I think we've got three players capable of playing there while only Greenwood has looked good on the right consistently (James has been far better on the left). The first set gives us 2-3 options in each position; the second still leaves us with only Greenwood on the right before we're struggling.
So I'd have a new CF... after I'd strengthened DM, CB and RW/RF.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 10 minutes ago
I'm saying wed be irresponsible going into the season relying on him to score the goals for a title challenge if we were without Martial for a prolonged period.
----------
So who do you want to sign that will fill in if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd like Ole to sign a top quality CF and pick who he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you have some suggestions that will come in and fill the role if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless me giving suggestions.
Doesnt change the fact we need better options at CF for Ole to choose from
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not pointless at all
Its something that's exercised your mind for the past week you've must have come up with some names.
Given we dont have unlimited funds, have other positions that need addressing and not too mention we still have the muppet Ed handling our business ,
What names have sprung to your mind ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is pointless as we have zero.influence.
Why don't you try and come up wiith some quality CF's we could get to compete with Martial for the starting spot?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Given I subscribe to the theory that one of our prioritys is the signing of a right sided attacker I'm prepared to go into the season with the cf coverage we have at present
You are the one with the problem so give us your names if you aren't happy with igalho et al
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 10 minutes ago
I'm saying wed be irresponsible going into the season relying on him to score the goals for a title challenge if we were without Martial for a prolonged period.
----------
So who do you want to sign that will fill in if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd like Ole to sign a top quality CF and pick who he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you have some suggestions that will come in and fill the role if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless me giving suggestions.
Doesnt change the fact we need better options at CF for Ole to choose from
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not pointless at all
Its something that's exercised your mind for the past week you've must have come up with some names.
Given we dont have unlimited funds, have other positions that need addressing and not too mention we still have the muppet Ed handling our business ,
What names have sprung to your mind ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is pointless as we have zero.influence.
Why don't you try and come up wiith some quality CF's we could get to compete with Martial for the starting spot?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Given I subscribe to the theory that one of our prioritys is the signing of a right sided attacker I'm prepared to go into the season with the cf coverage we have at present
You are the one with the problem so give us your names if you aren't happy with igalho et al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CF could be right sided
In fairness to RDD, two good strikers is not one too many. Cole, Teddy, York and Ole were more than one if I remember
.. But they had Becks feeding them, but we don't.
So RW first, and good striker second.
A good striker never goes amiss.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 36 minutes ago
In fairness to RDD, two good strikers is not one too many. Cole, Teddy, York and Ole were more than one if I remember
.. But they had Becks feeding them, but we don't.
So RW first, and good striker second.
A good striker never goes amiss.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No denying that 52 but it took fergie more than one season to assemble that squad of players.
Like you say we can never have too many quality players but at this time quality for our RW is the priority.
Sign in if you want to comment
The Morning After
Page 4 of 4
posted on 17/8/20
Spending £100m to bench a brilliant young talent whilst having Ighalo as our no 2 CF is not a good idea.
____________
Sancho, Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, Igahlo, James
versus
Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, Ighalo, James, new CF
I just think the first set gives us better options across the front three as a whole. I've said a new CF would be nice, but I think we've got three players capable of playing there while only Greenwood has looked good on the right consistently (James has been far better on the left). The first set gives us 2-3 options in each position; the second still leaves us with only Greenwood on the right before we're struggling.
So I'd have a new CF... after I'd strengthened DM, CB and RW/RF.
posted on 17/8/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 10 minutes ago
I'm saying wed be irresponsible going into the season relying on him to score the goals for a title challenge if we were without Martial for a prolonged period.
----------
So who do you want to sign that will fill in if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd like Ole to sign a top quality CF and pick who he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you have some suggestions that will come in and fill the role if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless me giving suggestions.
Doesnt change the fact we need better options at CF for Ole to choose from
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not pointless at all
Its something that's exercised your mind for the past week you've must have come up with some names.
Given we dont have unlimited funds, have other positions that need addressing and not too mention we still have the muppet Ed handling our business ,
What names have sprung to your mind ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is pointless as we have zero.influence.
Why don't you try and come up wiith some quality CF's we could get to compete with Martial for the starting spot?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Given I subscribe to the theory that one of our prioritys is the signing of a right sided attacker I'm prepared to go into the season with the cf coverage we have at present
You are the one with the problem so give us your names if you aren't happy with igalho et al
posted on 17/8/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/8/20
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 10 minutes ago
I'm saying wed be irresponsible going into the season relying on him to score the goals for a title challenge if we were without Martial for a prolonged period.
----------
So who do you want to sign that will fill in if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd like Ole to sign a top quality CF and pick who he wants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you have some suggestions that will come in and fill the role if martial is out for a prolonged period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless me giving suggestions.
Doesnt change the fact we need better options at CF for Ole to choose from
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not pointless at all
Its something that's exercised your mind for the past week you've must have come up with some names.
Given we dont have unlimited funds, have other positions that need addressing and not too mention we still have the muppet Ed handling our business ,
What names have sprung to your mind ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is pointless as we have zero.influence.
Why don't you try and come up wiith some quality CF's we could get to compete with Martial for the starting spot?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Given I subscribe to the theory that one of our prioritys is the signing of a right sided attacker I'm prepared to go into the season with the cf coverage we have at present
You are the one with the problem so give us your names if you aren't happy with igalho et al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CF could be right sided
posted on 17/8/20
In fairness to RDD, two good strikers is not one too many. Cole, Teddy, York and Ole were more than one if I remember
.. But they had Becks feeding them, but we don't.
So RW first, and good striker second.
A good striker never goes amiss.
posted on 17/8/20
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 36 minutes ago
In fairness to RDD, two good strikers is not one too many. Cole, Teddy, York and Ole were more than one if I remember
.. But they had Becks feeding them, but we don't.
So RW first, and good striker second.
A good striker never goes amiss.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No denying that 52 but it took fergie more than one season to assemble that squad of players.
Like you say we can never have too many quality players but at this time quality for our RW is the priority.
Page 4 of 4