The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 39 seconds ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup, the refs have it within their giff to make a decision, and say play on. But none of them have the balllllls to do that, they just hide behind VAR.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 20 seconds ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was no ricochet and I'm guessing they're referring to a player hindering the player who has handballed it?
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
Surprised Mourinho didn't pull the team from the pitch. Until drastic measures happen the FA will do FA.
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 57 seconds ago
Seriously though if it hits his arm and it's not in the air, it's not a penalty due to it being so close to the ball and no time to get it away. With it being in the air, there can only be one decisions. It's in the law for god sake. Really don't understand the controversy. Very unlucky, yes but the correct decision according to the law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the law says you have to foul somebody to give away the freekick. So their was no foul, so should not have been a freekick. You either follow the law or or you don`t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't see it. I only saw the handball. The wife had me out buying furniture.
Carroll looked offside to me, how do we know if the clown operating the mouse to put those slip shod lines on the screen is doing it 100% accurately? We don`t, they could be applying a margin of error any way they see fit, and nobody can question it.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
We need to buy Andy Carroll
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can understand some people feel that way. I disagree as if your hand is in the air and puts the other team at a disadvantage because of that, the other team should be rewarded, in my opinion. Afterall it's football not handball.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can understand some people feel that way. I disagree as if your hand is in the air and puts the other team at a disadvantage because of that, the other team should be rewarded, in my opinion. Afterall it's football not handball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’ve ever played football at any level you will know that you simply cannot jump without raiding your hands somewhat for balance. A player who jumps and keeps his hands by his side risks landing awkwardly and injury.
Added to today’s situation, Dier was looking the other way and was at point blank range.
Daft decision today and a daft rule overall.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can understand some people feel that way. I disagree as if your hand is in the air and puts the other team at a disadvantage because of that, the other team should be rewarded, in my opinion. Afterall it's football not handball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’ve ever played football at any level you will know that you simply cannot jump without raiding your hands somewhat for balance. A player who jumps and keeps his hands by his side risks landing awkwardly and injury.
Added to today’s situation, Dier was looking the other way and was at point blank range.
Daft decision today and a daft rule overall.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ive played football at a level, a crap level granted but I never had to put my arm up in the air behind me to jump to head the ball. I especially wouldn't have done it knowing the rules say if you do, the other team will get a penalty. It matters not one bit where he was looking, it matters where his arm was and it was in the air above his head for some reason.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not606
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he isn't.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he isn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither are you
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So presumably you can share a link to it.
Try wasting your time searching here
https://www.theifab.com/home
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 7 minutes ago
Teams will definitely learn to exploit this rule. Thankfully we have a manager is probably already working on getting his players to win penalties for handballs in the box. Still an unfair rule though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow just need to aim at a players arm, instead of shooting. Guaranteed penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So yesterday you were advocating using the new penalty rule as a way to gain penalties but as soon as the same rule is used to award a penalty against Spurs you're 'done with the modern game of football'.
FFS Sandy you cannot blame the rule you wanted to use to your advantage for today's result. Your team couldn't hit a barn door from 3 feet away let alone an opposition player's arm.
You should have scored more goals from open play, that's the way you win games, not hoping for a dodgy penalty.
Sign in if you want to comment
I have to say I am pretty well done
Page 2 of 3
posted on 27/9/20
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 39 seconds ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup, the refs have it within their giff to make a decision, and say play on. But none of them have the balllllls to do that, they just hide behind VAR.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 20 seconds ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was no ricochet and I'm guessing they're referring to a player hindering the player who has handballed it?
posted on 27/9/20
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
posted on 27/9/20
Surprised Mourinho didn't pull the team from the pitch. Until drastic measures happen the FA will do FA.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 57 seconds ago
Seriously though if it hits his arm and it's not in the air, it's not a penalty due to it being so close to the ball and no time to get it away. With it being in the air, there can only be one decisions. It's in the law for god sake. Really don't understand the controversy. Very unlucky, yes but the correct decision according to the law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the law says you have to foul somebody to give away the freekick. So their was no foul, so should not have been a freekick. You either follow the law or or you don`t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't see it. I only saw the handball. The wife had me out buying furniture.
posted on 27/9/20
Carroll looked offside to me, how do we know if the clown operating the mouse to put those slip shod lines on the screen is doing it 100% accurately? We don`t, they could be applying a margin of error any way they see fit, and nobody can question it.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
posted on 27/9/20
We need to buy Andy Carroll
posted on 27/9/20
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can understand some people feel that way. I disagree as if your hand is in the air and puts the other team at a disadvantage because of that, the other team should be rewarded, in my opinion. Afterall it's football not handball.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can understand some people feel that way. I disagree as if your hand is in the air and puts the other team at a disadvantage because of that, the other team should be rewarded, in my opinion. Afterall it's football not handball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’ve ever played football at any level you will know that you simply cannot jump without raiding your hands somewhat for balance. A player who jumps and keeps his hands by his side risks landing awkwardly and injury.
Added to today’s situation, Dier was looking the other way and was at point blank range.
Daft decision today and a daft rule overall.
posted on 27/9/20
*raising not raiding
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don’t seriously think that was a penalty do you TOOR?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a penalty. It's in the law. His arm is in the air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The law is daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can understand some people feel that way. I disagree as if your hand is in the air and puts the other team at a disadvantage because of that, the other team should be rewarded, in my opinion. Afterall it's football not handball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’ve ever played football at any level you will know that you simply cannot jump without raiding your hands somewhat for balance. A player who jumps and keeps his hands by his side risks landing awkwardly and injury.
Added to today’s situation, Dier was looking the other way and was at point blank range.
Daft decision today and a daft rule overall.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ive played football at a level, a crap level granted but I never had to put my arm up in the air behind me to jump to head the ball. I especially wouldn't have done it knowing the rules say if you do, the other team will get a penalty. It matters not one bit where he was looking, it matters where his arm was and it was in the air above his head for some reason.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not606
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he isn't.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he isn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither are you
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* (U3924)
posted 23 minutes ago
The actual rule states that extra leeway should be given on ricochet handballs or if the player in question can not see the ball.
So, today`s mug couldn`t even apply these (ridiculous) rules correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes you look really stupid saying that the ref couldn't apply the rules correctly whilst at the same time making up things about the rules.
There is literally no mention in the handball law on players not being able to see the ball. You have just made that up out of thin air.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I have just read the IFAB`s instruction on the amendment to the handball rule. I can`t link so google it if you don`t believe it.
So yes, you are the stupid one (but being a Pool fan, we already knew that), and not me pal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the actual rules - https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
Please point out exactly where it mentions not being able to see the ball. I note that you explicitly said "the actual rules state" this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.not606.com/attachments/upload_2020-9-27_16-29-44-png.162869/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error page. Presumably you will be able to provide this from an official source.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest, Billy is right. I’ve seen it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So presumably you can share a link to it.
posted on 27/9/20
Try wasting your time searching here
https://www.theifab.com/home
posted on 27/9/20
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 7 minutes ago
Teams will definitely learn to exploit this rule. Thankfully we have a manager is probably already working on getting his players to win penalties for handballs in the box. Still an unfair rule though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow just need to aim at a players arm, instead of shooting. Guaranteed penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So yesterday you were advocating using the new penalty rule as a way to gain penalties but as soon as the same rule is used to award a penalty against Spurs you're 'done with the modern game of football'.
FFS Sandy you cannot blame the rule you wanted to use to your advantage for today's result. Your team couldn't hit a barn door from 3 feet away let alone an opposition player's arm.
You should have scored more goals from open play, that's the way you win games, not hoping for a dodgy penalty.
Page 2 of 3