comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Justice on the handball...no fkn way was that handball
----------------------------------------------------------------------
current rules yes it is. Stupid but not the "wrong" decision
We were a bit rubbish finding the final pass but other than that we were bossing most of the game.
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Justice on the handball...no fkn way was that handball
----------------------------------------------------------------------
current rules yes it is. Stupid but not the "wrong" decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree that wqs a pen based on rules.
I wo der id we missed out chance on that first half
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diving header? You'd have to be diving as the ball is played in!
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are horizontal when the ball is played then the crosser better have facking good aim and enough speed on the ball to rip your head off
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are horizontal when the ball is played then the crosser better have facking good aim and enough speed on the ball to rip your head off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but you don't have to already be horizontal. You can be in your feet and leaning forward and still be beyond the last defender who cannot then get back to the ball but you can.
Will ye put yer boot through the ball fer fack sake ..
Jota has mishit a few shots today. Hope he didn't leave his shooting boots in Italy.
No power in that shot ffs. Should have scored
Two very good teams but it’s a bit rivalry light, the two managers showing respect not like Wenger and Fergie it’s missing the hatred factor we have with Pool and had with Arsenal Need to get some Pizza throwing going on
How the fack is that a free kick to them
comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted less than a minute ago
Two very good teams but it’s a bit rivalry light, the two managers showing respect not like Wenger and Fergie it’s missing the hatred factor we have with Pool and had with Arsenal Need to get some Pizza throwing going on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ref has decided it's City's game today.
Sign in if you want to comment
FT: MAN CITY 1-1 LIVERPOOL
Page 11 of 18
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 8/11/20
First
posted on 8/11/20
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Justice on the handball...no fkn way was that handball
----------------------------------------------------------------------
current rules yes it is. Stupid but not the "wrong" decision
posted on 8/11/20
We were a bit rubbish finding the final pass but other than that we were bossing most of the game.
posted on 8/11/20
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Justice on the handball...no fkn way was that handball
----------------------------------------------------------------------
current rules yes it is. Stupid but not the "wrong" decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree that wqs a pen based on rules.
posted on 8/11/20
I wo der id we missed out chance on that first half
posted on 8/11/20
Take that Kevin!
posted on 8/11/20
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
posted on 8/11/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diving header? You'd have to be diving as the ball is played in!
posted on 8/11/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are horizontal when the ball is played then the crosser better have facking good aim and enough speed on the ball to rip your head off
posted on 8/11/20
Slow-no dive
posted on 8/11/20
Slow-mo *
posted on 8/11/20
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted about a minute ago
he tried to get his hands out of the way but didn't in time. Rules are unclear and I'm not gonna complain about it as it's 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent should be a huge part in decision making, Look at bamford...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean? If a player didn't intend to be offside then it shouldn't be given even if he is offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, offside is about having an unfair advantage, I wouldnt say pointing qualifies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is about being closer to the goal than the second last defender when the ball is played. It is next to impossible to decide if a player gained an advantage from being offside because it is impossible to say what would have happened if they had been onside, so advantage doesn't come into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No thats how its determined, not the spirit of the rule.
And it should be determined soley from foot positioning, Not a rough estimate on a distance 1/5th of the way down the arm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spirit of the rule is reflected in the wording of the rule, otherwise they would have worded it differently.
If they wanted to they could change it to feet, but this would make it significantly harder for linesman to see (although tht might be less of a problem with VAR) and ignores the fact that you can score with other parts of the body
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that to beat a defender to a ball with say, your head, Your foot position is going to have a massive role to play, its not like you can run horizontally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't disagree on the whole but there are definitely situations like diving headers where having your head and upper body beyond the last defender could make a big difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are horizontal when the ball is played then the crosser better have facking good aim and enough speed on the ball to rip your head off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but you don't have to already be horizontal. You can be in your feet and leaning forward and still be beyond the last defender who cannot then get back to the ball but you can.
posted on 8/11/20
Another chance passes by
posted on 8/11/20
Will ye put yer boot through the ball fer fack sake ..
posted on 8/11/20
Jota has mishit a few shots today. Hope he didn't leave his shooting boots in Italy.
posted on 8/11/20
No power in that shot ffs. Should have scored
posted on 8/11/20
bit poor that
posted on 8/11/20
Alisson hurt?
posted on 8/11/20
Snatching at it ..
posted on 8/11/20
Two very good teams but it’s a bit rivalry light, the two managers showing respect not like Wenger and Fergie it’s missing the hatred factor we have with Pool and had with Arsenal Need to get some Pizza throwing going on
posted on 8/11/20
How the fack is that a free kick to them
posted on 8/11/20
weird decision alright
posted on 8/11/20
comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted less than a minute ago
Two very good teams but it’s a bit rivalry light, the two managers showing respect not like Wenger and Fergie it’s missing the hatred factor we have with Pool and had with Arsenal Need to get some Pizza throwing going on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 8/11/20
Ref has decided it's City's game today.
posted on 8/11/20
Good control Walker
Page 11 of 18
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16