comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 2 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
comment by * (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 48 seconds ago
Piiish performance, like many recent ones except this time we didn't manage to grind out the win. We've stretched our lead by 2 points over the last 2 games but still concerning that performance levels have dropped significantly and there's no sign of solutions except to keep grinding it out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely agree with this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Solutions are getting Arfield, jack and roofe back.
We have had to play Hibs , Celtic, Aberdeen and Motherwell and took 10 points out of 12 with a depleted team. That not bad going 👍
We need better defensive midfield and more options up front.
Roofe and itten give us more options up front.
Jack and Arfield better defensive options in midfield
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
I thought Davis was class again today. MOTM for me by a mile
Tav, Aribo, Kamara and Kent were all very poor
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
Here.
What will your fan base want if you do go on a roll for a couple of years and fans are back with the 800 allowed into our ground?
Interesting 🤨
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 8 minutes ago
I thought Davis was class again today. MOTM for me by a mile
Tav, Aribo, Kamara and Kent were all very poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on. All of those 4 were p@sh today.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without either of us, there is no product. Our away support props up nigh on every other club in this league.
Their erses collapse.
Rangers fans going to all those grounds during the 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs for a year or so.
comment by * (U22266)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without either of us, there is no product. Our away support props up nigh on every other club in this league.
Their erses collapse.
Rangers fans going to all those grounds during the 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs for a year or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep and fair play for that.
I’d have loved to have done it although not as a result of the punishment. I yearn for the days of going back round all of those old grounds.
Playing each other up to 4 and sometimes 6 times a year makes the Fir Parks and Killie’s become an absolute bore. And don’t start me on the likes of Hamilton.
My cap is doffed to Zach who went to most
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without either of us, there is no product. Our away support props up nigh on every other club in this league.
Their erses collapse.
Rangers fans going to all those grounds during the 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs for a year or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep and fair play for that.
I’d have loved to have done it although not as a result of the punishment. I yearn for the days of going back round all of those old grounds.
Playing each other up to 4 and sometimes 6 times a year makes the Fir Parks and Killie’s become an absolute bore. And don’t start me on the likes of Hamilton.
My cap is doffed to Zach who went to most
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TBF - Zach went to the inauguaration of Julius Caesar.
comment by lexballielegend (U22335)
posted 1 minute ago
Propped up those clubs, that is utter self entitled schite, those clubs did just fine before and after Rangers were luckily enough to be allowed into the 4th tier, utter indulgent tripe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really?
Have you been on the pipe of crack already?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by lexballielegend (U22335)
posted 49 seconds ago
One of my good mates is a Falkirk fan and he gives not one flying fook about Celtic or Rangers nor does he hanker to play us, Ivory tower schite speak to a fan that does not follow either of the Old Firm and you may get a surprise about how much they love their clubs and football and care not a jot who wins the Old Firm battle, its really not all about us you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah - loving the change of tune since your club are dung.
Quelle my surprise...
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Why do you keeping out with utter rubbish just because your club is utter Tam Kite?
You really don't think that the Rangers away support during ra 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs in the lower leagues?
Take the tinters aff FFS.
comment by lexballielegend (U22335)
posted 1 minute ago
Crack pipeaway an gies peace that the best you can retort with when a debate on football is questioned, sad sad man even sadder than your no mark threadsRangers think everyone needs them some idiot Celtic fans think that too, its not true.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So which team boosted the income of nigh on every lower league team in Scotland.
In your own time.
You really need to calm the beel mate.
'Ra Ten'
Gone - wee pipe dream.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I’m saying is that the league just becomes a bigger joke if one team is romping it year after year.
At least there’s some interest for the neutral if both OF clubs are going for it.
And as much as fans love their team winning, it becomes expected that they win and entitlement creeps in
Sign in if you want to comment
Motherwell v Rangers
Page 9 of 13
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 2 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
posted on 17/1/21
comment by * (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 48 seconds ago
Piiish performance, like many recent ones except this time we didn't manage to grind out the win. We've stretched our lead by 2 points over the last 2 games but still concerning that performance levels have dropped significantly and there's no sign of solutions except to keep grinding it out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely agree with this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Solutions are getting Arfield, jack and roofe back.
We have had to play Hibs , Celtic, Aberdeen and Motherwell and took 10 points out of 12 with a depleted team. That not bad going 👍
We need better defensive midfield and more options up front.
Roofe and itten give us more options up front.
Jack and Arfield better defensive options in midfield
posted on 17/1/21
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
posted on 17/1/21
I thought Davis was class again today. MOTM for me by a mile
Tav, Aribo, Kamara and Kent were all very poor
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
posted on 17/1/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/1/21
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
posted on 17/1/21
Here.
What will your fan base want if you do go on a roll for a couple of years and fans are back with the 800 allowed into our ground?
Interesting 🤨
posted on 17/1/21
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 8 minutes ago
I thought Davis was class again today. MOTM for me by a mile
Tav, Aribo, Kamara and Kent were all very poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on. All of those 4 were p@sh today.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without either of us, there is no product. Our away support props up nigh on every other club in this league.
Their erses collapse.
Rangers fans going to all those grounds during the 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs for a year or so.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by * (U22266)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without either of us, there is no product. Our away support props up nigh on every other club in this league.
Their erses collapse.
Rangers fans going to all those grounds during the 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs for a year or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep and fair play for that.
I’d have loved to have done it although not as a result of the punishment. I yearn for the days of going back round all of those old grounds.
Playing each other up to 4 and sometimes 6 times a year makes the Fir Parks and Killie’s become an absolute bore. And don’t start me on the likes of Hamilton.
My cap is doffed to Zach who went to most
posted on 17/1/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without either of us, there is no product. Our away support props up nigh on every other club in this league.
Their erses collapse.
Rangers fans going to all those grounds during the 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs for a year or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep and fair play for that.
I’d have loved to have done it although not as a result of the punishment. I yearn for the days of going back round all of those old grounds.
Playing each other up to 4 and sometimes 6 times a year makes the Fir Parks and Killie’s become an absolute bore. And don’t start me on the likes of Hamilton.
My cap is doffed to Zach who went to most
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TBF - Zach went to the inauguaration of Julius Caesar.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by lexballielegend (U22335)
posted 1 minute ago
Propped up those clubs, that is utter self entitled schite, those clubs did just fine before and after Rangers were luckily enough to be allowed into the 4th tier, utter indulgent tripe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really?
Have you been on the pipe of crack already?
posted on 17/1/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/1/21
comment by lexballielegend (U22335)
posted 49 seconds ago
One of my good mates is a Falkirk fan and he gives not one flying fook about Celtic or Rangers nor does he hanker to play us, Ivory tower schite speak to a fan that does not follow either of the Old Firm and you may get a surprise about how much they love their clubs and football and care not a jot who wins the Old Firm battle, its really not all about us you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah - loving the change of tune since your club are dung.
Quelle my surprise...
posted on 17/1/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/1/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/1/21
Why do you keeping out with utter rubbish just because your club is utter Tam Kite?
You really don't think that the Rangers away support during ra 'Banter Years' propped up those clubs in the lower leagues?
Take the tinters aff FFS.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by lexballielegend (U22335)
posted 1 minute ago
Crack pipeaway an gies peace that the best you can retort with when a debate on football is questioned, sad sad man even sadder than your no mark threadsRangers think everyone needs them some idiot Celtic fans think that too, its not true.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So which team boosted the income of nigh on every lower league team in Scotland.
In your own time.
posted on 17/1/21
You really need to calm the beel mate.
'Ra Ten'
Gone - wee pipe dream.
posted on 17/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by rats juice wun uz ra leeg...so it huz (U6393)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Joe-ny Stokes is my da (U15888)
posted 3 minutes ago
Smirk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A minor smirk for you in a season of big belly laughs for us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A season of laughs for you in a decade of chortlery (new word) for us.
Hah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll gladly take it while it’s going
Maybe I should rephrase that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Long overdue.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the banter years there were times I’ve thought “where the fwck are we going with this?”
Other than two periods of utter domination, the league has tended to swing backwards and forwards and made it all the more exciting for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
The question was asked if the league needed Rangers and the resounding answer was no. Then look what happened.
Both Rangers and Celtic need their nemesis. If one has a collapse it becomes boring and makes a bigger mockery of our already constantly mocked league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I’ll take this.
No it doesn’t need Rangers. Nor does it need Celtic.
It’s better with both of them however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I’m saying is that the league just becomes a bigger joke if one team is romping it year after year.
At least there’s some interest for the neutral if both OF clubs are going for it.
And as much as fans love their team winning, it becomes expected that they win and entitlement creeps in
Page 9 of 13
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13