comment by Zachsda( Declan, put the shark doon that’s the reserves) (U1850)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
See if the rumours are correct and Celtic have proof that the ScotGov changed their rules retrospectively to punish Celtic then that really would be incendiary.

What is the FIFA penalty for governments interfering in football? That right, kicked out, no Euros, no CL place etc. Nae luck nippy, nae Indy surge. Nae luck Rangers, nae £40m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS No another dossier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sniff Sniff,

Yup, I smell scheidt....

comment by Zachsda( Declan, put the shark doon that&rsquo... (U1850)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
See if the rumours are correct and Celtic have proof that the ScotGov changed their rules retrospectively to punish Celtic then that really would be incendiary.

What is the FIFA penalty for governments interfering in football? That right, kicked out, no Euros, no CL place etc. Nae luck nippy, nae Indy surge. Nae luck Rangers, nae £40m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS No another dossier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was posted through the door - a lobey dossier.

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 46 minutes ago
Magnum

I have a problem with anyone that stirs up conspiracy theories about agendas or bias existing within our game....against anyone

Lot a scheite
Always will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a lot of scheidt.
Some of it is and some of it isn't.
Jim Farry being removed from office is proof of that.
I've heard the after dinner chat from MrTait.
I've been in the company of the son of a well known referee when he announced that his father was going to give a penalty against Celtic in a match later that day and that Celtic would not be winning that match. Celtic had a dodgy penalty given against them and didn't win the match. Probably just a coincidence.

Lennon should have kept his trap shut. Better to go on the attack from a position of strength.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I had an interesting discussion with Kenny Clarke about refereeing while I was working with uefa last year.

He says your talking pash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Everything I said is factual and two of the three things are matters of record.
So Kenny is wrong again.

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
See if the rumours are correct and Celtic have proof that the ScotGov changed their rules retrospectively to punish Celtic then that really would be incendiary.

What is the FIFA penalty for governments interfering in football? That right, kicked out, no Euros, no CL place etc. Nae luck nippy, nae Indy surge. Nae luck Rangers, nae £40m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some lengths they are stretching to cover for the clusterfluck that is this season

Aye the government made you scheidt in Europe, an embarrassment that just keeps getting worse...

Dearie me

comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 46 minutes ago
Magnum

I have a problem with anyone that stirs up conspiracy theories about agendas or bias existing within our game....against anyone

Lot a scheite
Always will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a lot of scheidt.
Some of it is and some of it isn't.
Jim Farry being removed from office is proof of that.
I've heard the after dinner chat from MrTait.
I've been in the company of the son of a well known referee when he announced that his father was going to give a penalty against Celtic in a match later that day and that Celtic would not be winning that match. Celtic had a dodgy penalty given against them and didn't win the match. Probably just a coincidence.

Lennon should have kept his trap shut. Better to go on the attack from a position of strength.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I had an interesting discussion with Kenny Clarke about refereeing while I was working with uefa last year.

He says your talking pash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Everything I said is factual and two of the three things are matters of record.
So Kenny is wrong again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he told me an interesting story about the cairo derby, sounds mad

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 46 minutes ago
Magnum

I have a problem with anyone that stirs up conspiracy theories about agendas or bias existing within our game....against anyone

Lot a scheite
Always will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a lot of scheidt.
Some of it is and some of it isn't.
Jim Farry being removed from office is proof of that.
I've heard the after dinner chat from MrTait.
I've been in the company of the son of a well known referee when he announced that his father was going to give a penalty against Celtic in a match later that day and that Celtic would not be winning that match. Celtic had a dodgy penalty given against them and didn't win the match. Probably just a coincidence.

Lennon should have kept his trap shut. Better to go on the attack from a position of strength.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I had an interesting discussion with Kenny Clarke about refereeing while I was working with uefa last year.

He says your talking pash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Everything I said is factual and two of the three things are matters of record.
So Kenny is wrong again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he told me an interesting story about the cairo derby, sounds mad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, cvnt has lots of interesting stories.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHgIeoLhWWg

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 23 minutes ago
What rules were meant to have been changed like?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Potentially the pre-approved seating plan?

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
See if the rumours are correct and Celtic have proof that the ScotGov changed their rules retrospectively to punish Celtic then that really would be incendiary.

What is the FIFA penalty for governments interfering in football? That right, kicked out, no Euros, no CL place etc. Nae luck nippy, nae Indy surge. Nae luck Rangers, nae £40m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some lengths they are stretching to cover for the clusterfluck that is this season

Aye the government made you scheidt in Europe, an embarrassment that just keeps getting worse...

Dearie me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
c’mon you know me better.

Lex.

I you look in, take it easy man and enjoy the break if you feel like one.

This place and social media can be toxic and annoying at times, so getting away from it can be good for body and soul.

Stay safe bud.

Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
See if the rumours are correct and Celtic have proof that the ScotGov changed their rules retrospectively to punish Celtic then that really would be incendiary.

What is the FIFA penalty for governments interfering in football? That right, kicked out, no Euros, no CL place etc. Nae luck nippy, nae Indy surge. Nae luck Rangers, nae £40m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some lengths they are stretching to cover for the clusterfluck that is this season

Aye the government made you scheidt in Europe, an embarrassment that just keeps getting worse...

Dearie me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
c’mon you know me better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you ever think of the Lone Ranger or Tonto, Hey Ho?

For older viewers, perhaps.

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not in any way condoning the trip or what went on but if the government changed the “rules” not only retrospectively but also taking them to a new level that does not apply in any circumstances whatsoever to any other person or business; and then use those rules to ban people from their work then in my mind they should be answerable.

Unless of course you’re happy for the government to interfere in football at any juncture in time and make things up retrospectively to punish anyone they feel like.

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not in any way condoning the trip or what went on but if the government changed the “rules” not only retrospectively but also taking them to a new level that does not apply in any circumstances whatsoever to any other person or business; and then use those rules to ban people from their work then in my mind they should be answerable.

Unless of course you’re happy for the government to interfere in football at any juncture in time and make things up retrospectively to punish anyone they feel like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a chartered flight. Haven't see the particular aircraft but they tend to use ones that are pretty nicely kitted out.

comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not in any way condoning the trip or what went on but if the government changed the “rules” not only retrospectively but also taking them to a new level that does not apply in any circumstances whatsoever to any other person or business; and then use those rules to ban people from their work then in my mind they should be answerable.

Unless of course you’re happy for the government to interfere in football at any juncture in time and make things up retrospectively to punish anyone they feel like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a chartered flight. Haven't see the particular aircraft but they tend to use ones that are pretty nicely kitted out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 meter leg room per row though?

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not in any way condoning the trip or what went on but if the government changed the “rules” not only retrospectively but also taking them to a new level that does not apply in any circumstances whatsoever to any other person or business; and then use those rules to ban people from their work then in my mind they should be answerable.

Unless of course you’re happy for the government to interfere in football at any juncture in time and make things up retrospectively to punish anyone they feel like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a chartered flight. Haven't see the particular aircraft but they tend to use ones that are pretty nicely kitted out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 meter leg room per row though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

During all of the 2m rule; aircraft were permitted to fly passengers for up to hours on end in these conditions as ridiculous as that sounds. I know because I flew a number of times during it.

If they want to change the rules that’s fine. But you don’t do it retrospectively having already given permission and then use the new rules to stop people working.

That’s just ludicrous.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not in any way condoning the trip or what went on but if the government changed the “rules” not only retrospectively but also taking them to a new level that does not apply in any circumstances whatsoever to any other person or business; and then use those rules to ban people from their work then in my mind they should be answerable.

Unless of course you’re happy for the government to interfere in football at any juncture in time and make things up retrospectively to punish anyone they feel like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a chartered flight. Haven't see the particular aircraft but they tend to use ones that are pretty nicely kitted out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 meter leg room per row though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the whole plane is fitted out long haul BC then probably.
But I wouldn't know.
I do know that BA have been flying people out of the UK with no distancing on flights so I'm not sure where the 2m thing comes from.

comment by Zachsda( Declan, put the shark doon that’s the reserves) (U1850)
posted 3 minutes ago
If they want to change the rules that’s fine. But you don’t do it retrospectively having already given permission and then use the new rules to stop people working.

That’s just ludicrous.

Except if it's EBT's
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bastirt

comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Magnum. (U22391)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 21 seconds ago
Interesting to find out what happened there.....but in all honesty mate, for me it's clutching at straws

There is a far bigger picture here, and for me it supercedes all of this

See if ye's didnae go anywhere.....none of this happens

The government, both Scottish and UK, have been telling folk for nearly a year now, that the rules around travel restrictions and quarantine policy, can and will change at short notice for all non essential travel

This was non essential travel
The rules changed
I'm struggling to see past that, and take any defence against it seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what people have said they were on the understanding that 2 meters was the distance required on the plane but that changed to 2 seats in front and 2 seats behind.

Would love to know what plane they were on that 2 seats is more than 2 meters, certainly not one ive ever been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not in any way condoning the trip or what went on but if the government changed the “rules” not only retrospectively but also taking them to a new level that does not apply in any circumstances whatsoever to any other person or business; and then use those rules to ban people from their work then in my mind they should be answerable.

Unless of course you’re happy for the government to interfere in football at any juncture in time and make things up retrospectively to punish anyone they feel like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a chartered flight. Haven't see the particular aircraft but they tend to use ones that are pretty nicely kitted out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 meter leg room per row though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the whole plane is fitted out long haul BC then probably.
But I wouldn't know.
I do know that BA have been flying people out of the UK with no distancing on flights so I'm not sure where the 2m thing comes from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As I said they allowed everyone to travel by aircraft with no additional social distancing. The conditions were that a mask was worn for the duration of the flight and that aircraft have a number of purified air change systems.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Zachsda( Declan, put the shark doon that’s the reserves) (U1850)
posted 2 minutes ago
If Celtic feel they have been harshly treated I have no issues with them raising it and pursuing it.
I think it may fall as it's not the right thing politically
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
But the way they are managing it with Lawwell and Lennon in the media is amateur hour.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Great song
Amateur hour
Sparks