comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 17 seconds ago
All seems like a damp squib to me.

She seems very nervous at times, perhaps understandable, however holding up pretty well.

She is purveying a very personable approach lots of Jeff said this Alex said that, I’ve known these people for years, good friends and colleagues.
Certainly much more so than the officious display from Ek.

Lawyers speak with all answers with a lot of its my recollection, but I understand others may differ.
I don’t have the details to hand but can elaborate if required

The facts are the facts I guess, and the devil is in the detail but unfortunately, she isn’t or shouldn’t be resigning based on what I’ve heard.
Even though that would be nice ….

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I've not watched any of it, just getting BBC "Live" updates but from the quotes it appears she is making it an emotive personal topic whilst the opposition are trying to twist things into a clear black and white topic but with very little evidence other than he said she said

I've not watched any of it, just getting BBC "Live" updates but from the quotes it appears she is making it an emotive personal topic whilst the opposition are trying to twist things into a clear black and white topic but with very little evidence other than he said she said

==

Nothing being twisted.

Business like approach exactly as taken with Ek

Her and Ek taking differing styles

Both to good effect.

Perfect example of the circus that is this inquiry..

https://twitter.com/ChildOfAlba/status/1367084431022899203?s=19

She’s stumbling over the verbal evidence supplied from the others at her meeting at her house.

Committee have said they are both prepared to reiterate their claims if requested. Which they will be.

She keeps trying to change the question round to suit a prepared response. Hmmmm

She's dealt with it fairly well tbh, 7 hours of non stop scrutiny A wee glass of chardonay for her and Peter tonight. Makes me feel so inadequate she's gone through 7 hours of that whilst im posting on ja

comment by rocknrollbhoy (U10410)
posted 6 seconds ago
She's dealt with it fairly well tbh, 7 hours of non stop scrutinyA wee glass of chardonay for her and Peter tonight. Makes me feel so inadequate she's gone through 7 hours of that whilst im posting on ja
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’ll be stunned that I don’t see it quite like that.

All I’ve heard is “not to my knowledge”, “mistakes were made”, “that was an error”, “I don’t believe so” etc etc.

Trying to twist the questions and continue the obfuscation.

She must be the most incompetent and forgetful FM or PM ever if we are to believe her. Which then begs the question as to why she’s in the job.

Can’t have it both ways.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

She understands why people will struggle with the idea she’d forget such an explosive revelation.

Aye. Too right we do.

comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 15 minutes ago
She could set the building on fire (Zach?) and still people would applaud.

Think the same reactions would be expressed were this Johnson in the chair facing the same charges?

I doubt it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the incoherent pash you'd hear if Bozo had to do 7 hrs of this
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A 7 hour mumble session

Tally ho!

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 49 seconds ago
She understands why people will struggle with the idea she’d forget such an explosive revelation.

Aye. Too right we do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I may use it in my interactions with Authority in the future.
"Ah sir, the Sturgeon Defence"
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’ll go far sir

On the basis of this anyway.

Murdos turn to hit a riddy

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

My oh my

She’s forgotten again.

And she doesn’t recollect anything much at all.

Murdo has her pinned right down.

Oo er

Oops

Not my understanding.

Fwck me. How can anyone believe a thing from her? Mental

so what do they think has happened between the 29th and the 2nd?

Every single one of them are liars

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I don't understand that though, why would she go to great lengths to forget about it?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 41 seconds ago
I don't understand that though, why would she go to great lengths to forget about it?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wait?

You genuinely think she has forgotten about what the purpose of the meeting was and what was discussed? Bearing in mind the seriousness of the issu?

Come on. Of course she’s not forgotten. Senior individuals have corroborated that which she is now questioning at this very minute. She’s second guessing what these individuals said and essentially calling them liars.

It’s getting surreal.

comment by rocknrollbhoy (U10410)
posted 8 minutes ago
Murdos turn to hit a riddy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Had to laugh earlier when he asked why Sturgeon hadn't directed the police to investigate someone.. despite it being one of the things he was accusing her of recently 😂

This has got more twists and runs than my annual tax return

The conspiracy theory being out forward, like almost all conspiracy theories doesn't make any sense when subjected to a sliver of scrutiny.