Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 4 seconds ago
So shes doing you a turn
no excuse ginger, you set yourself up for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye I walked into that.
Time for a perfectflow. Usually does the trick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to get one of those
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great investment but not sure how long you have to wait now. Can’t be long surely?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My sons Brother in law had one at xmas, think it was Morretti
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? I haven’t see the Morretti one.
I bought half a dozen when I got the thing. Bit of a mixed bag as it were but included two kegs of Corona. Quite nice as it turns out. Got Stella in just now but I fancy trying that Kwak which today seems maybe appropriate for me.
Morretti will be getting ordered the second I see it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 13 seconds ago
I may be mistaken which beer it wasn't a bog standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is one Italian one I ordered last night. Can’t remember it but I’ve become fond of their ales over the years anyway so hopefully it’s a good un
Menabrea?
Best Italian beer I've ever tasted.
Comes in @ around 5£ + pint 3£ 330 cl but worth it.
TBH we get less scarfy posting on an Old Firm game thread than this.
Nobody's been changed or persuaded which is why I usually avoid
political threads. Having said that I'm gonna start one and hope Zach
posts on it.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
<So its a Two Person Party?>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Covid rules, mate
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers have won) (U1850)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
I may be mistaken which beer it wasn't a bog standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds Ideal?
<Covid rules, mate>
Back in training tomorrow tho they play for Rangers.
https://mobile.twitter.com/monehchickens/status/1367117685335724033?s=24
Sorry I was playing tennis with beers. What's been happening? I'm smashed. Serves me right. More tennis puns
I'll gie ye that Pov.
Her best 11 seconds in over 7 hours.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago
<No.. why don't they actually get the people who were at the meetings in to give testimony.>
If all the evidence was released nae kvnt would need to turn up.
Including Aberdein.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was agreed prior to the committee sitting that evidence could and probably would be retracted in some cases. All parties agreed to that stipulation, given the potential legal repurcussions (contempt of court) and some material being of a sensitive nature (contains confidential info).
If the committee really want to know what Aberdein said to whom, and when it was said.. if it was said at all.. they should get him in to testify. Instead of asking other people who aren't privvy to the information.. as they did countless times today despite Strugeon repeatedly saying she didn't have the information the committee wished to seek.
Today was an attempted showtrial by the Tory/Labour/Lib Dem elements of the committee to pin something, just anything on Strugeon.. and in the process completely ignored their scope. Ignored her answers trying to pursue a line of questioning that is based on a conspiracy theory.
<It was agreed prior to the committee sitting that evidence could and probably would be retracted in some cases. >
Well it shouldn't have been imo.
All of the levers & pulleys in this whole fiasco have been pulled by
SNP appointed officials.
Showtrial my rse.
That's for the Hitler & Stalin regimes.
Scotland is a forward thinking & robust democarcy.
Salmond had to be examined.
Sturgeon had to be examined.
They both got aff wi it so be happy.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 44 seconds ago
how can you corroborate something you weren't present at?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One was present mate.
Look there’s not much point in going on about it. People have made their minds up and are more than happy to take her word for everything so I’ll leave it that the country is run by the most forgetful and incompetent set of a collaborative cabal ever.
Just sit back and let them run it further into the ground. They’ve made a great job of it so far
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were not.Their evidence is that someone who was present told them it.
That "proves" they passed on what they heard about the meeting, not at it.
Were I a defendant i'd expect my lawyer to challenge that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well yes a lawyer would challenge it. And no, nothing has been definitively proven.
People are free to believe what they want. I’m comfortable with my belief. She’s a liar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name me a single politician who isn't a liar 😂
If lying was truly a sackable offence, Rishi Sunak would be packing his bags as we speak given he lied during the Budget today 🤷♂️
Jesus lost count number of times.
Not about lying.
About attempted cover up.
The thing that brought down Nixon.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 4 minutes ago
<It was agreed prior to the committee sitting that evidence could and probably would be retracted in some cases. >
Well it shouldn't have been imo.
All of the levers & pulleys in this whole fiasco have been pulled by
SNP appointed officials.
Showtrial my rse.
That's for the Hitler & Stalin regimes.
Scotland is a forward thinking & robust democarcy.
Salmond had to be examined.
Sturgeon had to be examined.
They both got aff wi it so be happy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't examined though.. she was literally asked the same couple of questions for 7 hours. The questions never changed no matter the evidence or answers she provided. There was no interest by the committee to get to the bottom of all this.. they just kept up with the same line of questioning in the hope she'd slip up and say something they could jump on.
Looking for a smoking gun that doesn't exist 😂
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 5 minutes ago
Jesus lost count number of times.
Not about lying.
About attempted cover up.
The thing that brought down Nixon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cover up of what?
Has yer dealer changed his supplier?
'Must defend ma Nicola'.
Just can't take off the 'Westmonster' blinkers long enough to see that she is an outright liar and not trustworthy of being the FM of Scotland.
Embarrassing.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 15 minutes ago
Jesus lost count number of times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And he had help counting from some cauk.
This isn't the End btw.
The ten unrelated women who brought 13 charges may reconsider.
I see Sturgeon apologised to 2 of them her #Mee tooWummin thing.<boak>
Salmond was acquitted so why is she saying sorry to women who brought
false charges against her Mentor?
Don't gimme Not Proven.
Aww it's cos she's so caring.
Cares about one thing the cow.
Her job & the power that brings.
I know.
That's 2.
Sign in if you want to comment
This nonsense has to stop
Page 35 of 38
34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38
posted on 3/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/3/21
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 4 seconds ago
So shes doing you a turn
no excuse ginger, you set yourself up for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye I walked into that.
Time for a perfectflow. Usually does the trick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to get one of those
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great investment but not sure how long you have to wait now. Can’t be long surely?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My sons Brother in law had one at xmas, think it was Morretti
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? I haven’t see the Morretti one.
I bought half a dozen when I got the thing. Bit of a mixed bag as it were but included two kegs of Corona. Quite nice as it turns out. Got Stella in just now but I fancy trying that Kwak which today seems maybe appropriate for me.
Morretti will be getting ordered the second I see it.
posted on 3/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/3/21
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 13 seconds ago
I may be mistaken which beer it wasn't a bog standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is one Italian one I ordered last night. Can’t remember it but I’ve become fond of their ales over the years anyway so hopefully it’s a good un
posted on 3/3/21
Menabrea?
Best Italian beer I've ever tasted.
Comes in @ around 5£ + pint 3£ 330 cl but worth it.
posted on 3/3/21
TBH we get less scarfy posting on an Old Firm game thread than this.
Nobody's been changed or persuaded which is why I usually avoid
political threads. Having said that I'm gonna start one and hope Zach
posts on it.
posted on 3/3/21
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
<So its a Two Person Party?>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Covid rules, mate
posted on 3/3/21
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers have won) (U1850)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
I may be mistaken which beer it wasn't a bog standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds Ideal?
posted on 3/3/21
<Covid rules, mate>
Back in training tomorrow tho they play for Rangers.
posted on 3/3/21
https://mobile.twitter.com/monehchickens/status/1367117685335724033?s=24
posted on 3/3/21
Sorry I was playing tennis with beers. What's been happening? I'm smashed. Serves me right. More tennis puns
posted on 3/3/21
I'll gie ye that Pov.
Her best 11 seconds in over 7 hours.
posted on 3/3/21
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago
<No.. why don't they actually get the people who were at the meetings in to give testimony.>
If all the evidence was released nae kvnt would need to turn up.
Including Aberdein.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was agreed prior to the committee sitting that evidence could and probably would be retracted in some cases. All parties agreed to that stipulation, given the potential legal repurcussions (contempt of court) and some material being of a sensitive nature (contains confidential info).
If the committee really want to know what Aberdein said to whom, and when it was said.. if it was said at all.. they should get him in to testify. Instead of asking other people who aren't privvy to the information.. as they did countless times today despite Strugeon repeatedly saying she didn't have the information the committee wished to seek.
Today was an attempted showtrial by the Tory/Labour/Lib Dem elements of the committee to pin something, just anything on Strugeon.. and in the process completely ignored their scope. Ignored her answers trying to pursue a line of questioning that is based on a conspiracy theory.
posted on 3/3/21
<It was agreed prior to the committee sitting that evidence could and probably would be retracted in some cases. >
Well it shouldn't have been imo.
All of the levers & pulleys in this whole fiasco have been pulled by
SNP appointed officials.
Showtrial my rse.
That's for the Hitler & Stalin regimes.
Scotland is a forward thinking & robust democarcy.
Salmond had to be examined.
Sturgeon had to be examined.
They both got aff wi it so be happy.
posted on 3/3/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda( He’s gone, the shark throwers h... (U1850)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 44 seconds ago
how can you corroborate something you weren't present at?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One was present mate.
Look there’s not much point in going on about it. People have made their minds up and are more than happy to take her word for everything so I’ll leave it that the country is run by the most forgetful and incompetent set of a collaborative cabal ever.
Just sit back and let them run it further into the ground. They’ve made a great job of it so far
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were not.Their evidence is that someone who was present told them it.
That "proves" they passed on what they heard about the meeting, not at it.
Were I a defendant i'd expect my lawyer to challenge that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well yes a lawyer would challenge it. And no, nothing has been definitively proven.
People are free to believe what they want. I’m comfortable with my belief. She’s a liar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name me a single politician who isn't a liar 😂
If lying was truly a sackable offence, Rishi Sunak would be packing his bags as we speak given he lied during the Budget today 🤷♂️
posted on 3/3/21
Jesus lost count number of times.
Not about lying.
About attempted cover up.
The thing that brought down Nixon.
posted on 3/3/21
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 4 minutes ago
<It was agreed prior to the committee sitting that evidence could and probably would be retracted in some cases. >
Well it shouldn't have been imo.
All of the levers & pulleys in this whole fiasco have been pulled by
SNP appointed officials.
Showtrial my rse.
That's for the Hitler & Stalin regimes.
Scotland is a forward thinking & robust democarcy.
Salmond had to be examined.
Sturgeon had to be examined.
They both got aff wi it so be happy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't examined though.. she was literally asked the same couple of questions for 7 hours. The questions never changed no matter the evidence or answers she provided. There was no interest by the committee to get to the bottom of all this.. they just kept up with the same line of questioning in the hope she'd slip up and say something they could jump on.
Looking for a smoking gun that doesn't exist 😂
posted on 3/3/21
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 5 minutes ago
Jesus lost count number of times.
Not about lying.
About attempted cover up.
The thing that brought down Nixon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cover up of what?
posted on 3/3/21
posted on 3/3/21
Has yer dealer changed his supplier?
posted on 3/3/21
'Must defend ma Nicola'.
Just can't take off the 'Westmonster' blinkers long enough to see that she is an outright liar and not trustworthy of being the FM of Scotland.
Embarrassing.
posted on 3/3/21
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 15 minutes ago
Jesus lost count number of times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And he had help counting from some cauk.
posted on 3/3/21
This isn't the End btw.
The ten unrelated women who brought 13 charges may reconsider.
I see Sturgeon apologised to 2 of them her #Mee tooWummin thing.<boak>
Salmond was acquitted so why is she saying sorry to women who brought
false charges against her Mentor?
Don't gimme Not Proven.
posted on 3/3/21
Aww it's cos she's so caring.
Cares about one thing the cow.
Her job & the power that brings.
I know.
That's 2.
Page 35 of 38
34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38