Mbappe but Rashford over both

Seeing we’ll get neither, I’ll opt for default of rashford..

Haaland is decent in the air, decent with both feet, and has bags of pace to burn when playing in a swashbuckling Dortmund side.

He's also a big lad who has shown he can play with his back to goal for extended periods and act as a foil for less glamorous teammates when representing Norway.

Arteta could do with a player like him.

Age old comes down to what you need. Haaland for a striker, then mbpappe is a superior version of rashford, quite a bit better toio. So for a wide forward, you’d want one of those two over Haaland. Rashford is still a top player. He’s looked tired and injured recently, but he’s great in full flow.,could make better decisions at times.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Haabappe

comment by Culér (U9489)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Mbappe but Rashford over both
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culér (U9489)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Mbappe but Rashford over both
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This soft сunt is actually serious

comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culér (U9489)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Mbappe but Rashford over both
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This soft сunt is actually serious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s what’s funny!

Haaland

Rashford plays in a far superior league to both of them and has stupidly good stats.

Swap Rashford for either of those two and Marcus would excel in Paris and Dortmund yet they’d not do as well at United

Haaland. Mbappe is quality but gets overrated.

comment by Gillespie Rd. (U18361)
posted 3 hours, 3 minutes ago
Haaland is decent in the air, decent with both feet, and has bags of pace to burn when playing in a swashbuckling Dortmund side.

He's also a big lad who has shown he can play with his back to goal for extended periods and act as a foil for less glamorous teammates when representing Norway.

Arteta could do with a player like him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Virgil Van Dyke out sprinted him like he was standing in cement, he's not fast

Mbappe.

He’s ridiculous.

Sancho.

Cavani is better than Haaland or Mbappe and we need a RW to allow us to bench Greenwood and Amad.

Cavani is not better than Haaland or mbappe.

Why is rashford even in the same convo as mbappe and haaland? This isn't a school dinner article 😅

Got to laugh at the folks here falling for Mur and Culer.

comment by CurrentlyStuckIntheUK (U11181)
posted 30 minutes ago
Got to laugh at the folks here falling for Mur and Culer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer is a good wum or a facking moron. Hopefully it’s the former

Definitely Mbappe. Would consider Haaland if he didn't have Raiola representing him.

Nothing for me to think about: I would chose Haaland by a mile.