comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
The CAS found that “leaked email number four is in fact a combination of two separate emails” which gives a “somewhat distorted impression”, and they based their decision on the originals, rather than the hacked versions published by Der Spiegel.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-cas-verdict-ffp-18678521
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That article doesn't specify what those specific emails were about. Nor does the article mention any claims about Mancini's payment. The article refers to sponsorship payments being disguised.
So try again. Do you have any evidence that the Der Spiegel claims were fabricated?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have any evidence they weren't considering the CAS threw the case out on the 2nd day as it was so obvious the emails quoted in Der Speigel were obviously fake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Considering this specific incident was from before the time limitation it seems like that was actually the reason it would have been thrown out (if it was part of the CAS case which was focused on disguising sponsorship).
It is impossible to prove that something didn't exist so it is impossible to prove that fake emails don't exist. You are the one claiming the emails are fake and so you have the burden of proof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CAS is all the proof we need. No need for us to prove anything, you are the one bigging up the fake details, come back when you have some proof.
Until then we will just call you out for the sad little man that you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't seem to realise that declaring something beyond the time limited period doesn't suggest it didn't happen. It actually suggests it did happen but was too long ago to do anything about.
Interesting that your argument is so weak that you have to jump to personal insults so quickly though. Ever though of having a discussion like a grown up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not a grown up conversation you are having, you are just trying to find something that isn't there and you can't prove.
I'm just calling you out on this, a sad little man is quite polite in the circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or because it is the team that you support, you have co pletely dismissed the reports written in a well respected and long established investigative journal, and you resort to insults because that is all that you have.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
The CAS found that “leaked email number four is in fact a combination of two separate emails” which gives a “somewhat distorted impression”, and they based their decision on the originals, rather than the hacked versions published by Der Spiegel.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-cas-verdict-ffp-18678521
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That article doesn't specify what those specific emails were about. Nor does the article mention any claims about Mancini's payment. The article refers to sponsorship payments being disguised.
So try again. Do you have any evidence that the Der Spiegel claims were fabricated?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have any evidence they weren't considering the CAS threw the case out on the 2nd day as it was so obvious the emails quoted in Der Speigel were obviously fake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Considering this specific incident was from before the time limitation it seems like that was actually the reason it would have been thrown out (if it was part of the CAS case which was focused on disguising sponsorship).
It is impossible to prove that something didn't exist so it is impossible to prove that fake emails don't exist. You are the one claiming the emails are fake and so you have the burden of proof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CAS is all the proof we need. No need for us to prove anything, you are the one bigging up the fake details, come back when you have some proof.
Until then we will just call you out for the sad little man that you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't seem to realise that declaring something beyond the time limited period doesn't suggest it didn't happen. It actually suggests it did happen but was too long ago to do anything about.
Interesting that your argument is so weak that you have to jump to personal insults so quickly though. Ever though of having a discussion like a grown up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not a grown up conversation you are having, you are just trying to find something that isn't there and you can't prove.
I'm just calling you out on this, a sad little man is quite polite in the circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or because it is the team that you support, you have co pletely dismissed the reports written in a well respected and long established investigative journal, and you resort to insults because that is all that you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, its because I know you will go on and on and on about it with no proof, thats why I called you a sad little man.
The proof is in the Der Spiegel report. That is evidence. Unless you are can show that the specific report about Mancini was fabricated then we have an evidence claim that it happened and your lack of evidence that the report was made up.
You knew this though, and so had to resort to personal insults.
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 26 minutes ago
Amazon ran at a loss for the first 8 years of their existence.
Should they not be regarded as a profitable company because of that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now that is a terrible analogy. What was it you were saying about straw clutching?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was using that anaolgy 5/6 years ago when people were asking how can City keep losing money every season but continue to operate.
Amazon at the time were just starting to break even.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I claimed any specific story is about Liverpool is untrue?
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 25 minutes ago
The proof is in the Der Spiegel report. That is evidence. Unless you are can show that the specific report about Mancini was fabricated then we have an evidence claim that it happened and your lack of evidence that the report was made up.
You knew this though, and so had to resort to personal insults.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right, lovely chatting to you welsh.I will let you crack on now.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That appears to be the theme 😂
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but no but. I have no idea if City are interested in either, I don’t think I’ve said they are. But you’ve taken a spurious rumour about something that has virtually no chance of happening and using to claim Liverpool fans are being hypocritical about finances.
Not bright are you?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
Aimed more at Terms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I claimed it?
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That appears to be the theme 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We must also prove that its not true even though there are no facts that point to it being true, simple really.
Haven’t read the full thread, but I suspect this discussion can be surmised as follows:
Fans who don’t support City are making all kind of claims in regards to City’s accounts, based on media reports.
City fans in return are refuting those claims.
No one here - NO ONE - knows about City’s accounts. If they are using Der Speigel as their source, then they are using a source that has already been discredited.
No one - again NO ONE - can make any claim to be absolute fact.
Anyone who does leaves themselves open to ridicule.
In all honesty, this is pathetic. City bid big for a player. Opposition fans moan about it. The media report that City will bid big for a player, opposition fans will moan about it.
Opposition fans are pathetic.
No matter how much you impotent fools moan, nothing will change. City will still bid big if that’s what their intention is.
Opposition fans just, bla bla bla, don’t like it.
Oh, and let me guess before I scroll back through the thread,
It’s Liverpool fans moaning about this isn’t it?
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 34 minutes ago
Haven’t read the full thread, but I suspect this discussion can be surmised as follows:
Fans who don’t support City are making all kind of claims in regards to City’s accounts, based on media reports.
City fans in return are refuting those claims.
No one here - NO ONE - knows about City’s accounts. If they are using Der Speigel as their source, then they are using a source that has already been discredited.
No one - again NO ONE - can make any claim to be absolute fact.
Anyone who does leaves themselves open to ridicule.
In all honesty, this is pathetic. City bid big for a player. Opposition fans moan about it. The media report that City will bid big for a player, opposition fans will moan about it.
Opposition fans are pathetic.
No matter how much you impotent fools moan, nothing will change. City will still bid big if that’s what their intention is.
Opposition fans just, bla bla bla, don’t like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No need to get so upset
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but no but. I have no idea if City are interested in either, I don’t think I’ve said they are. But you’ve taken a spurious rumour about something that has virtually no chance of happening and using to claim Liverpool fans are being hypocritical about finances.
Not bright are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a 6 page thread based on paper gossip but you only have a problem with the Liverpool paper gossip. Who would of seen that one coming 🤔
Most expensive player in world football?
Who’s that then?
Liverpool fans concerned about the way Mancini was paid before FFP was even introduced.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 20 minutes ago
Liverpool fans concerned about the way Mancini was paid before FFP was even introduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem pretty desperate to deflect there Boris.
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but no but. I have no idea if City are interested in either, I don’t think I’ve said they are. But you’ve taken a spurious rumour about something that has virtually no chance of happening and using to claim Liverpool fans are being hypocritical about finances.
Not bright are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a 6 page thread based on paper gossip but you only have a problem with the Liverpool paper gossip. Who would of seen that one coming 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mbappe rumour is the least likely of the three and almost certainly just clickbait, yet you’ve convinced yourself it’s genuine. Kane and/or Grealish are far more realistic and I’d be very surprised if City weren’t in for at least one of them.
I’ve already said I have no idea if the City rumours are true, and I’ve not involved myself with that email nonsense because I have no idea or interest in that either.
You’re basically just throwing out the cliched comebacks because you know how thick you’ve been for falling for the clickbait rumours….
“The Mbappe rumour is the least likely of the three”
So you’re not sure if the Kane or Grealish rumours are true. And you’ve no interest in the email nonesense. But
youre taking a stand on this one because the Mbappe rumour is the least likely to be true
Amazing phenomenon here.
Man City can't even gain international fans because even though people across the world may have their differences, one thing we have in common is that nobody likes a cheat.
They should change their name to Denial FC
Sign in if you want to comment
Grealish & Kane to City
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
The CAS found that “leaked email number four is in fact a combination of two separate emails” which gives a “somewhat distorted impression”, and they based their decision on the originals, rather than the hacked versions published by Der Spiegel.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-cas-verdict-ffp-18678521
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That article doesn't specify what those specific emails were about. Nor does the article mention any claims about Mancini's payment. The article refers to sponsorship payments being disguised.
So try again. Do you have any evidence that the Der Spiegel claims were fabricated?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have any evidence they weren't considering the CAS threw the case out on the 2nd day as it was so obvious the emails quoted in Der Speigel were obviously fake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Considering this specific incident was from before the time limitation it seems like that was actually the reason it would have been thrown out (if it was part of the CAS case which was focused on disguising sponsorship).
It is impossible to prove that something didn't exist so it is impossible to prove that fake emails don't exist. You are the one claiming the emails are fake and so you have the burden of proof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CAS is all the proof we need. No need for us to prove anything, you are the one bigging up the fake details, come back when you have some proof.
Until then we will just call you out for the sad little man that you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't seem to realise that declaring something beyond the time limited period doesn't suggest it didn't happen. It actually suggests it did happen but was too long ago to do anything about.
Interesting that your argument is so weak that you have to jump to personal insults so quickly though. Ever though of having a discussion like a grown up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not a grown up conversation you are having, you are just trying to find something that isn't there and you can't prove.
I'm just calling you out on this, a sad little man is quite polite in the circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or because it is the team that you support, you have co pletely dismissed the reports written in a well respected and long established investigative journal, and you resort to insults because that is all that you have.
posted on 28/6/21
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
The CAS found that “leaked email number four is in fact a combination of two separate emails” which gives a “somewhat distorted impression”, and they based their decision on the originals, rather than the hacked versions published by Der Spiegel.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-cas-verdict-ffp-18678521
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That article doesn't specify what those specific emails were about. Nor does the article mention any claims about Mancini's payment. The article refers to sponsorship payments being disguised.
So try again. Do you have any evidence that the Der Spiegel claims were fabricated?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have any evidence they weren't considering the CAS threw the case out on the 2nd day as it was so obvious the emails quoted in Der Speigel were obviously fake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Considering this specific incident was from before the time limitation it seems like that was actually the reason it would have been thrown out (if it was part of the CAS case which was focused on disguising sponsorship).
It is impossible to prove that something didn't exist so it is impossible to prove that fake emails don't exist. You are the one claiming the emails are fake and so you have the burden of proof.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CAS is all the proof we need. No need for us to prove anything, you are the one bigging up the fake details, come back when you have some proof.
Until then we will just call you out for the sad little man that you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't seem to realise that declaring something beyond the time limited period doesn't suggest it didn't happen. It actually suggests it did happen but was too long ago to do anything about.
Interesting that your argument is so weak that you have to jump to personal insults so quickly though. Ever though of having a discussion like a grown up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not a grown up conversation you are having, you are just trying to find something that isn't there and you can't prove.
I'm just calling you out on this, a sad little man is quite polite in the circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or because it is the team that you support, you have co pletely dismissed the reports written in a well respected and long established investigative journal, and you resort to insults because that is all that you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, its because I know you will go on and on and on about it with no proof, thats why I called you a sad little man.
posted on 28/6/21
The proof is in the Der Spiegel report. That is evidence. Unless you are can show that the specific report about Mancini was fabricated then we have an evidence claim that it happened and your lack of evidence that the report was made up.
You knew this though, and so had to resort to personal insults.
posted on 28/6/21
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 26 minutes ago
Amazon ran at a loss for the first 8 years of their existence.
Should they not be regarded as a profitable company because of that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now that is a terrible analogy. What was it you were saying about straw clutching?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was using that anaolgy 5/6 years ago when people were asking how can City keep losing money every season but continue to operate.
Amazon at the time were just starting to break even.
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I claimed any specific story is about Liverpool is untrue?
posted on 28/6/21
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 25 minutes ago
The proof is in the Der Spiegel report. That is evidence. Unless you are can show that the specific report about Mancini was fabricated then we have an evidence claim that it happened and your lack of evidence that the report was made up.
You knew this though, and so had to resort to personal insults.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right, lovely chatting to you welsh.I will let you crack on now.
posted on 28/6/21
Aimed more at Terms.
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That appears to be the theme 😂
posted on 28/6/21
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but no but. I have no idea if City are interested in either, I don’t think I’ve said they are. But you’ve taken a spurious rumour about something that has virtually no chance of happening and using to claim Liverpool fans are being hypocritical about finances.
Not bright are you?
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
Aimed more at Terms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I claimed it?
posted on 28/6/21
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
So the rules are:
Anying negative written about Liverpool in the media is blatenly false.
Anything negative written about City in the media has to be true because it's..er in the media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That appears to be the theme 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We must also prove that its not true even though there are no facts that point to it being true, simple really.
posted on 28/6/21
Haven’t read the full thread, but I suspect this discussion can be surmised as follows:
Fans who don’t support City are making all kind of claims in regards to City’s accounts, based on media reports.
City fans in return are refuting those claims.
No one here - NO ONE - knows about City’s accounts. If they are using Der Speigel as their source, then they are using a source that has already been discredited.
No one - again NO ONE - can make any claim to be absolute fact.
Anyone who does leaves themselves open to ridicule.
In all honesty, this is pathetic. City bid big for a player. Opposition fans moan about it. The media report that City will bid big for a player, opposition fans will moan about it.
Opposition fans are pathetic.
No matter how much you impotent fools moan, nothing will change. City will still bid big if that’s what their intention is.
Opposition fans just, bla bla bla, don’t like it.
posted on 28/6/21
Oh, and let me guess before I scroll back through the thread,
It’s Liverpool fans moaning about this isn’t it?
posted on 28/6/21
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 34 minutes ago
Haven’t read the full thread, but I suspect this discussion can be surmised as follows:
Fans who don’t support City are making all kind of claims in regards to City’s accounts, based on media reports.
City fans in return are refuting those claims.
No one here - NO ONE - knows about City’s accounts. If they are using Der Speigel as their source, then they are using a source that has already been discredited.
No one - again NO ONE - can make any claim to be absolute fact.
Anyone who does leaves themselves open to ridicule.
In all honesty, this is pathetic. City bid big for a player. Opposition fans moan about it. The media report that City will bid big for a player, opposition fans will moan about it.
Opposition fans are pathetic.
No matter how much you impotent fools moan, nothing will change. City will still bid big if that’s what their intention is.
Opposition fans just, bla bla bla, don’t like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No need to get so upset
posted on 28/6/21
Bla bla
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but no but. I have no idea if City are interested in either, I don’t think I’ve said they are. But you’ve taken a spurious rumour about something that has virtually no chance of happening and using to claim Liverpool fans are being hypocritical about finances.
Not bright are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a 6 page thread based on paper gossip but you only have a problem with the Liverpool paper gossip. Who would of seen that one coming 🤔
posted on 28/6/21
Most expensive player in world football?
Who’s that then?
posted on 28/6/21
Liverpool fans concerned about the way Mancini was paid before FFP was even introduced.
posted on 28/6/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 20 minutes ago
Liverpool fans concerned about the way Mancini was paid before FFP was even introduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem pretty desperate to deflect there Boris.
posted on 28/6/21
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 27 seconds ago
Liverpool try to claim furlough, their manager cries poverty all season and then you make enquiries about the most expensive player in world football. Worst thing is most of your fans lap it up and actually think you’re hard done by 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually taking those rumours seriously? You’re the only fool lapping anything up, it’s embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas Kane and Grealish to City is a done deal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but no but. I have no idea if City are interested in either, I don’t think I’ve said they are. But you’ve taken a spurious rumour about something that has virtually no chance of happening and using to claim Liverpool fans are being hypocritical about finances.
Not bright are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a 6 page thread based on paper gossip but you only have a problem with the Liverpool paper gossip. Who would of seen that one coming 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mbappe rumour is the least likely of the three and almost certainly just clickbait, yet you’ve convinced yourself it’s genuine. Kane and/or Grealish are far more realistic and I’d be very surprised if City weren’t in for at least one of them.
I’ve already said I have no idea if the City rumours are true, and I’ve not involved myself with that email nonsense because I have no idea or interest in that either.
You’re basically just throwing out the cliched comebacks because you know how thick you’ve been for falling for the clickbait rumours….
posted on 28/6/21
“The Mbappe rumour is the least likely of the three”
So you’re not sure if the Kane or Grealish rumours are true. And you’ve no interest in the email nonesense. But
youre taking a stand on this one because the Mbappe rumour is the least likely to be true
posted on 29/6/21
Amazing phenomenon here.
Man City can't even gain international fans because even though people across the world may have their differences, one thing we have in common is that nobody likes a cheat.
They should change their name to Denial FC
posted on 29/6/21
Good one
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7