comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 6 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/GarryCarmody/status/1419269712064786434
Convicted horse-puncher and, despite appearances, actually not a bear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine giving g your child a first name of angry, no wonder he ended up as he is in life
If Celtic get £20m for Eddy after the season he's had and with one year left on his contract then they've played a blinder. Wouldn't be surprised if bids were coming in at half of that.
Be interesting to see how it goes the closer it gets to the window. He's effectively a free agent on 1st September so the closer it gets it becomes about who is more desperate - the buying club to get their primary target for the new season or the selling club to avoid missing out on a significant amount of money in the midst of a pandemic.
the clubs he is linked with need to roll the dice so thats handy.
he's a top talent but he clearly isnt giving it his all for us
The 50% sell-on fee due to PSG is quite a hit to take.
Is it up to 50% sell on fee now?
I thought we were only up to 40%
Is next week 70%?
When do we ignore profits?
Yeah if you are Brighton you probably want him in now for the season ahead.
Thing is we talk about how great a deal it is for him and the likes of Ajer for that money but it's also a great deal for the buying club in the current market. If Ajer does well there then next season based on market rate Brentford will double their money. If Ed gets 20 goals down there and they have a good season they make easy profit on that.
i think he probably fancies bigger than brighton but if thats his choices then unlucky
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah if you are Brighton you probably want him in now for the season ahead.
Thing is we talk about how great a deal it is for him and the likes of Ajer for that money but it's also a great deal for the buying club in the current market. If Ajer does well there then next season based on market rate Brentford will double their money. If Ed gets 20 goals down there and they have a good season they make easy profit on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's why it's important to negotiate a sell-on clause should a player's next fee goes for over a certain amount.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 31 minutes ago
Is it up to 50% sell on fee now?
I thought we were only up to 40%
Is next week 70%?
When do we ignore profits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heard we're actually paying Brighton to take him, and we still owe PSG 150% of whatever we pay Brighton.
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
comment by #55 Has Ruined Them! (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That site is using the Daily Record as its source. So make of that what you will.
comment by Miller - Dedicated Follower of Fashion (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by #55 Has Ruined Them! (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That site is using the Daily Record as its source. So make of that what you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The famous Football Transfer Tavern website, who use the Daily Record as their source, who say in their report that they understand...
Considering we paid £9 million for him, that he had by his standards last season a poor season (think he was still top goalscorer?!), and is going into the last year of his contract - if we make £5 million profit on him, that still seems a bit of a result for me.
comment by Miller - Dedicated Follower of Fashion (U9310)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by #55 Has Ruined Them! (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That site is using the Daily Record as its source. So make of that what you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you see - the Daily Record were not the only source as witnessed by this statement:
"Reports over the last 12 months have suggested Celtic would need to give 40% or 50% of any deal to the French giants after they signed Edouard for over £9m in 2018."
"However, according to the Daily Record, Parkhead chiefs need to give PSG 50% of any profit they make on the striker."
Another media outlet:
"GIVEMESPORT can reveal that Paris Saint-Germain inserted a substantial sell-on clause into his deal when moving to Celtic of around 50%. With that in mind, the Hoops are looking for around £20m if they were to sell. "
Having been brought in for a club-record £9m in the summer of 2018 after a successful one-year loan, the Scottish giants are seeking to make some sort of profit on the player, though will have to pay around half of it back to the French champions after a clause was inserted into the initial deal.
I know fans want the lower/higher sell-on % to be true when it suits the narrative/purpose.
Just a wee bit 'scarfy'.
You can't expect just to say "The deal is 30% of any profit" and not be challenged on it.
It's the same when supporters say "we got £20m for him" when the figure is actually way lower or "we only paid £5m" for him when the figure may be as much as double that.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Zachsda( Thumb’s a fat six goals a season waster) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Back To Being Just My POV (U10636)
posted 9 minutes ago
The famous Football Transfer Tavern website, who use the Daily Record as their source, who say in their report that they understand...
Considering we paid £9 million for him, that he had by his standards last season a poor season (think he was still top goalscorer?!), and is going into the last year of his contract - if we make £5 million profit on him, that still seems a bit of a result for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just glad he’s away
Annoying coont scored too many goals
Don’t care how much money you get it’s about how it’s invested
We welcome the chase
Not so much the chaste, they’re a bit needy like the humble
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's not away yet though.
It's not like someone has started an article saying he's defo away for £25 million and that's a fair price...
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Zachsda( Thumb’s a fat six goals a season waster) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Back To Being Just My POV (U10636)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda( Thumb’s a fat six goals a season waster) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Back To Being Just My POV (U10636)
posted 9 minutes ago
The famous Football Transfer Tavern website, who use the Daily Record as their source, who say in their report that they understand...
Considering we paid £9 million for him, that he had by his standards last season a poor season (think he was still top goalscorer?!), and is going into the last year of his contract - if we make £5 million profit on him, that still seems a bit of a result for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just glad he’s away
Annoying coont scored too many goals
Don’t care how much money you get it’s about how it’s invested
We welcome the chase
Not so much the chaste, they’re a bit needy like the humble
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's not away yet though.
It's not like someone has started an article saying he's defo away for £25 million and that's a fair price...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I bow to your superior knowledge
I was just trying to be nice and a fud in one post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
half way there then...
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
i think he probably fancies bigger than brighton but if thats his choices then unlucky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I’m sure Eddy fancies a bigger club than Brighton. Would have got one too, if he hadn’t downed tools for the last 12 months and counting. Thick coont.
Sign in if you want to comment
Football/Pre Season
Page 4 of 5
posted on 26/7/21
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 6 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/GarryCarmody/status/1419269712064786434
Convicted horse-puncher and, despite appearances, actually not a bear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine giving g your child a first name of angry, no wonder he ended up as he is in life
posted on 26/7/21
Mad Magwa
posted on 26/7/21
If Celtic get £20m for Eddy after the season he's had and with one year left on his contract then they've played a blinder. Wouldn't be surprised if bids were coming in at half of that.
posted on 26/7/21
Be interesting to see how it goes the closer it gets to the window. He's effectively a free agent on 1st September so the closer it gets it becomes about who is more desperate - the buying club to get their primary target for the new season or the selling club to avoid missing out on a significant amount of money in the midst of a pandemic.
posted on 26/7/21
the clubs he is linked with need to roll the dice so thats handy.
he's a top talent but he clearly isnt giving it his all for us
posted on 26/7/21
The 50% sell-on fee due to PSG is quite a hit to take.
posted on 26/7/21
Is it up to 50% sell on fee now?
I thought we were only up to 40%
Is next week 70%?
When do we ignore profits?
posted on 26/7/21
Yeah if you are Brighton you probably want him in now for the season ahead.
Thing is we talk about how great a deal it is for him and the likes of Ajer for that money but it's also a great deal for the buying club in the current market. If Ajer does well there then next season based on market rate Brentford will double their money. If Ed gets 20 goals down there and they have a good season they make easy profit on that.
posted on 26/7/21
i think he probably fancies bigger than brighton but if thats his choices then unlucky
posted on 26/7/21
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah if you are Brighton you probably want him in now for the season ahead.
Thing is we talk about how great a deal it is for him and the likes of Ajer for that money but it's also a great deal for the buying club in the current market. If Ajer does well there then next season based on market rate Brentford will double their money. If Ed gets 20 goals down there and they have a good season they make easy profit on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's why it's important to negotiate a sell-on clause should a player's next fee goes for over a certain amount.
posted on 26/7/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/21
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 31 minutes ago
Is it up to 50% sell on fee now?
I thought we were only up to 40%
Is next week 70%?
When do we ignore profits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heard we're actually paying Brighton to take him, and we still owe PSG 150% of whatever we pay Brighton.
posted on 26/7/21
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
posted on 26/7/21
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
posted on 26/7/21
comment by #55 Has Ruined Them! (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That site is using the Daily Record as its source. So make of that what you will.
posted on 26/7/21
comment by Miller - Dedicated Follower of Fashion (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by #55 Has Ruined Them! (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That site is using the Daily Record as its source. So make of that what you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 26/7/21
The famous Football Transfer Tavern website, who use the Daily Record as their source, who say in their report that they understand...
Considering we paid £9 million for him, that he had by his standards last season a poor season (think he was still top goalscorer?!), and is going into the last year of his contract - if we make £5 million profit on him, that still seems a bit of a result for me.
posted on 26/7/21
comment by Miller - Dedicated Follower of Fashion (U9310)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by #55 Has Ruined Them! (U22266)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 9 minutes ago
The deal is 30% of any profit. So if he goes for £20 million then PSG get 30% of £11 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This suggests differently...
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/celtic-news/celtic-odsonne-edouard-sell-on-clause-revealed/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That site is using the Daily Record as its source. So make of that what you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you see - the Daily Record were not the only source as witnessed by this statement:
"Reports over the last 12 months have suggested Celtic would need to give 40% or 50% of any deal to the French giants after they signed Edouard for over £9m in 2018."
"However, according to the Daily Record, Parkhead chiefs need to give PSG 50% of any profit they make on the striker."
Another media outlet:
"GIVEMESPORT can reveal that Paris Saint-Germain inserted a substantial sell-on clause into his deal when moving to Celtic of around 50%. With that in mind, the Hoops are looking for around £20m if they were to sell. "
Having been brought in for a club-record £9m in the summer of 2018 after a successful one-year loan, the Scottish giants are seeking to make some sort of profit on the player, though will have to pay around half of it back to the French champions after a clause was inserted into the initial deal.
I know fans want the lower/higher sell-on % to be true when it suits the narrative/purpose.
Just a wee bit 'scarfy'.
You can't expect just to say "The deal is 30% of any profit" and not be challenged on it.
posted on 26/7/21
It's the same when supporters say "we got £20m for him" when the figure is actually way lower or "we only paid £5m" for him when the figure may be as much as double that.
posted on 26/7/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/21
comment by Zachsda( Thumb’s a fat six goals a season waster) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Back To Being Just My POV (U10636)
posted 9 minutes ago
The famous Football Transfer Tavern website, who use the Daily Record as their source, who say in their report that they understand...
Considering we paid £9 million for him, that he had by his standards last season a poor season (think he was still top goalscorer?!), and is going into the last year of his contract - if we make £5 million profit on him, that still seems a bit of a result for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just glad he’s away
Annoying coont scored too many goals
Don’t care how much money you get it’s about how it’s invested
We welcome the chase
Not so much the chaste, they’re a bit needy like the humble
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's not away yet though.
It's not like someone has started an article saying he's defo away for £25 million and that's a fair price...
posted on 26/7/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/21
comment by Zachsda( Thumb’s a fat six goals a season waster) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Back To Being Just My POV (U10636)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda( Thumb’s a fat six goals a season waster) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Back To Being Just My POV (U10636)
posted 9 minutes ago
The famous Football Transfer Tavern website, who use the Daily Record as their source, who say in their report that they understand...
Considering we paid £9 million for him, that he had by his standards last season a poor season (think he was still top goalscorer?!), and is going into the last year of his contract - if we make £5 million profit on him, that still seems a bit of a result for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just glad he’s away
Annoying coont scored too many goals
Don’t care how much money you get it’s about how it’s invested
We welcome the chase
Not so much the chaste, they’re a bit needy like the humble
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's not away yet though.
It's not like someone has started an article saying he's defo away for £25 million and that's a fair price...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I bow to your superior knowledge
I was just trying to be nice and a fud in one post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
half way there then...
posted on 26/7/21
*floated cross*
posted on 26/7/21
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
i think he probably fancies bigger than brighton but if thats his choices then unlucky
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I’m sure Eddy fancies a bigger club than Brighton. Would have got one too, if he hadn’t downed tools for the last 12 months and counting. Thick coont.
Page 4 of 5