comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they sold Aguero and only have Jesus going into the new season. Haaland not available and he has a very good agent unlike Kane.
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 31 seconds ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. From a rival club fans point of view, whatever you get out of city doesn't weaken their financial position one iota, but the more you get the more it strengthens Spurs.
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
comment by Troy'sTanguyTanganga (U6468)
posted 26 minutes ago
Was there even a bid for him.
Both clubs denied that there was one.
Why is he throwing a strop if there has not been a bid?
Grealish is citehs priority signing it seems. I Kane wants a move he should get his agent to get clubs interested in him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane will have been in dialogue with City for months, he will know they are prepared to buy him. The issue is how much City are willing to pay, they want him on the cheap. Spurs should never accept less than than their valuation, especially from those oil money doped caaants.
The Kane brothers coming across as a right pair of knuckleheads in this saga. He should have gotten a proper agent
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's also no guarantee City won't win the league this season, with or without Kane.
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 14 seconds ago
The Kane brothers coming across as a right pair of knuckleheads in this saga. He should have gotten a proper agent
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. If they had a gentleman's agreement you cannot blame them for acting the way they are. Other plauers have done the same. It's normal really.
I think people are too focused about the price tag.
For example I reckon £100m up front rather than £130m spread over five years would be of greater use to Spurs at this time.
Looks likely he's going though and if has to forgoe loyalty payments and so on to do so that again will affect the price.
If he winds up at City on £300k a week then he's been very well advised if we're honest.
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's also no guarantee City won't win the league this season, with or without Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they sign Grealish and Kane, make no mistake the league is their's for the taking.
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's also no guarantee City won't win the league this season, with or without Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they sign Grealish and Kane, make no mistake the league is their's for the taking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is anyway, even if they don't. They piiissed it last year.
If they don't sign either, they will still most likely be favourites for the title anyway.
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 55 minutes ago
Bale done exactly the same thing and was treated like the fcucking messiah by supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m happy someone said this
Disappointing and a slap in the fans face the ones that supported him.
He’ll end up losing any love for him at this rate.
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next season the big clubs will be richer after fans are allowed back in. Utd, Real. Barca , Juve plus City will all be back on track. The market for Kane will widen. If he bangs in another 25 goals plus assists £100m is still a snip.
comment by MK (U9129)
posted 5 seconds ago
Disappointing and a slap in the fans face the ones that supported him.
He’ll end up losing any love for him at this rate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he won't. He will always be own of our own. Fans are fickle and will forget this little episode.
I don't blame Kane.
Look at the progress of other clubs and look at what we've become.
The last throw of the dice having got rid of Poch, was to bring in 'proven winner', Mourinho.
Look how that turned out.
The merry go round finding a new manager and we've ended up with the former Wolves boss!!!!
(I actually think he'll do well, but hardly a prestige manager like Conte, who was available and would have perhaps made Kane think about one more season).
We haven't gone out and got our business done early in the transfer market - standard Levy.
So what do we expect from Kane?
He deserves to win trophies and deserves to be playing CL football.
Not turning up to training is hardly the end of the World... he is trying to get his move.
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 55 minutes ago
Bale done exactly the same thing and was treated like the fcucking messiah by supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m happy someone said this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not me, never felt the same about him after that but at least he was pushing to move abroad.
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next season the big clubs will be richer after fans are allowed back in. Utd, Real. Barca , Juve plus City will all be back on track. The market for Kane will widen. If he bangs in another 25 goals plus assists £100m is still a snip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the guarantee that one of those clubs will buy him though at £100m?
comment by MK (U9129)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 55 minutes ago
Bale done exactly the same thing and was treated like the fcucking messiah by supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m happy someone said this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not me, never felt the same about him after that but at least he was pushing to move abroad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's always one or two Z z z
Simon Stone is really going all out with this. Probably the 4 or 5 the specific article from him.
This one really does smack of desperation. Kane not turning up this morning could literally mean anything.
Seems to me the media will not leave this alone u til they get their way and Kane leaves.
As a story, personally, I no longer have the remotest interest or energy to open the article up and read it.
While on the subject, does anyone know what it is with the media hatred towards Spurs ?
Has been actively happening for a couple of years now, and there must be a reason why.
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next season the big clubs will be richer after fans are allowed back in. Utd, Real. Barca , Juve plus City will all be back on track. The market for Kane will widen. If he bangs in another 25 goals plus assists £100m is still a snip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the guarantee that one of those clubs will buy him though at £100m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is none. If they don't then he stays for another season with 2 yrs remaining lol
https://twitter.com/Billie_T/status/1422143808578461696
Sign in if you want to comment
Kane doesn't show up for training
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they sold Aguero and only have Jesus going into the new season. Haaland not available and he has a very good agent unlike Kane.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 31 seconds ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. From a rival club fans point of view, whatever you get out of city doesn't weaken their financial position one iota, but the more you get the more it strengthens Spurs.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
posted on 2/8/21
Yay
posted on 2/8/21
comment by Troy'sTanguyTanganga (U6468)
posted 26 minutes ago
Was there even a bid for him.
Both clubs denied that there was one.
Why is he throwing a strop if there has not been a bid?
Grealish is citehs priority signing it seems. I Kane wants a move he should get his agent to get clubs interested in him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane will have been in dialogue with City for months, he will know they are prepared to buy him. The issue is how much City are willing to pay, they want him on the cheap. Spurs should never accept less than than their valuation, especially from those oil money doped caaants.
posted on 2/8/21
The Kane brothers coming across as a right pair of knuckleheads in this saga. He should have gotten a proper agent
posted on 2/8/21
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's also no guarantee City won't win the league this season, with or without Kane.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 14 seconds ago
The Kane brothers coming across as a right pair of knuckleheads in this saga. He should have gotten a proper agent
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. If they had a gentleman's agreement you cannot blame them for acting the way they are. Other plauers have done the same. It's normal really.
posted on 2/8/21
I think people are too focused about the price tag.
For example I reckon £100m up front rather than £130m spread over five years would be of greater use to Spurs at this time.
Looks likely he's going though and if has to forgoe loyalty payments and so on to do so that again will affect the price.
If he winds up at City on £300k a week then he's been very well advised if we're honest.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's also no guarantee City won't win the league this season, with or without Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they sign Grealish and Kane, make no mistake the league is their's for the taking.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why would anybody spend £100m+ on Kane next season when Haaland would be available for £70m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because haalands wages are gonna be hilarious and signing haaland next season doesn't help you win the league this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's also no guarantee City won't win the league this season, with or without Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If they sign Grealish and Kane, make no mistake the league is their's for the taking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is anyway, even if they don't. They piiissed it last year.
posted on 2/8/21
If they don't sign either, they will still most likely be favourites for the title anyway.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 55 minutes ago
Bale done exactly the same thing and was treated like the fcucking messiah by supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m happy someone said this
posted on 2/8/21
Disappointing and a slap in the fans face the ones that supported him.
He’ll end up losing any love for him at this rate.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next season the big clubs will be richer after fans are allowed back in. Utd, Real. Barca , Juve plus City will all be back on track. The market for Kane will widen. If he bangs in another 25 goals plus assists £100m is still a snip.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by MK (U9129)
posted 5 seconds ago
Disappointing and a slap in the fans face the ones that supported him.
He’ll end up losing any love for him at this rate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he won't. He will always be own of our own. Fans are fickle and will forget this little episode.
posted on 2/8/21
I don't blame Kane.
Look at the progress of other clubs and look at what we've become.
The last throw of the dice having got rid of Poch, was to bring in 'proven winner', Mourinho.
Look how that turned out.
The merry go round finding a new manager and we've ended up with the former Wolves boss!!!!
(I actually think he'll do well, but hardly a prestige manager like Conte, who was available and would have perhaps made Kane think about one more season).
We haven't gone out and got our business done early in the transfer market - standard Levy.
So what do we expect from Kane?
He deserves to win trophies and deserves to be playing CL football.
Not turning up to training is hardly the end of the World... he is trying to get his move.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 55 minutes ago
Bale done exactly the same thing and was treated like the fcucking messiah by supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m happy someone said this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not me, never felt the same about him after that but at least he was pushing to move abroad.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next season the big clubs will be richer after fans are allowed back in. Utd, Real. Barca , Juve plus City will all be back on track. The market for Kane will widen. If he bangs in another 25 goals plus assists £100m is still a snip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the guarantee that one of those clubs will buy him though at £100m?
posted on 2/8/21
comment by MK (U9129)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 55 minutes ago
Bale done exactly the same thing and was treated like the fcucking messiah by supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m happy someone said this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not me, never felt the same about him after that but at least he was pushing to move abroad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's always one or two Z z z
posted on 2/8/21
Simon Stone is really going all out with this. Probably the 4 or 5 the specific article from him.
This one really does smack of desperation. Kane not turning up this morning could literally mean anything.
Seems to me the media will not leave this alone u til they get their way and Kane leaves.
As a story, personally, I no longer have the remotest interest or energy to open the article up and read it.
While on the subject, does anyone know what it is with the media hatred towards Spurs ?
Has been actively happening for a couple of years now, and there must be a reason why.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 1 minute ago
As I say, the more you put your price up, the more you risk losing the deal. As much as clubs wouldn't usually complain about keeping a player of Kane's ability at the club, why bother when he doesn't want to be there.
Take £100m, or push it to £120m and then reinvest. No point pushing City for more if they aren't willing to pay it, they are pretty shrewd operators themselves despite the money they have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would rather lose the deal and keep Kane for another season. He will get over it. He is a big boy and will eventually want to bang in goals again. He can go next season for £100m.when he is 29.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no guarantee you will get £100m for him next season though. I don't know whether you think Kane leaving the club at whatever price is a shoe-in or not, but it's far from that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Next season the big clubs will be richer after fans are allowed back in. Utd, Real. Barca , Juve plus City will all be back on track. The market for Kane will widen. If he bangs in another 25 goals plus assists £100m is still a snip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the guarantee that one of those clubs will buy him though at £100m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is none. If they don't then he stays for another season with 2 yrs remaining lol
posted on 2/8/21
https://twitter.com/Billie_T/status/1422143808578461696
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9